Platform governance and civil society organisations: Tensions between reform and revolution continuum

Focusing on the European context and the Digital Services Act, this article probes the role of civil society organisations (CSOs) in platform governance. Theoretically, we locate CSOs within the paradigm of neoliberal governance, which aims to limit state power advancing a market-based rationality....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eugenia Siapera, Elizabeth Farries
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society 2025-03-01
Series:Internet Policy Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://policyreview.info/node/2002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849704229282775040
author Eugenia Siapera
Elizabeth Farries
author_facet Eugenia Siapera
Elizabeth Farries
author_sort Eugenia Siapera
collection DOAJ
description Focusing on the European context and the Digital Services Act, this article probes the role of civil society organisations (CSOs) in platform governance. Theoretically, we locate CSOs within the paradigm of neoliberal governance, which aims to limit state power advancing a market-based rationality. Civil society is tasked with pushing against both state and markets, although in doing so it may end up upholding the terms of neoliberal governance. In this context, we ask, to what extent can digital rights CSOs fulfil their normative role and how do they participate in platform governance? Empirically, we rely on a set of in depth interviews with key informants from five leading EU digital rights CSOs, supported by autoethnography and document analysis. Our findings suggest that CSOs operate across what we refer as the ‘reform versus revolution’ continuum. While those closer to the ‘reform’ end aim to make incremental changes to improve platforms, those closer to the ‘revolution’ end take a more radical view aiming to dissolve platforms altogether. While this structuring division reflects positions that are critical in different ways, pragmatic issues around (i) values, principles and organisational aspects; (ii) financial dynamics including funding and sustainability; and (iii) CSO stakeholder relations with platforms, policy makers, and other CSOs, undermine CSOs’ ability to act effectively, let alone engage in a radical repositioning of platform governance terms and impacts.
format Article
id doaj-art-50dd269796be4eda92b91e07b99cc003
institution DOAJ
issn 2197-6775
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
record_format Article
series Internet Policy Review
spelling doaj-art-50dd269796be4eda92b91e07b99cc0032025-08-20T03:16:50ZengAlexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and SocietyInternet Policy Review2197-67752025-03-0114110.14763/2025.1.2002Platform governance and civil society organisations: Tensions between reform and revolution continuumEugenia Siapera0Elizabeth Farries1University College DublinUniversity College DublinFocusing on the European context and the Digital Services Act, this article probes the role of civil society organisations (CSOs) in platform governance. Theoretically, we locate CSOs within the paradigm of neoliberal governance, which aims to limit state power advancing a market-based rationality. Civil society is tasked with pushing against both state and markets, although in doing so it may end up upholding the terms of neoliberal governance. In this context, we ask, to what extent can digital rights CSOs fulfil their normative role and how do they participate in platform governance? Empirically, we rely on a set of in depth interviews with key informants from five leading EU digital rights CSOs, supported by autoethnography and document analysis. Our findings suggest that CSOs operate across what we refer as the ‘reform versus revolution’ continuum. While those closer to the ‘reform’ end aim to make incremental changes to improve platforms, those closer to the ‘revolution’ end take a more radical view aiming to dissolve platforms altogether. While this structuring division reflects positions that are critical in different ways, pragmatic issues around (i) values, principles and organisational aspects; (ii) financial dynamics including funding and sustainability; and (iii) CSO stakeholder relations with platforms, policy makers, and other CSOs, undermine CSOs’ ability to act effectively, let alone engage in a radical repositioning of platform governance terms and impacts.https://policyreview.info/node/2002Platform governanceCivil society organisationsDigital Services ActDigital rights
spellingShingle Eugenia Siapera
Elizabeth Farries
Platform governance and civil society organisations: Tensions between reform and revolution continuum
Internet Policy Review
Platform governance
Civil society organisations
Digital Services Act
Digital rights
title Platform governance and civil society organisations: Tensions between reform and revolution continuum
title_full Platform governance and civil society organisations: Tensions between reform and revolution continuum
title_fullStr Platform governance and civil society organisations: Tensions between reform and revolution continuum
title_full_unstemmed Platform governance and civil society organisations: Tensions between reform and revolution continuum
title_short Platform governance and civil society organisations: Tensions between reform and revolution continuum
title_sort platform governance and civil society organisations tensions between reform and revolution continuum
topic Platform governance
Civil society organisations
Digital Services Act
Digital rights
url https://policyreview.info/node/2002
work_keys_str_mv AT eugeniasiapera platformgovernanceandcivilsocietyorganisationstensionsbetweenreformandrevolutioncontinuum
AT elizabethfarries platformgovernanceandcivilsocietyorganisationstensionsbetweenreformandrevolutioncontinuum