Diagnosis of carbon monoxide exposure in clinical research and practice: A scoping review.
<h4>Objective</h4>To undertake a scoping review to identify methods and diagnostic levels used in determining unintentional, non-fire related carbon monoxide exposure.<h4>Design</h4>Online databases and grey literature were searched from 1946 to 2023 identifying 80 papers whe...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300989 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | <h4>Objective</h4>To undertake a scoping review to identify methods and diagnostic levels used in determining unintentional, non-fire related carbon monoxide exposure.<h4>Design</h4>Online databases and grey literature were searched from 1946 to 2023 identifying 80 papers where carbon monoxide levels were reported.<h4>Results</h4>80 papers were included; 71 research studies and 9 clinical guidelines. Four methods were described: blood carboxyhaemoglobin (arterial or venous blood analysis), carbon monoxide oximetry (SpO2), expired carbon monoxide, and ambient carbon monoxide sampling. Blood analysis methods predominated (60.0% of the papers). Multiple methods of measurement were used in 26 (32.5%) of the papers. Diagnostic levels for carboxyhaemoglobin were described in 54 (67.5%) papers, ranging between 2% and 15%. 26 (32.5%) papers reported diagnostic levels that were adjusted for the smoking status of the patient.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Four methods were found for use in different settings. Variability in diagnostic thresholds impairs diagnostic accuracy. Agreement on standardised diagnostic levels is required to enable consistent diagnosis of unintentional, non-fire related carbon monoxide exposure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |