Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar.

<h4>Background</h4>The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) as a supplementary tool to conventional prevention of cholera. Dukoral, a killed whole-cell two-dose OCV, was used in a mass vaccination campaign in 2009 in Zanzibar. Public and private costs o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Schaetti, Mitchell G Weiss, Said M Ali, Claire-Lise Chaignat, Ahmed M Khatib, Rita Reyburn, Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens, Raymond Hutubessy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001844&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849469124376264704
author Christian Schaetti
Mitchell G Weiss
Said M Ali
Claire-Lise Chaignat
Ahmed M Khatib
Rita Reyburn
Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens
Raymond Hutubessy
author_facet Christian Schaetti
Mitchell G Weiss
Said M Ali
Claire-Lise Chaignat
Ahmed M Khatib
Rita Reyburn
Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens
Raymond Hutubessy
author_sort Christian Schaetti
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) as a supplementary tool to conventional prevention of cholera. Dukoral, a killed whole-cell two-dose OCV, was used in a mass vaccination campaign in 2009 in Zanzibar. Public and private costs of illness (COI) due to endemic cholera and costs of the mass vaccination campaign were estimated to assess the cost-effectiveness of OCV for this particular campaign from both the health care provider and the societal perspective.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Public and private COI were obtained from interviews with local experts, with patients from three outbreaks and from reports and record review. Cost data for the vaccination campaign were collected based on actual expenditure and planned budget data. A static cohort of 50,000 individuals was examined, including herd protection. Primary outcome measures were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per death, per case and per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. One-way sensitivity and threshold analyses were conducted. The ICER was evaluated with regard to WHO criteria for cost-effectiveness. Base-case ICERs were USD 750,000 per death averted, USD 6,000 per case averted and USD 30,000 per DALY averted, without differences between the health care provider and the societal perspective. Threshold analyses using Shanchol and assuming high incidence and case-fatality rate indicated that the purchase price per course would have to be as low as USD 1.2 to render the mass vaccination campaign cost-effective from a health care provider perspective (societal perspective: USD 1.3).<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Based on empirical and site-specific cost and effectiveness data from Zanzibar, the 2009 mass vaccination campaign was cost-ineffective mainly due to the relatively high OCV purchase price and a relatively low incidence. However, mass vaccination campaigns in Zanzibar to control endemic cholera may meet criteria for cost-effectiveness under certain circumstances, especially in high-incidence areas and at OCV prices below USD 1.3.
format Article
id doaj-art-5120a055b1db49a3bc1de60a1b2dfe60
institution Kabale University
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
spelling doaj-art-5120a055b1db49a3bc1de60a1b2dfe602025-08-20T03:25:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352012-01-01610e184410.1371/journal.pntd.0001844Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar.Christian SchaettiMitchell G WeissSaid M AliClaire-Lise ChaignatAhmed M KhatibRita ReyburnRadboud J Duintjer TebbensRaymond Hutubessy<h4>Background</h4>The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) as a supplementary tool to conventional prevention of cholera. Dukoral, a killed whole-cell two-dose OCV, was used in a mass vaccination campaign in 2009 in Zanzibar. Public and private costs of illness (COI) due to endemic cholera and costs of the mass vaccination campaign were estimated to assess the cost-effectiveness of OCV for this particular campaign from both the health care provider and the societal perspective.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Public and private COI were obtained from interviews with local experts, with patients from three outbreaks and from reports and record review. Cost data for the vaccination campaign were collected based on actual expenditure and planned budget data. A static cohort of 50,000 individuals was examined, including herd protection. Primary outcome measures were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per death, per case and per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. One-way sensitivity and threshold analyses were conducted. The ICER was evaluated with regard to WHO criteria for cost-effectiveness. Base-case ICERs were USD 750,000 per death averted, USD 6,000 per case averted and USD 30,000 per DALY averted, without differences between the health care provider and the societal perspective. Threshold analyses using Shanchol and assuming high incidence and case-fatality rate indicated that the purchase price per course would have to be as low as USD 1.2 to render the mass vaccination campaign cost-effective from a health care provider perspective (societal perspective: USD 1.3).<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Based on empirical and site-specific cost and effectiveness data from Zanzibar, the 2009 mass vaccination campaign was cost-ineffective mainly due to the relatively high OCV purchase price and a relatively low incidence. However, mass vaccination campaigns in Zanzibar to control endemic cholera may meet criteria for cost-effectiveness under certain circumstances, especially in high-incidence areas and at OCV prices below USD 1.3.https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001844&type=printable
spellingShingle Christian Schaetti
Mitchell G Weiss
Said M Ali
Claire-Lise Chaignat
Ahmed M Khatib
Rita Reyburn
Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens
Raymond Hutubessy
Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
title Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar.
title_full Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar.
title_fullStr Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar.
title_full_unstemmed Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar.
title_short Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar.
title_sort costs of illness due to cholera costs of immunization and cost effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in zanzibar
url https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001844&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT christianschaetti costsofillnessduetocholeracostsofimmunizationandcosteffectivenessofanoralcholeramassvaccinationcampaigninzanzibar
AT mitchellgweiss costsofillnessduetocholeracostsofimmunizationandcosteffectivenessofanoralcholeramassvaccinationcampaigninzanzibar
AT saidmali costsofillnessduetocholeracostsofimmunizationandcosteffectivenessofanoralcholeramassvaccinationcampaigninzanzibar
AT clairelisechaignat costsofillnessduetocholeracostsofimmunizationandcosteffectivenessofanoralcholeramassvaccinationcampaigninzanzibar
AT ahmedmkhatib costsofillnessduetocholeracostsofimmunizationandcosteffectivenessofanoralcholeramassvaccinationcampaigninzanzibar
AT ritareyburn costsofillnessduetocholeracostsofimmunizationandcosteffectivenessofanoralcholeramassvaccinationcampaigninzanzibar
AT radboudjduintjertebbens costsofillnessduetocholeracostsofimmunizationandcosteffectivenessofanoralcholeramassvaccinationcampaigninzanzibar
AT raymondhutubessy costsofillnessduetocholeracostsofimmunizationandcosteffectivenessofanoralcholeramassvaccinationcampaigninzanzibar