Evaluation of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune-checkpoint inhibition
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized melanoma treatment, yet approximately half of patients do not respond to these therapies. Identifying prognostic biomarkers is crucial for treatment decisions. Our retrospective study assessed liquid biopsies and tumor tissue analyses for two p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2025-02-01
|
Series: | Translational Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324003504 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832591836349202432 |
---|---|
author | Yasmin F Melzer Nadine L Fergen Christian Mess Julia-Christina Stadler Glenn Geidel Ysabel A Schwietzer Julian Kött Klaus Pantel Stefan W Schneider Jochen Utikal Ewa Wladykowski Sabine Vidal-y-Sy Alexander T Bauer Christoffer Gebhardt |
author_facet | Yasmin F Melzer Nadine L Fergen Christian Mess Julia-Christina Stadler Glenn Geidel Ysabel A Schwietzer Julian Kött Klaus Pantel Stefan W Schneider Jochen Utikal Ewa Wladykowski Sabine Vidal-y-Sy Alexander T Bauer Christoffer Gebhardt |
author_sort | Yasmin F Melzer |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized melanoma treatment, yet approximately half of patients do not respond to these therapies. Identifying prognostic biomarkers is crucial for treatment decisions. Our retrospective study assessed liquid biopsies and tumor tissue analyses for two potential biomarkers: danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) S100A8/A9 and its source, neutrophils. In 43 metastatic unresected stage III/IV melanoma patients, elevated serum levels of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils before and during ICI treatment correlated with worse outcomes. Furthermore, in 113 melanoma patients, neutrophil expression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) was associated with relapse and reduced survival. Measuring S100A8/A9 and neutrophils could enhance immunotherapy monitoring by predicting impaired clinical outcomes and non-response to ICIs. Serum S100A8/A9 levels and neutrophil counts at baseline (T0) and during treatment (T3) correlated with reduced progression-free survival (PFS). Elevated S100A8/A9 levels at T0 and T3 negatively impacted overall survival (OS). Notably, neutrophil infiltration was more prevalent in primary melanomas than in nevi and metastases, and its presence in primary melanomas was linked to poorer survival. S100A8/A9 serum levels, neutrophil counts, and tumor-associated neutrophil infiltration represent promising biomarkers for predicting treatment response and clinical outcomes in melanoma patients receiving ICIs. Significance: These findings underscore the critical need for reliable biomarkers in melanoma research, particularly for predicting responses to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Identifying S100A8/A9 levels and neutrophil infiltration as potential indicators of treatment outcomes offers valuable insights for personalized therapy decisions. By enhancing monitoring and prognosis assessment, these biomarkers contribute to refining treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes. This research bridges gaps in understanding melanoma response mechanisms and highlights avenues for further investigation into immune-related markers, fostering advancements in precision medicine for melanoma patients. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-4ffc909d0b774f0c9be174be9efbdca1 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1936-5233 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Translational Oncology |
spelling | doaj-art-4ffc909d0b774f0c9be174be9efbdca12025-01-22T05:41:23ZengElsevierTranslational Oncology1936-52332025-02-0152102224Evaluation of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune-checkpoint inhibitionYasmin F Melzer0Nadine L Fergen1Christian Mess2Julia-Christina Stadler3Glenn Geidel4Ysabel A Schwietzer5Julian Kött6Klaus Pantel7Stefan W Schneider8Jochen Utikal9Ewa Wladykowski10Sabine Vidal-y-Sy11Alexander T Bauer12Christoffer Gebhardt13Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyFleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Department of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanySkin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Corresponding author.Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized melanoma treatment, yet approximately half of patients do not respond to these therapies. Identifying prognostic biomarkers is crucial for treatment decisions. Our retrospective study assessed liquid biopsies and tumor tissue analyses for two potential biomarkers: danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) S100A8/A9 and its source, neutrophils. In 43 metastatic unresected stage III/IV melanoma patients, elevated serum levels of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils before and during ICI treatment correlated with worse outcomes. Furthermore, in 113 melanoma patients, neutrophil expression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) was associated with relapse and reduced survival. Measuring S100A8/A9 and neutrophils could enhance immunotherapy monitoring by predicting impaired clinical outcomes and non-response to ICIs. Serum S100A8/A9 levels and neutrophil counts at baseline (T0) and during treatment (T3) correlated with reduced progression-free survival (PFS). Elevated S100A8/A9 levels at T0 and T3 negatively impacted overall survival (OS). Notably, neutrophil infiltration was more prevalent in primary melanomas than in nevi and metastases, and its presence in primary melanomas was linked to poorer survival. S100A8/A9 serum levels, neutrophil counts, and tumor-associated neutrophil infiltration represent promising biomarkers for predicting treatment response and clinical outcomes in melanoma patients receiving ICIs. Significance: These findings underscore the critical need for reliable biomarkers in melanoma research, particularly for predicting responses to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Identifying S100A8/A9 levels and neutrophil infiltration as potential indicators of treatment outcomes offers valuable insights for personalized therapy decisions. By enhancing monitoring and prognosis assessment, these biomarkers contribute to refining treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes. This research bridges gaps in understanding melanoma response mechanisms and highlights avenues for further investigation into immune-related markers, fostering advancements in precision medicine for melanoma patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324003504MelanomaImmune-checkpoint inhibitorsNeutrophilsS100A8/A9InflammationTumor progression |
spellingShingle | Yasmin F Melzer Nadine L Fergen Christian Mess Julia-Christina Stadler Glenn Geidel Ysabel A Schwietzer Julian Kött Klaus Pantel Stefan W Schneider Jochen Utikal Ewa Wladykowski Sabine Vidal-y-Sy Alexander T Bauer Christoffer Gebhardt Evaluation of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune-checkpoint inhibition Translational Oncology Melanoma Immune-checkpoint inhibitors Neutrophils S100A8/A9 Inflammation Tumor progression |
title | Evaluation of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune-checkpoint inhibition |
title_full | Evaluation of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune-checkpoint inhibition |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune-checkpoint inhibition |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune-checkpoint inhibition |
title_short | Evaluation of S100A8/A9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune-checkpoint inhibition |
title_sort | evaluation of s100a8 a9 and neutrophils as prognostic markers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune checkpoint inhibition |
topic | Melanoma Immune-checkpoint inhibitors Neutrophils S100A8/A9 Inflammation Tumor progression |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324003504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yasminfmelzer evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT nadinelfergen evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT christianmess evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT juliachristinastadler evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT glenngeidel evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT ysabelaschwietzer evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT juliankott evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT klauspantel evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT stefanwschneider evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT jochenutikal evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT ewawladykowski evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT sabinevidalysy evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT alexandertbauer evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition AT christoffergebhardt evaluationofs100a8a9andneutrophilsasprognosticmarkersinmetastaticmelanomapatientsunderimmunecheckpointinhibition |