Functional Recovery Following Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures Fixated with the Dynamic Hip Screw vs. the Percutaneous Compression Plate

The Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is currently the most frequently used implant for the treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures. The Percutaneous Compression Plate (PCCP) is a recently developed, alternative device that involves minimal invasive surgery. The objective of the present study was to compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yocheved Laufer, Miriam Lahav, Reuben Lenger, Elliot Sprecher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2005-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.29
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849406779917598720
author Yocheved Laufer
Miriam Lahav
Reuben Lenger
Elliot Sprecher
author_facet Yocheved Laufer
Miriam Lahav
Reuben Lenger
Elliot Sprecher
author_sort Yocheved Laufer
collection DOAJ
description The Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is currently the most frequently used implant for the treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures. The Percutaneous Compression Plate (PCCP) is a recently developed, alternative device that involves minimal invasive surgery. The objective of the present study was to compare functional recovery following these two surgical procedures. A total of 76 consecutive elderly subjects (mean age and standard deviation, 80.6 ± 5.5) following pertrochanteric hip fracture fixation were evaluated prospectively. Functional recovery was assessed 3 and 12 weeks and 2 years following surgery. Differences between groups 3 weeks postsurgery were found only in pain level during ambulation and in the weight-bearing capability of the operated extremity, which were both in favor of the PCCP. By 3 months, both groups had improved in all measures, but did not reach their preinjury level of independence. However, the PCCP group ambulated with fewer assistive devices and demonstrated better recovery of basic activities of daily living (BADL). While the majority of the subjects from both groups ambulated independently 2 years postsurgery, the PCCP group exhibited less pain during ambulation, was more independent in ADL, and required fewer assistive devices for ambulation. To summarize, the PCCP presents enhanced short- and long-term recovery of functional abilities in comparison to DHS. However, given the limited number of patients, further studies are necessary to substantiate these results.
format Article
id doaj-art-50c798e1bb034dccbba14701bd7124ac
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2005-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-50c798e1bb034dccbba14701bd7124ac2025-08-20T03:36:15ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2005-01-01522122910.1100/tsw.2005.29Functional Recovery Following Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures Fixated with the Dynamic Hip Screw vs. the Percutaneous Compression PlateYocheved Laufer0Miriam Lahav1Reuben Lenger2Elliot Sprecher3Department of Physical Therapy, University of Haifa, IL-31905 Haifa, IsraelPhysical Therapy Department, Clalit Health Services, Tivon, IsraelFlieman Geriatric Rehabilitation Center, Haifa, IsraelDepartment of Neurology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, IsraelThe Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is currently the most frequently used implant for the treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures. The Percutaneous Compression Plate (PCCP) is a recently developed, alternative device that involves minimal invasive surgery. The objective of the present study was to compare functional recovery following these two surgical procedures. A total of 76 consecutive elderly subjects (mean age and standard deviation, 80.6 ± 5.5) following pertrochanteric hip fracture fixation were evaluated prospectively. Functional recovery was assessed 3 and 12 weeks and 2 years following surgery. Differences between groups 3 weeks postsurgery were found only in pain level during ambulation and in the weight-bearing capability of the operated extremity, which were both in favor of the PCCP. By 3 months, both groups had improved in all measures, but did not reach their preinjury level of independence. However, the PCCP group ambulated with fewer assistive devices and demonstrated better recovery of basic activities of daily living (BADL). While the majority of the subjects from both groups ambulated independently 2 years postsurgery, the PCCP group exhibited less pain during ambulation, was more independent in ADL, and required fewer assistive devices for ambulation. To summarize, the PCCP presents enhanced short- and long-term recovery of functional abilities in comparison to DHS. However, given the limited number of patients, further studies are necessary to substantiate these results.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.29
spellingShingle Yocheved Laufer
Miriam Lahav
Reuben Lenger
Elliot Sprecher
Functional Recovery Following Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures Fixated with the Dynamic Hip Screw vs. the Percutaneous Compression Plate
The Scientific World Journal
title Functional Recovery Following Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures Fixated with the Dynamic Hip Screw vs. the Percutaneous Compression Plate
title_full Functional Recovery Following Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures Fixated with the Dynamic Hip Screw vs. the Percutaneous Compression Plate
title_fullStr Functional Recovery Following Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures Fixated with the Dynamic Hip Screw vs. the Percutaneous Compression Plate
title_full_unstemmed Functional Recovery Following Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures Fixated with the Dynamic Hip Screw vs. the Percutaneous Compression Plate
title_short Functional Recovery Following Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures Fixated with the Dynamic Hip Screw vs. the Percutaneous Compression Plate
title_sort functional recovery following pertrochanteric hip fractures fixated with the dynamic hip screw vs the percutaneous compression plate
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.29
work_keys_str_mv AT yochevedlaufer functionalrecoveryfollowingpertrochanterichipfracturesfixatedwiththedynamichipscrewvsthepercutaneouscompressionplate
AT miriamlahav functionalrecoveryfollowingpertrochanterichipfracturesfixatedwiththedynamichipscrewvsthepercutaneouscompressionplate
AT reubenlenger functionalrecoveryfollowingpertrochanterichipfracturesfixatedwiththedynamichipscrewvsthepercutaneouscompressionplate
AT elliotsprecher functionalrecoveryfollowingpertrochanterichipfracturesfixatedwiththedynamichipscrewvsthepercutaneouscompressionplate