Does experience matter? Understanding the mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship: Learning-by-doing or economies of scale.

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the underlying mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship, namely learning-by-doing and scale economies in patients with sepsis.<h4>Design and study setting</h4>Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with sepsis between 1 January 2010 and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ritesh Maharaj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318808
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849427967405457408
author Ritesh Maharaj
author_facet Ritesh Maharaj
author_sort Ritesh Maharaj
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the underlying mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship, namely learning-by-doing and scale economies in patients with sepsis.<h4>Design and study setting</h4>Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with sepsis between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016 in 231 intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK.<h4>Participants</h4>The patient was the primary unit of analysis. Patient and ICU characteristics were included for risk adjustment. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme database.<h4>Study design</h4>We used the lags of quarterly sepsis volume in the ICU as a measure of the learning-by-doing effect.<h4>Outcome measure</h4>The outcome of hospital mortality after ICU admission for sepsis was assessed using a multilevel probit regression model of patients nested in ICUs over quarters.<h4>Data collection/extraction methods</h4>Critically ill patients with sepsis were identified by the Sepsis-3 consensus criteria.<h4>Results</h4>Our study identified a cohort of 273001 patients with sepsis admitted to 231 ICUs in the UK. Our study finds that in comparison with contemporaneous volume, lagged volume had a stronger association with acute hospital mortality. This implies that the dynamic learning-by-doing effect is more important than the static economies of scale effect. This finding was consistent across alternate specifications of learning-by-doing.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The study provides evidence that the underlying mechanism for the volume-outcome relationship is learning-by-doing and not the static economies of scale. ICUs caring for patients with sepsis tend to improve by experience.
format Article
id doaj-art-50bdabc57ff845b6985f6f87e21ca667
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-50bdabc57ff845b6985f6f87e21ca6672025-08-20T03:28:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01203e031880810.1371/journal.pone.0318808Does experience matter? Understanding the mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship: Learning-by-doing or economies of scale.Ritesh Maharaj<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the underlying mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship, namely learning-by-doing and scale economies in patients with sepsis.<h4>Design and study setting</h4>Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with sepsis between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016 in 231 intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK.<h4>Participants</h4>The patient was the primary unit of analysis. Patient and ICU characteristics were included for risk adjustment. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme database.<h4>Study design</h4>We used the lags of quarterly sepsis volume in the ICU as a measure of the learning-by-doing effect.<h4>Outcome measure</h4>The outcome of hospital mortality after ICU admission for sepsis was assessed using a multilevel probit regression model of patients nested in ICUs over quarters.<h4>Data collection/extraction methods</h4>Critically ill patients with sepsis were identified by the Sepsis-3 consensus criteria.<h4>Results</h4>Our study identified a cohort of 273001 patients with sepsis admitted to 231 ICUs in the UK. Our study finds that in comparison with contemporaneous volume, lagged volume had a stronger association with acute hospital mortality. This implies that the dynamic learning-by-doing effect is more important than the static economies of scale effect. This finding was consistent across alternate specifications of learning-by-doing.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The study provides evidence that the underlying mechanism for the volume-outcome relationship is learning-by-doing and not the static economies of scale. ICUs caring for patients with sepsis tend to improve by experience.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318808
spellingShingle Ritesh Maharaj
Does experience matter? Understanding the mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship: Learning-by-doing or economies of scale.
PLoS ONE
title Does experience matter? Understanding the mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship: Learning-by-doing or economies of scale.
title_full Does experience matter? Understanding the mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship: Learning-by-doing or economies of scale.
title_fullStr Does experience matter? Understanding the mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship: Learning-by-doing or economies of scale.
title_full_unstemmed Does experience matter? Understanding the mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship: Learning-by-doing or economies of scale.
title_short Does experience matter? Understanding the mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship: Learning-by-doing or economies of scale.
title_sort does experience matter understanding the mechanism of the volume outcome relationship learning by doing or economies of scale
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318808
work_keys_str_mv AT riteshmaharaj doesexperiencematterunderstandingthemechanismofthevolumeoutcomerelationshiplearningbydoingoreconomiesofscale