Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability.
<h4>Introduction</h4>Choice of outcomes is critical for clinical trialists and systematic reviewers. It is currently unclear how systematic reviewers choose and pre-specify outcomes for systematic reviews. Our objective was to assess the completeness of pre-specification and comparabilit...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Ian J Saldanha, Kay Dickersin, Xue Wang, Tianjing Li |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109400 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
by: Tianjing Li, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Cochrane method for evaluating the efficacy of drugs, national contribution to international Cochrane collaboration
by: D. L. Varganova, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Systematic Cochrane Reviews in Neonatology: A Critical Appraisal
by: Christiane Willhelm, et al.
Published: (2013-08-01) -
Lorde Cochrane, o turbulento Marquês do Maranhão
by: Vasco Mariz
Published: (2012-12-01) -
Overview of Cochrane reviews on Chinese herbal medicine for stroke
by: Maoling Wei, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)