Anaesthetic efficacy of intraligamentary injection compared to incisive nerve block using 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride: a randomized clinical trial
Abstract Background In dentistry, local anesthetic is frequently used to manage pain throughout several phases of dental treatments, including tooth extraction. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for controlling pain during mandibular exodontia (tooth extraction), specifi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | BMC Oral Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05147-z |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832594404357963776 |
|---|---|
| author | Suzan Salem Islam Saad Ramy Elmoazen Ghada Amin Khalifa |
| author_facet | Suzan Salem Islam Saad Ramy Elmoazen Ghada Amin Khalifa |
| author_sort | Suzan Salem |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background In dentistry, local anesthetic is frequently used to manage pain throughout several phases of dental treatments, including tooth extraction. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for controlling pain during mandibular exodontia (tooth extraction), specifically focusing on the pain experienced during injection and extraction of mandibular anterior and premolars teeth. The two techniques being compared are the intraligamentary injection technique (ILI) and the incisive nerve block technique (INB). Materials and methods In this study, 100 mandibular anterior and premolars and teeth that were indicated for extraction were included. The effectiveness of the two local anaesthesia techniques, intraligamentary injection technique (ILI) and incisive nerve block (INB), were compared using Modified Dental Anxiety Scale for Dental Extraction Procedure (MDAS-DEP) and visual analogue scale (VAS) during the injection and extraction stages of the procedure. Results A total of 100 participants (42 females, 58 males) with a mean age of 50.97 ± 11.59 years took part in the study. The mean VAS score in the INB group was 6.14 after injection and 3.86 after extraction, while in the ILI group, it was 5.46 and 2.90, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups both after injection (p = 0.001) and extraction (p < 0.001), as well as within each group (Control: p < 0.001; Study: p < 0.001). For MDAS-DEP, the INB group had mean scores of 15.86 and 11.26 after injection and extraction, respectively, while the ILI group had scores of 15.68 and 10.94, showing a significant difference within each group after both injection (p < 0.001) and extraction (p = 0.001). However, no significant difference was found when comparing MDAS-DEP scores between the two groups from injection to extraction (p = 0.802). Conclusion The intraligamentary injection technique (ILI) appears less painful during injection and provides profound pain relief during extraction. The results suggest that ILI can be used as a sole anaesthetic technique during extraction of lower anterior and premolar teeth. Trial registration This trial was retrospectively registered on 27/01/2023 with the identifier ISRCTN83272316 in Isrctn.com. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5042ebd5026d40f58272a2888cd810ac |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1472-6831 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Oral Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-5042ebd5026d40f58272a2888cd810ac2025-01-19T12:41:06ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312025-01-0125111010.1186/s12903-024-05147-zAnaesthetic efficacy of intraligamentary injection compared to incisive nerve block using 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride: a randomized clinical trialSuzan Salem0Islam Saad1Ramy Elmoazen2Ghada Amin Khalifa3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Alexandria University Hospitals, Alexandria UniversityDepartment of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral diagnosis and Radiology, Alexandria University Hospitals, Alexandria UniversitySchool of Computing, University of Eastern FinlandMaxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Science, College of Dentistry, Qassim UniversityAbstract Background In dentistry, local anesthetic is frequently used to manage pain throughout several phases of dental treatments, including tooth extraction. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for controlling pain during mandibular exodontia (tooth extraction), specifically focusing on the pain experienced during injection and extraction of mandibular anterior and premolars teeth. The two techniques being compared are the intraligamentary injection technique (ILI) and the incisive nerve block technique (INB). Materials and methods In this study, 100 mandibular anterior and premolars and teeth that were indicated for extraction were included. The effectiveness of the two local anaesthesia techniques, intraligamentary injection technique (ILI) and incisive nerve block (INB), were compared using Modified Dental Anxiety Scale for Dental Extraction Procedure (MDAS-DEP) and visual analogue scale (VAS) during the injection and extraction stages of the procedure. Results A total of 100 participants (42 females, 58 males) with a mean age of 50.97 ± 11.59 years took part in the study. The mean VAS score in the INB group was 6.14 after injection and 3.86 after extraction, while in the ILI group, it was 5.46 and 2.90, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups both after injection (p = 0.001) and extraction (p < 0.001), as well as within each group (Control: p < 0.001; Study: p < 0.001). For MDAS-DEP, the INB group had mean scores of 15.86 and 11.26 after injection and extraction, respectively, while the ILI group had scores of 15.68 and 10.94, showing a significant difference within each group after both injection (p < 0.001) and extraction (p = 0.001). However, no significant difference was found when comparing MDAS-DEP scores between the two groups from injection to extraction (p = 0.802). Conclusion The intraligamentary injection technique (ILI) appears less painful during injection and provides profound pain relief during extraction. The results suggest that ILI can be used as a sole anaesthetic technique during extraction of lower anterior and premolar teeth. Trial registration This trial was retrospectively registered on 27/01/2023 with the identifier ISRCTN83272316 in Isrctn.com.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05147-zAnxietyIncisive nerve blockIntraligamentary injection technique |
| spellingShingle | Suzan Salem Islam Saad Ramy Elmoazen Ghada Amin Khalifa Anaesthetic efficacy of intraligamentary injection compared to incisive nerve block using 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride: a randomized clinical trial BMC Oral Health Anxiety Incisive nerve block Intraligamentary injection technique |
| title | Anaesthetic efficacy of intraligamentary injection compared to incisive nerve block using 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_full | Anaesthetic efficacy of intraligamentary injection compared to incisive nerve block using 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_fullStr | Anaesthetic efficacy of intraligamentary injection compared to incisive nerve block using 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Anaesthetic efficacy of intraligamentary injection compared to incisive nerve block using 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_short | Anaesthetic efficacy of intraligamentary injection compared to incisive nerve block using 3% mepivacaine hydrochloride: a randomized clinical trial |
| title_sort | anaesthetic efficacy of intraligamentary injection compared to incisive nerve block using 3 mepivacaine hydrochloride a randomized clinical trial |
| topic | Anxiety Incisive nerve block Intraligamentary injection technique |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05147-z |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT suzansalem anaestheticefficacyofintraligamentaryinjectioncomparedtoincisivenerveblockusing3mepivacainehydrochloridearandomizedclinicaltrial AT islamsaad anaestheticefficacyofintraligamentaryinjectioncomparedtoincisivenerveblockusing3mepivacainehydrochloridearandomizedclinicaltrial AT ramyelmoazen anaestheticefficacyofintraligamentaryinjectioncomparedtoincisivenerveblockusing3mepivacainehydrochloridearandomizedclinicaltrial AT ghadaaminkhalifa anaestheticefficacyofintraligamentaryinjectioncomparedtoincisivenerveblockusing3mepivacainehydrochloridearandomizedclinicaltrial |