Circulating Galectin-3 and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: A Meta-Analysis

Background. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is involved in fibrosis and heart failure. However, epidemiological studies evaluating the association between Gal-3 and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation showed inconsistent results. We conducted a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guangping Zhang, Yongquan Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Cardiovascular Therapeutics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4148129
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559343385444352
author Guangping Zhang
Yongquan Wu
author_facet Guangping Zhang
Yongquan Wu
author_sort Guangping Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Background. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is involved in fibrosis and heart failure. However, epidemiological studies evaluating the association between Gal-3 and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation showed inconsistent results. We conducted a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the relationship between baseline circulating Gal-3 levels and AF recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation. Methods. Relevant studies were identified by systematically searching the PubMed and Embase databases. A random-effect model was used to synthesize the results. Sensitivity analyses, performed by omitting one study at a time, were used to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results. Seven prospective cohort studies including 645 AF patients were included. Within a follow-up duration of up to 18 months, 244 patients developed AF recurrence. Pooled results showed that baseline circulating Gal-3 levels were significantly higher in patients with AF recurrence compared to those without (standardized mean difference: 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21 - 1.27; p = 0.007; I2 = 89%). Moreover, higher baseline Gal-3 levels were independently associated with a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence after catheter ablation (risk ratio: 1.17 per unit of Gal-3; 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.35; p = 0.03; I2 = 40%), which was independent of age, gender, and left atrial dimension. Sensitivity analyses did not significantly affect the results. However, there was a significant publication bias for predicting efficacy of associating preprocedural Gal-3 levels with AF recurrence. Conclusions. Higher preprocedural Gal-3 levels may be associated with increased risk of AF recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation.
format Article
id doaj-art-4ff1b2a56a0c499eb9a767f9e1015ae0
institution Kabale University
issn 1755-5914
1755-5922
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cardiovascular Therapeutics
spelling doaj-art-4ff1b2a56a0c499eb9a767f9e1015ae02025-02-03T01:30:15ZengWileyCardiovascular Therapeutics1755-59141755-59222019-01-01201910.1155/2019/41481294148129Circulating Galectin-3 and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: A Meta-AnalysisGuangping Zhang0Yongquan Wu1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaBackground. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is involved in fibrosis and heart failure. However, epidemiological studies evaluating the association between Gal-3 and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation showed inconsistent results. We conducted a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the relationship between baseline circulating Gal-3 levels and AF recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation. Methods. Relevant studies were identified by systematically searching the PubMed and Embase databases. A random-effect model was used to synthesize the results. Sensitivity analyses, performed by omitting one study at a time, were used to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results. Seven prospective cohort studies including 645 AF patients were included. Within a follow-up duration of up to 18 months, 244 patients developed AF recurrence. Pooled results showed that baseline circulating Gal-3 levels were significantly higher in patients with AF recurrence compared to those without (standardized mean difference: 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21 - 1.27; p = 0.007; I2 = 89%). Moreover, higher baseline Gal-3 levels were independently associated with a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence after catheter ablation (risk ratio: 1.17 per unit of Gal-3; 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.35; p = 0.03; I2 = 40%), which was independent of age, gender, and left atrial dimension. Sensitivity analyses did not significantly affect the results. However, there was a significant publication bias for predicting efficacy of associating preprocedural Gal-3 levels with AF recurrence. Conclusions. Higher preprocedural Gal-3 levels may be associated with increased risk of AF recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4148129
spellingShingle Guangping Zhang
Yongquan Wu
Circulating Galectin-3 and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: A Meta-Analysis
Cardiovascular Therapeutics
title Circulating Galectin-3 and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Circulating Galectin-3 and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Circulating Galectin-3 and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Circulating Galectin-3 and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Circulating Galectin-3 and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort circulating galectin 3 and atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation a meta analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4148129
work_keys_str_mv AT guangpingzhang circulatinggalectin3andatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablationametaanalysis
AT yongquanwu circulatinggalectin3andatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablationametaanalysis