Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

<h4>Purpose</h4>The impact of non-fixation of mesh in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair has not been fully assessed. The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively compare the clinical outcomes of non-fixation and fixation of mesh in TAPP to determine wheth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ChenXin Zhang, Jia Li, HaiJin Suo, JianPing Bai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314334
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850251577338626048
author ChenXin Zhang
Jia Li
HaiJin Suo
JianPing Bai
author_facet ChenXin Zhang
Jia Li
HaiJin Suo
JianPing Bai
author_sort ChenXin Zhang
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Purpose</h4>The impact of non-fixation of mesh in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair has not been fully assessed. The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively compare the clinical outcomes of non-fixation and fixation of mesh in TAPP to determine whether non-fixation could affect the outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL were searched for studies on TAPP repair of inguinal hernia and mesh fixation published up to June 2023. The literature search was completed on June 22, 2023. Randomized controlled trials that compared perioperative outcomes between mesh fixation and non-fixation without using self-gripping mesh were included. The primary outcome measures were recurrence and evaluation of postoperative pain, while secondary outcome measures included time to normal activity, infection rate and formation of seroma. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analysis were also conducted.<h4>Results</h4>Six randomized controlled trials were included, involving 679 patients who underwent TAPP with non-fixation and 964 patients with fixation of mesh. There was no significant difference in recurrence between the two groups (RR: 0.83; 95% CI, 0.29-2.39, P = 0.73). The non-fixation group had less pain than the fixation group at 6 months postoperatively (MD: -0.16; 95% CI, -0.23--0.10, P < 0.0001). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the time to return to normal activity or rates of infection or seroma formation between the two groups (MD: -4.95; 95% CI, -11.36-1.45, P = 0.13; RR: 1.18; 95% CI, 0.39-3.62, P = 0.77; RR: 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.40, P = 0.75).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Based on the current evidence, non-fixation without using self-gripping mesh may not affect the efficacy of TAPP. It does not increase recurrence rate and may result in less postoperative pain in inguinal hernia with small hernia defect (less than 3cm).
format Article
id doaj-art-4fbd3cc17f0a4df5928122e8a2cf0754
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-4fbd3cc17f0a4df5928122e8a2cf07542025-08-20T01:57:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e031433410.1371/journal.pone.0314334Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.ChenXin ZhangJia LiHaiJin SuoJianPing Bai<h4>Purpose</h4>The impact of non-fixation of mesh in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair has not been fully assessed. The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively compare the clinical outcomes of non-fixation and fixation of mesh in TAPP to determine whether non-fixation could affect the outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL were searched for studies on TAPP repair of inguinal hernia and mesh fixation published up to June 2023. The literature search was completed on June 22, 2023. Randomized controlled trials that compared perioperative outcomes between mesh fixation and non-fixation without using self-gripping mesh were included. The primary outcome measures were recurrence and evaluation of postoperative pain, while secondary outcome measures included time to normal activity, infection rate and formation of seroma. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analysis were also conducted.<h4>Results</h4>Six randomized controlled trials were included, involving 679 patients who underwent TAPP with non-fixation and 964 patients with fixation of mesh. There was no significant difference in recurrence between the two groups (RR: 0.83; 95% CI, 0.29-2.39, P = 0.73). The non-fixation group had less pain than the fixation group at 6 months postoperatively (MD: -0.16; 95% CI, -0.23--0.10, P < 0.0001). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the time to return to normal activity or rates of infection or seroma formation between the two groups (MD: -4.95; 95% CI, -11.36-1.45, P = 0.13; RR: 1.18; 95% CI, 0.39-3.62, P = 0.77; RR: 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.40, P = 0.75).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Based on the current evidence, non-fixation without using self-gripping mesh may not affect the efficacy of TAPP. It does not increase recurrence rate and may result in less postoperative pain in inguinal hernia with small hernia defect (less than 3cm).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314334
spellingShingle ChenXin Zhang
Jia Li
HaiJin Suo
JianPing Bai
Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
PLoS ONE
title Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_fullStr Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_short Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_sort non fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314334
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxinzhang nonfixationversusfixationofmeshinlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairofinguinalherniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jiali nonfixationversusfixationofmeshinlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairofinguinalherniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT haijinsuo nonfixationversusfixationofmeshinlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairofinguinalherniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jianpingbai nonfixationversusfixationofmeshinlaparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairofinguinalherniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials