Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parameters
# Background There is currently no unified classification scheme for accurately describing vesico-vaginal fistulas, thereby limiting communication between surgeons and the ability to compare research. Many factors related to surgical failure or success have not been explored, and surgeons currently...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Inishmore Laser Scientific Publishing Ltd
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Global Health Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.77981 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850103893525004288 |
|---|---|
| author | Elad T Fraiman Rachel Pope |
| author_facet | Elad T Fraiman Rachel Pope |
| author_sort | Elad T Fraiman |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | # Background
There is currently no unified classification scheme for accurately describing vesico-vaginal fistulas, thereby limiting communication between surgeons and the ability to compare research. Many factors related to surgical failure or success have not been explored, and surgeons currently do not universally use the same classifications. The objective of this study is to determine which factors are the most important to include in a future obstetric fistula classification scheme.
# Methods
Members of the International Society of Obstetric Fistula Surgeons were surveyed using a non-validated questionnaire to explore their experience and factors they think were most important to include in an updated comprehensive obstetric fistula classification scheme. Based on the surgeons' response, an average ranking of each determinant of obstetric fistula classification system was computed.
# Results
The most critical factors that surgeons found necessary to include in an updated fistula classification system are the bladder size (88.9%, n=16, rank=8.53), degree of fibrosis of the vagina (83.3%, n=15, rank=8.12), degree of urethral damage (88.9%, n=16, rank=9.34), location of the fistula (100%, n=18, rank=9.22), urethral length (94.4%, n=17, rank=9.06), and whether the fistula is circumferential or not (94.4%, n=17, rank=9.18). The least important factors were how long the patient had had a fistula (11.1%, n=2, rank=2.28) and intraoperative complications (22.2%, n=4, rank=4.59). For most factors important in repair, there was a non-significant correlation between experience level and ratings from 0-10. Scores for urethral length showed a significant correlation between increased surgical experience and higher ratings of importance.
# Conclusions
Three most commonly used classification schemes by Goh, Waaldjik, and the World Health Organization (WHO) only capture some important factors determined by the surveyed surgeons. Given the inconsistency between what experienced and expert surgeons deem to be important determinants for the classification of obstetric fistula and what is currently included in classification systems, we call for constructing a new, validated classification system. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5101296ee7234f039780e90ea2a7a13d |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2399-1623 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Inishmore Laser Scientific Publishing Ltd |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Global Health Reports |
| spelling | doaj-art-5101296ee7234f039780e90ea2a7a13d2025-08-20T02:39:26ZengInishmore Laser Scientific Publishing LtdJournal of Global Health Reports2399-16232023-12-01710.29392/001c.77981Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parametersElad T FraimanRachel Pope# Background There is currently no unified classification scheme for accurately describing vesico-vaginal fistulas, thereby limiting communication between surgeons and the ability to compare research. Many factors related to surgical failure or success have not been explored, and surgeons currently do not universally use the same classifications. The objective of this study is to determine which factors are the most important to include in a future obstetric fistula classification scheme. # Methods Members of the International Society of Obstetric Fistula Surgeons were surveyed using a non-validated questionnaire to explore their experience and factors they think were most important to include in an updated comprehensive obstetric fistula classification scheme. Based on the surgeons' response, an average ranking of each determinant of obstetric fistula classification system was computed. # Results The most critical factors that surgeons found necessary to include in an updated fistula classification system are the bladder size (88.9%, n=16, rank=8.53), degree of fibrosis of the vagina (83.3%, n=15, rank=8.12), degree of urethral damage (88.9%, n=16, rank=9.34), location of the fistula (100%, n=18, rank=9.22), urethral length (94.4%, n=17, rank=9.06), and whether the fistula is circumferential or not (94.4%, n=17, rank=9.18). The least important factors were how long the patient had had a fistula (11.1%, n=2, rank=2.28) and intraoperative complications (22.2%, n=4, rank=4.59). For most factors important in repair, there was a non-significant correlation between experience level and ratings from 0-10. Scores for urethral length showed a significant correlation between increased surgical experience and higher ratings of importance. # Conclusions Three most commonly used classification schemes by Goh, Waaldjik, and the World Health Organization (WHO) only capture some important factors determined by the surveyed surgeons. Given the inconsistency between what experienced and expert surgeons deem to be important determinants for the classification of obstetric fistula and what is currently included in classification systems, we call for constructing a new, validated classification system.https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.77981 |
| spellingShingle | Elad T Fraiman Rachel Pope Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parameters Journal of Global Health Reports |
| title | Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parameters |
| title_full | Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parameters |
| title_fullStr | Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parameters |
| title_full_unstemmed | Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parameters |
| title_short | Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parameters |
| title_sort | surgeons perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system exploring the key parameters |
| url | https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.77981 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eladtfraiman surgeonsperspectivesforafutureobstetricfistulaclassificationsystemexploringthekeyparameters AT rachelpope surgeonsperspectivesforafutureobstetricfistulaclassificationsystemexploringthekeyparameters |