Measuring functioning and disability in Korea: comparing general and dedicated surveys using the ICF as a reference framework.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Functioning is the third health indicator besides mortality and morbidity. Although Korea periodically collects functioning information, the functioning indicator has not been generated yet. This study aimed to evaluate how functioning information is currently collec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiin Kim, Melissa Selb, Youngtae Cho, Wanho Kim, Carla Sabariego
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323616
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850270578720636928
author Jiin Kim
Melissa Selb
Youngtae Cho
Wanho Kim
Carla Sabariego
author_facet Jiin Kim
Melissa Selb
Youngtae Cho
Wanho Kim
Carla Sabariego
author_sort Jiin Kim
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Functioning is the third health indicator besides mortality and morbidity. Although Korea periodically collects functioning information, the functioning indicator has not been generated yet. This study aimed to evaluate how functioning information is currently collected in Korea's health and disability surveys, especially in terms of comparability and comprehensiveness, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference framework.<h4>Methods</h4>Data sources included three health and disability surveys in Korea, namely the Population and Housing Census, the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and the Survey on the Living condition of Persons with Disabilities, and two international ICF-based surveys, the International Spinal Cord Injury Survey and the Model Disability Survey. Functioning information was linked by category to the ICF Generic-30 Set utilizing the ICF linking rules.<h4>Results</h4>Three ICF categories - d450 walking; d510 washing oneself; d540 dressing ̶ were covered by all the data sources. Excluding the Population and Housing Census, which inherently differs from the other data sources, all the surveys addressed six ICF categories - b152 emotional functions; b280 sensation of pain; d240 handling stress and other psychological demands; d450 walking; d510 washing oneself; d540 dressing. The ICF categories b152 emotional functions and b130 energy and drive functions were the most frequently covered across all the surveys. Despite of the common ICF categories, important differences in the operationalization of questions and response options were found.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The overlap of content of health and disability surveys in Korea enables interoperability with other data sources. Available functioning data can be used for estimating the functioning indicator and metric, as recommended by WHO, which can serve as a valuable epidemiological indicator for complementing mortality and morbidity indicators and for estimating and monitoring rehabilitation or long-term care needs of the Korean population.
format Article
id doaj-art-4eee3900f7b841768b68541c930fc48b
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-4eee3900f7b841768b68541c930fc48b2025-08-20T01:52:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01205e032361610.1371/journal.pone.0323616Measuring functioning and disability in Korea: comparing general and dedicated surveys using the ICF as a reference framework.Jiin KimMelissa SelbYoungtae ChoWanho KimCarla Sabariego<h4>Introduction</h4>Functioning is the third health indicator besides mortality and morbidity. Although Korea periodically collects functioning information, the functioning indicator has not been generated yet. This study aimed to evaluate how functioning information is currently collected in Korea's health and disability surveys, especially in terms of comparability and comprehensiveness, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference framework.<h4>Methods</h4>Data sources included three health and disability surveys in Korea, namely the Population and Housing Census, the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and the Survey on the Living condition of Persons with Disabilities, and two international ICF-based surveys, the International Spinal Cord Injury Survey and the Model Disability Survey. Functioning information was linked by category to the ICF Generic-30 Set utilizing the ICF linking rules.<h4>Results</h4>Three ICF categories - d450 walking; d510 washing oneself; d540 dressing ̶ were covered by all the data sources. Excluding the Population and Housing Census, which inherently differs from the other data sources, all the surveys addressed six ICF categories - b152 emotional functions; b280 sensation of pain; d240 handling stress and other psychological demands; d450 walking; d510 washing oneself; d540 dressing. The ICF categories b152 emotional functions and b130 energy and drive functions were the most frequently covered across all the surveys. Despite of the common ICF categories, important differences in the operationalization of questions and response options were found.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The overlap of content of health and disability surveys in Korea enables interoperability with other data sources. Available functioning data can be used for estimating the functioning indicator and metric, as recommended by WHO, which can serve as a valuable epidemiological indicator for complementing mortality and morbidity indicators and for estimating and monitoring rehabilitation or long-term care needs of the Korean population.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323616
spellingShingle Jiin Kim
Melissa Selb
Youngtae Cho
Wanho Kim
Carla Sabariego
Measuring functioning and disability in Korea: comparing general and dedicated surveys using the ICF as a reference framework.
PLoS ONE
title Measuring functioning and disability in Korea: comparing general and dedicated surveys using the ICF as a reference framework.
title_full Measuring functioning and disability in Korea: comparing general and dedicated surveys using the ICF as a reference framework.
title_fullStr Measuring functioning and disability in Korea: comparing general and dedicated surveys using the ICF as a reference framework.
title_full_unstemmed Measuring functioning and disability in Korea: comparing general and dedicated surveys using the ICF as a reference framework.
title_short Measuring functioning and disability in Korea: comparing general and dedicated surveys using the ICF as a reference framework.
title_sort measuring functioning and disability in korea comparing general and dedicated surveys using the icf as a reference framework
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323616
work_keys_str_mv AT jiinkim measuringfunctioninganddisabilityinkoreacomparinggeneralanddedicatedsurveysusingtheicfasareferenceframework
AT melissaselb measuringfunctioninganddisabilityinkoreacomparinggeneralanddedicatedsurveysusingtheicfasareferenceframework
AT youngtaecho measuringfunctioninganddisabilityinkoreacomparinggeneralanddedicatedsurveysusingtheicfasareferenceframework
AT wanhokim measuringfunctioninganddisabilityinkoreacomparinggeneralanddedicatedsurveysusingtheicfasareferenceframework
AT carlasabariego measuringfunctioninganddisabilityinkoreacomparinggeneralanddedicatedsurveysusingtheicfasareferenceframework