RTCi versus OSBC teaching method in eight-year medical program: a randomized, controlled educational research

Abstract Background Under the standardized educational research model, a multicentre, randomized controlled educational research was conducted to compare the efficacy of the research, teaching and clinical integration (RTCi) and organ system-based curriculum (OSBC) teaching methods in the eight-year...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lu Wang, Ben Zhao, Xiaohui Wang, Minghao Guo, Lei Dou, Yinan Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07641-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849342439325696000
author Lu Wang
Ben Zhao
Xiaohui Wang
Minghao Guo
Lu Wang
Lei Dou
Yinan Sun
author_facet Lu Wang
Ben Zhao
Xiaohui Wang
Minghao Guo
Lu Wang
Lei Dou
Yinan Sun
author_sort Lu Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Under the standardized educational research model, a multicentre, randomized controlled educational research was conducted to compare the efficacy of the research, teaching and clinical integration (RTCi) and organ system-based curriculum (OSBC) teaching methods in the eight-year medical program. Methods A total of 230 eight-year medical program participants from two clinical colleges signed informed consent for educational research, were randomly divided into the RTCi teaching group (N = 115) and the OSBC teaching group (N = 115) and underwent a one-year study under different teaching methods. The two groups were compared in terms of on-schedule graduation, the number of papers published per student, grade-weighted scores and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) scores. Results The 230 participants were randomly divided into two groups. After one year of RTCi or OSBC teaching, the on-schedule graduation rate of the RTCi group was significantly higher than that of the OSBC group (90% vs. 70%, P = 0.006). The average number of papers published per student in the RTCi group was significantly greater than that in the OSBC group (1.3 vs. 0.7, P = 0.017). The study score of the RTCi group was greater than that of the OSBC group (85.6 vs. 85.2, P = 0.183), although the difference was not statistically significant. The OSCE score of the RTCi group was significantly greater than that of the OSBC group (93 vs. 90, P = 0.029). Conclusions In the multicentre randomized controlled teaching study, compared with the OSBC teaching method, the RTCi teaching method significantly improved the on-schedule graduation rate, the number of published papers and the OSCE scores of participants. In terms of study scores, the RTCi teaching method outperformed the OSBC method, with no statistically significant difference. The RTCi teaching method is more conducive to the training and comprehensive development of eight-year medical program participants. In practice, medical education institutions could consider adopting the RTCi teaching method to enhance educational outcomes. Future research should further explore its long-term impact on the career development of medical graduates to strengthen its applicability and sustainability in eight-year medical program.
format Article
id doaj-art-4fb46c4bf3fe4250841bde0dd85dbf2f
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6920
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Education
spelling doaj-art-4fb46c4bf3fe4250841bde0dd85dbf2f2025-08-20T03:43:22ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202025-07-012511610.1186/s12909-025-07641-6RTCi versus OSBC teaching method in eight-year medical program: a randomized, controlled educational researchLu Wang0Ben Zhao1Xiaohui Wang2Minghao Guo3Lu Wang4Lei Dou5Yinan Sun6Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyThe Center for Biomedical Research, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pharmacy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Geriatrics&Department of Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical college, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Background Under the standardized educational research model, a multicentre, randomized controlled educational research was conducted to compare the efficacy of the research, teaching and clinical integration (RTCi) and organ system-based curriculum (OSBC) teaching methods in the eight-year medical program. Methods A total of 230 eight-year medical program participants from two clinical colleges signed informed consent for educational research, were randomly divided into the RTCi teaching group (N = 115) and the OSBC teaching group (N = 115) and underwent a one-year study under different teaching methods. The two groups were compared in terms of on-schedule graduation, the number of papers published per student, grade-weighted scores and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) scores. Results The 230 participants were randomly divided into two groups. After one year of RTCi or OSBC teaching, the on-schedule graduation rate of the RTCi group was significantly higher than that of the OSBC group (90% vs. 70%, P = 0.006). The average number of papers published per student in the RTCi group was significantly greater than that in the OSBC group (1.3 vs. 0.7, P = 0.017). The study score of the RTCi group was greater than that of the OSBC group (85.6 vs. 85.2, P = 0.183), although the difference was not statistically significant. The OSCE score of the RTCi group was significantly greater than that of the OSBC group (93 vs. 90, P = 0.029). Conclusions In the multicentre randomized controlled teaching study, compared with the OSBC teaching method, the RTCi teaching method significantly improved the on-schedule graduation rate, the number of published papers and the OSCE scores of participants. In terms of study scores, the RTCi teaching method outperformed the OSBC method, with no statistically significant difference. The RTCi teaching method is more conducive to the training and comprehensive development of eight-year medical program participants. In practice, medical education institutions could consider adopting the RTCi teaching method to enhance educational outcomes. Future research should further explore its long-term impact on the career development of medical graduates to strengthen its applicability and sustainability in eight-year medical program.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07641-6Medical education research standardsRTCi teaching methodOSBC teaching method
spellingShingle Lu Wang
Ben Zhao
Xiaohui Wang
Minghao Guo
Lu Wang
Lei Dou
Yinan Sun
RTCi versus OSBC teaching method in eight-year medical program: a randomized, controlled educational research
BMC Medical Education
Medical education research standards
RTCi teaching method
OSBC teaching method
title RTCi versus OSBC teaching method in eight-year medical program: a randomized, controlled educational research
title_full RTCi versus OSBC teaching method in eight-year medical program: a randomized, controlled educational research
title_fullStr RTCi versus OSBC teaching method in eight-year medical program: a randomized, controlled educational research
title_full_unstemmed RTCi versus OSBC teaching method in eight-year medical program: a randomized, controlled educational research
title_short RTCi versus OSBC teaching method in eight-year medical program: a randomized, controlled educational research
title_sort rtci versus osbc teaching method in eight year medical program a randomized controlled educational research
topic Medical education research standards
RTCi teaching method
OSBC teaching method
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07641-6
work_keys_str_mv AT luwang rtciversusosbcteachingmethodineightyearmedicalprogramarandomizedcontrollededucationalresearch
AT benzhao rtciversusosbcteachingmethodineightyearmedicalprogramarandomizedcontrollededucationalresearch
AT xiaohuiwang rtciversusosbcteachingmethodineightyearmedicalprogramarandomizedcontrollededucationalresearch
AT minghaoguo rtciversusosbcteachingmethodineightyearmedicalprogramarandomizedcontrollededucationalresearch
AT luwang rtciversusosbcteachingmethodineightyearmedicalprogramarandomizedcontrollededucationalresearch
AT leidou rtciversusosbcteachingmethodineightyearmedicalprogramarandomizedcontrollededucationalresearch
AT yinansun rtciversusosbcteachingmethodineightyearmedicalprogramarandomizedcontrollededucationalresearch