Providing a Coherence Strategy for Six Sigma and Capability Maturity Model of Software
Purpose: Challenges associated with changes in the last ten years confirmed the importance of businesses' use of the software. Today, organizations are viewed differently by the cost and quality of software. While the organizations formally reduce redundant development and engineering costs, th...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education, Tonekabon,
2020-08-01
|
| Series: | مدیریت نوآوری و راهبردهای عملیاتی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.journal-imos.ir/article_120201_20d87b222af10fb8960531838c9ace54.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832577809722114048 |
|---|---|
| author | Shaban Elahi Jalil Mousavi |
| author_facet | Shaban Elahi Jalil Mousavi |
| author_sort | Shaban Elahi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose: Challenges associated with changes in the last ten years confirmed the importance of businesses' use of the software. Today, organizations are viewed differently by the cost and quality of software. While the organizations formally reduce redundant development and engineering costs, the fundamental nature of the software in a product or service on the evaluation is a development process. Thus, organizations are looking for effective software development. Methodology: In this study, Six Sigma methodology focuses on improving the process and reducing variability. Six Sigma projects use one of two DMAIC and DFSS methodologies. Findings: Two dominant approaches are available if they are participating. One of the solutions is the CMMI model, which is a framework for improving the methods and service delivery. Another option is to use the Six Sigma program to articulate the issues of quality and customer satisfaction. It is necessary to understand whether these attitudes are compatible with integrated systems or should be used independently. Originality/Value: This paper addresses the issues of coherence and consistency of these two methodologies and checks their coherence strategies. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-506d118594c34b929861a53c888dbe27 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2783-1345 2717-4581 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
| publisher | Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education, Tonekabon, |
| record_format | Article |
| series | مدیریت نوآوری و راهبردهای عملیاتی |
| spelling | doaj-art-506d118594c34b929861a53c888dbe272025-01-30T14:59:08ZfasAyandegan Institute of Higher Education, Tonekabon,مدیریت نوآوری و راهبردهای عملیاتی2783-13452717-45812020-08-01129811310.22105/imos.2020.260562.1005120201Providing a Coherence Strategy for Six Sigma and Capability Maturity Model of SoftwareShaban Elahi0Jalil Mousavi1Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, IranMaster of Information Technology Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.Purpose: Challenges associated with changes in the last ten years confirmed the importance of businesses' use of the software. Today, organizations are viewed differently by the cost and quality of software. While the organizations formally reduce redundant development and engineering costs, the fundamental nature of the software in a product or service on the evaluation is a development process. Thus, organizations are looking for effective software development. Methodology: In this study, Six Sigma methodology focuses on improving the process and reducing variability. Six Sigma projects use one of two DMAIC and DFSS methodologies. Findings: Two dominant approaches are available if they are participating. One of the solutions is the CMMI model, which is a framework for improving the methods and service delivery. Another option is to use the Six Sigma program to articulate the issues of quality and customer satisfaction. It is necessary to understand whether these attitudes are compatible with integrated systems or should be used independently. Originality/Value: This paper addresses the issues of coherence and consistency of these two methodologies and checks their coherence strategies.http://www.journal-imos.ir/article_120201_20d87b222af10fb8960531838c9ace54.pdfcmmcmmisix sigmadmaicsystem engineeringsoftware engineering |
| spellingShingle | Shaban Elahi Jalil Mousavi Providing a Coherence Strategy for Six Sigma and Capability Maturity Model of Software مدیریت نوآوری و راهبردهای عملیاتی cmm cmmi six sigma dmaic system engineering software engineering |
| title | Providing a Coherence Strategy for Six Sigma and Capability Maturity Model of Software |
| title_full | Providing a Coherence Strategy for Six Sigma and Capability Maturity Model of Software |
| title_fullStr | Providing a Coherence Strategy for Six Sigma and Capability Maturity Model of Software |
| title_full_unstemmed | Providing a Coherence Strategy for Six Sigma and Capability Maturity Model of Software |
| title_short | Providing a Coherence Strategy for Six Sigma and Capability Maturity Model of Software |
| title_sort | providing a coherence strategy for six sigma and capability maturity model of software |
| topic | cmm cmmi six sigma dmaic system engineering software engineering |
| url | http://www.journal-imos.ir/article_120201_20d87b222af10fb8960531838c9ace54.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shabanelahi providingacoherencestrategyforsixsigmaandcapabilitymaturitymodelofsoftware AT jalilmousavi providingacoherencestrategyforsixsigmaandcapabilitymaturitymodelofsoftware |