Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping review

Introduction Since the turn of the millennium, recovery has become mainstream in mental health services across much of the Western world. Resulting from this, many jurisdictions, including Ireland, have created frameworks and policies to support its integration into traditionally, statutory mental h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael John Norton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/5/e058428.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850190659677323264
author Michael John Norton
author_facet Michael John Norton
author_sort Michael John Norton
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Since the turn of the millennium, recovery has become mainstream in mental health services across much of the Western world. Resulting from this, many jurisdictions, including Ireland, have created frameworks and policies to support its integration into traditionally, statutory mental health services. Coproduction is a cornerstone of recovery. However, there is confusion about what the term means, along with queries surrounding its implementation. Consequently, studies have identified that coproduction compliments recovery in several ways. This has been found to have a positive impact on a service user’s ongoing recovery journey. However, no synthesis has yet been undertaken into coproduction within mental health service provision. As such, this protocol aimed to provide information on a scoping review to examine the evidence base for coproduction within mental health service provision.Methods and analysis A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis compliant scoping review is proposed, based on Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. This framework documents a five-stage approach to conducting scoping reviews. Search terms are stated and a variety of databases (CINAHL, Jstor, Ovid SP, PsycINFO, PsycTEST, PubMed, RCNi, Science Direct, Web of Science and Wiley Online Library) and repositories (Cochrane Online Library, ETHos, nz.research.org.nz, ProQuest, National ETD Portal, Google, Google Scholar and ResearchGate) will be examined for papers based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. The search range is from 1 January 1970 to 31 December 2021.Ethics and dissemination This paper is a protocol which requires no ethical approval. Information relating to the review is stored with OSF Registries, where it is freely available. The protocol details were updated in February and again in May 2022. The resulting scoping review will be distributed through peer-reviewed publications.
format Article
id doaj-art-503b7f03b77b41fa88e71d8fe3ac86ee
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-503b7f03b77b41fa88e71d8fe3ac86ee2025-08-20T02:15:12ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-05-0112510.1136/bmjopen-2021-058428Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping reviewMichael John Norton0Health Service Executive, Dublin, IrelandIntroduction Since the turn of the millennium, recovery has become mainstream in mental health services across much of the Western world. Resulting from this, many jurisdictions, including Ireland, have created frameworks and policies to support its integration into traditionally, statutory mental health services. Coproduction is a cornerstone of recovery. However, there is confusion about what the term means, along with queries surrounding its implementation. Consequently, studies have identified that coproduction compliments recovery in several ways. This has been found to have a positive impact on a service user’s ongoing recovery journey. However, no synthesis has yet been undertaken into coproduction within mental health service provision. As such, this protocol aimed to provide information on a scoping review to examine the evidence base for coproduction within mental health service provision.Methods and analysis A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis compliant scoping review is proposed, based on Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. This framework documents a five-stage approach to conducting scoping reviews. Search terms are stated and a variety of databases (CINAHL, Jstor, Ovid SP, PsycINFO, PsycTEST, PubMed, RCNi, Science Direct, Web of Science and Wiley Online Library) and repositories (Cochrane Online Library, ETHos, nz.research.org.nz, ProQuest, National ETD Portal, Google, Google Scholar and ResearchGate) will be examined for papers based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. The search range is from 1 January 1970 to 31 December 2021.Ethics and dissemination This paper is a protocol which requires no ethical approval. Information relating to the review is stored with OSF Registries, where it is freely available. The protocol details were updated in February and again in May 2022. The resulting scoping review will be distributed through peer-reviewed publications.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/5/e058428.full
spellingShingle Michael John Norton
Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping review
BMJ Open
title Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping review
title_full Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping review
title_short Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping review
title_sort coproduction and mental health service provision a protocol for a scoping review
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/5/e058428.full
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeljohnnorton coproductionandmentalhealthserviceprovisionaprotocolforascopingreview