Short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stability

Background: The trend of the modern humeral components in total shoulder arthroplasty is toward shorter and shorter humeral stems. However, the question remains whether short uncemented stems can provide the same implant stability as long stems. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the torsional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulia Galteri, MSc, Sara Montanari, PhD, Giacomo Dozza, BSc, Marco Palanca, PhD, Luca Cristofolini, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:JSES International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004183
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841545501051191296
author Giulia Galteri, MSc
Sara Montanari, PhD
Giacomo Dozza, BSc
Marco Palanca, PhD
Luca Cristofolini, PhD
author_facet Giulia Galteri, MSc
Sara Montanari, PhD
Giacomo Dozza, BSc
Marco Palanca, PhD
Luca Cristofolini, PhD
author_sort Giulia Galteri, MSc
collection DOAJ
description Background: The trend of the modern humeral components in total shoulder arthroplasty is toward shorter and shorter humeral stems. However, the question remains whether short uncemented stems can provide the same implant stability as long stems. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the torsional primary stability and the pull-out extraction force of both a long and a short version of the same stem. Materials and methods: Ten humeral components (five long stems and five short stems) were press-fitted into ten synthetic composite humeri. A torsional load was applied to generate the most critical loading condition. The specimens were loaded with 100 cycles between 2 Nm and 10 Nm, at 1 Hz. A 3D Digital Image Correlation system was used to measure the relative displacement between the prosthesis and the host bone during the test. After completing the torsional test, the pull-out force was measured. Differences between the long and short stem on the biomechanical parameters (permanent migrations, inducible micromotion, and extraction force) were tested with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (P < .05). Results: The main rotational inducible micromotion was around the craniocaudal axis. No significant differences were found between the rotational permanent migrations of the long and short stem around the craniocaudal (P = .421), anteroposterior (P = .841), and mediolateral axes (P = .452). No significant differences were found between the rotational inducible micromotions of the long and short stem around the craniocaudal (P = .222), anteroposterior (P = .420), and mediolateral axes (P = .655). No significant differences were found between the permanent translations of the long and short stem along the craniocaudal (P = .341), anteroposterior (P = .420), and mediolateral (P = .429) directions. No significant differences were found between the translations of the long and short stem in terms of inducible translation in the craniocaudal (P = .547), anteroposterior (P = .999), and mediolateral axes (P = .285). Similar extraction force (P = .35) was found. Discussion and Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was found between the long-stem and short-stem implants. These results show that short uncemented stems can provide adequate primary mechanical stability. As the long-stem version of this stem is already clinically used, the present findings suggest that the short version can be reasonably expected to deliver similar outcomes in terms of implant stability.
format Article
id doaj-art-509ab1a18ea446bbb4ba72589211a5e5
institution Kabale University
issn 2666-6383
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSES International
spelling doaj-art-509ab1a18ea446bbb4ba72589211a5e52025-01-12T05:26:05ZengElsevierJSES International2666-63832025-01-0191212218Short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stabilityGiulia Galteri, MSc0Sara Montanari, PhD1Giacomo Dozza, BSc2Marco Palanca, PhD3Luca Cristofolini, PhD4Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyCorresponding author: Luca Cristofolini, PhD, Department of Industrial Engineering School of Engineering and Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Terracini, 28, Bologna 40131, Italy.; Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyBackground: The trend of the modern humeral components in total shoulder arthroplasty is toward shorter and shorter humeral stems. However, the question remains whether short uncemented stems can provide the same implant stability as long stems. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the torsional primary stability and the pull-out extraction force of both a long and a short version of the same stem. Materials and methods: Ten humeral components (five long stems and five short stems) were press-fitted into ten synthetic composite humeri. A torsional load was applied to generate the most critical loading condition. The specimens were loaded with 100 cycles between 2 Nm and 10 Nm, at 1 Hz. A 3D Digital Image Correlation system was used to measure the relative displacement between the prosthesis and the host bone during the test. After completing the torsional test, the pull-out force was measured. Differences between the long and short stem on the biomechanical parameters (permanent migrations, inducible micromotion, and extraction force) were tested with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (P < .05). Results: The main rotational inducible micromotion was around the craniocaudal axis. No significant differences were found between the rotational permanent migrations of the long and short stem around the craniocaudal (P = .421), anteroposterior (P = .841), and mediolateral axes (P = .452). No significant differences were found between the rotational inducible micromotions of the long and short stem around the craniocaudal (P = .222), anteroposterior (P = .420), and mediolateral axes (P = .655). No significant differences were found between the permanent translations of the long and short stem along the craniocaudal (P = .341), anteroposterior (P = .420), and mediolateral (P = .429) directions. No significant differences were found between the translations of the long and short stem in terms of inducible translation in the craniocaudal (P = .547), anteroposterior (P = .999), and mediolateral axes (P = .285). Similar extraction force (P = .35) was found. Discussion and Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was found between the long-stem and short-stem implants. These results show that short uncemented stems can provide adequate primary mechanical stability. As the long-stem version of this stem is already clinically used, the present findings suggest that the short version can be reasonably expected to deliver similar outcomes in terms of implant stability.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004183Shoulder prosthesisUncemented humeral componentTotal shoulder arthroplasty (TSA)Biomechanical testShort-stemPrimary torsional stability
spellingShingle Giulia Galteri, MSc
Sara Montanari, PhD
Giacomo Dozza, BSc
Marco Palanca, PhD
Luca Cristofolini, PhD
Short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stability
JSES International
Shoulder prosthesis
Uncemented humeral component
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA)
Biomechanical test
Short-stem
Primary torsional stability
title Short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stability
title_full Short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stability
title_fullStr Short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stability
title_full_unstemmed Short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stability
title_short Short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stability
title_sort short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stability
topic Shoulder prosthesis
Uncemented humeral component
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA)
Biomechanical test
Short-stem
Primary torsional stability
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004183
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliagalterimsc shorthumeralstemintotalshoulderarthroplastydoesnotjeopardizeprimaryimplantstability
AT saramontanariphd shorthumeralstemintotalshoulderarthroplastydoesnotjeopardizeprimaryimplantstability
AT giacomodozzabsc shorthumeralstemintotalshoulderarthroplastydoesnotjeopardizeprimaryimplantstability
AT marcopalancaphd shorthumeralstemintotalshoulderarthroplastydoesnotjeopardizeprimaryimplantstability
AT lucacristofoliniphd shorthumeralstemintotalshoulderarthroplastydoesnotjeopardizeprimaryimplantstability