Disability, Self-Representation, and Care

In this paper, I examine the implications that the often-used slogan of disability rights, “Nothing about us without us,” has for our understanding of disability identity. I argue that externally labeling a person as disabled violates the principle of self-representation that is at the core of comm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: T.J. Buttgereit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Western Ontario 2025-03-01
Series:Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/16832
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849762536933556224
author T.J. Buttgereit
author_facet T.J. Buttgereit
author_sort T.J. Buttgereit
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, I examine the implications that the often-used slogan of disability rights, “Nothing about us without us,” has for our understanding of disability identity. I argue that externally labeling a person as disabled violates the principle of self-representation that is at the core of commitment to disability justice. But this concept of self-representation is complicated when we consider those deemed disabled who are incapable of communicating or perhaps even forming a disability identity. With these individuals in mind, I ask, How can self-representation be violated when a person is incapable of forming their own identity? What if external labeling is necessary for caregivers to provide care to their charges? In raising these questions, I seek to highlight how cases of noncommunicative individuals challenge us to rearticulate the meaning of self-identification and recognize the injustice of violating it, even when other obligations to them demand that we do so.
format Article
id doaj-art-4f6a0cec7c9a4e90ad5c27a220016dfa
institution DOAJ
issn 2371-2570
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher University of Western Ontario
record_format Article
series Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
spelling doaj-art-4f6a0cec7c9a4e90ad5c27a220016dfa2025-08-20T03:05:42ZengUniversity of Western OntarioFeminist Philosophy Quarterly2371-25702025-03-01111Disability, Self-Representation, and CareT.J. Buttgereit0Binghamton University In this paper, I examine the implications that the often-used slogan of disability rights, “Nothing about us without us,” has for our understanding of disability identity. I argue that externally labeling a person as disabled violates the principle of self-representation that is at the core of commitment to disability justice. But this concept of self-representation is complicated when we consider those deemed disabled who are incapable of communicating or perhaps even forming a disability identity. With these individuals in mind, I ask, How can self-representation be violated when a person is incapable of forming their own identity? What if external labeling is necessary for caregivers to provide care to their charges? In raising these questions, I seek to highlight how cases of noncommunicative individuals challenge us to rearticulate the meaning of self-identification and recognize the injustice of violating it, even when other obligations to them demand that we do so. https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/16832disability identityself-representationcare ethicsdisability studies
spellingShingle T.J. Buttgereit
Disability, Self-Representation, and Care
Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
disability identity
self-representation
care ethics
disability studies
title Disability, Self-Representation, and Care
title_full Disability, Self-Representation, and Care
title_fullStr Disability, Self-Representation, and Care
title_full_unstemmed Disability, Self-Representation, and Care
title_short Disability, Self-Representation, and Care
title_sort disability self representation and care
topic disability identity
self-representation
care ethics
disability studies
url https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/16832
work_keys_str_mv AT tjbuttgereit disabilityselfrepresentationandcare