Expert advice from ResearchMatch volunteers: Recruitment Innovation Center use cases and innovation

Involving participants in the design of clinical trials should improve the overall success of a study. For this to occur, streamlined mechanisms are needed to connect the populations potentially impacted by a given study or health topic with research teams in order to inform trial design in a meanin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maeve Tischbein, Sarah K. Cook, Cathy Shyr, Katelyn Benhoff, Amna Baig, Kaysi Quarles, Leslie R. Boone, Loretta M. Byrne, Mariela Rodriguez, Terri Edwards, Consuelo H. Wilkins, Paul A. Harris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124006599/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841526341834375168
author Maeve Tischbein
Sarah K. Cook
Cathy Shyr
Katelyn Benhoff
Amna Baig
Kaysi Quarles
Leslie R. Boone
Loretta M. Byrne
Mariela Rodriguez
Terri Edwards
Consuelo H. Wilkins
Paul A. Harris
author_facet Maeve Tischbein
Sarah K. Cook
Cathy Shyr
Katelyn Benhoff
Amna Baig
Kaysi Quarles
Leslie R. Boone
Loretta M. Byrne
Mariela Rodriguez
Terri Edwards
Consuelo H. Wilkins
Paul A. Harris
author_sort Maeve Tischbein
collection DOAJ
description Involving participants in the design of clinical trials should improve the overall success of a study. For this to occur, streamlined mechanisms are needed to connect the populations potentially impacted by a given study or health topic with research teams in order to inform trial design in a meaningful and timely manner. To address this need, we developed an innovative mechanism called the “ResearchMatch Expert Advice Tool” that quickly obtains volunteer perspectives from populations with specific health conditions or lived experiences using the national recruitment registry, ResearchMatch. This tool does not ask volunteers to participate in the trial but allows for wider community feedback to be gathered and translated into actionable recommendations used to inform the study’s design. We describe early use cases that shaped the current Expert Advice Tool workflow, how results from this tool were incorporated and implemented by studies, and feedback from volunteers and study teams regarding the tool’s usefulness. Additionally, we present a set of lessons learned during the development of the Expert Advice Tool that can be used by other recruitment registries seeking to obtain volunteer feedback on study design and operations.
format Article
id doaj-art-4ec31bc8fd03492396e14a3d6158fa7b
institution Kabale University
issn 2059-8661
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj-art-4ec31bc8fd03492396e14a3d6158fa7b2025-01-16T21:53:23ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612025-01-01810.1017/cts.2024.659Expert advice from ResearchMatch volunteers: Recruitment Innovation Center use cases and innovationMaeve Tischbein0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-0673Sarah K. Cook1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4906-7084Cathy Shyr2Katelyn Benhoff3Amna Baig4Kaysi Quarles5Leslie R. Boone6Loretta M. Byrne7https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0009-1144Mariela Rodriguez8Terri Edwards9Consuelo H. Wilkins10Paul A. Harris11https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1744-2011Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USADepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Internal Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USAVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAInvolving participants in the design of clinical trials should improve the overall success of a study. For this to occur, streamlined mechanisms are needed to connect the populations potentially impacted by a given study or health topic with research teams in order to inform trial design in a meaningful and timely manner. To address this need, we developed an innovative mechanism called the “ResearchMatch Expert Advice Tool” that quickly obtains volunteer perspectives from populations with specific health conditions or lived experiences using the national recruitment registry, ResearchMatch. This tool does not ask volunteers to participate in the trial but allows for wider community feedback to be gathered and translated into actionable recommendations used to inform the study’s design. We describe early use cases that shaped the current Expert Advice Tool workflow, how results from this tool were incorporated and implemented by studies, and feedback from volunteers and study teams regarding the tool’s usefulness. Additionally, we present a set of lessons learned during the development of the Expert Advice Tool that can be used by other recruitment registries seeking to obtain volunteer feedback on study design and operations.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124006599/type/journal_articleParticipant engagementpatient engagementpatient and public involvementparticipant-centered researchstudy design
spellingShingle Maeve Tischbein
Sarah K. Cook
Cathy Shyr
Katelyn Benhoff
Amna Baig
Kaysi Quarles
Leslie R. Boone
Loretta M. Byrne
Mariela Rodriguez
Terri Edwards
Consuelo H. Wilkins
Paul A. Harris
Expert advice from ResearchMatch volunteers: Recruitment Innovation Center use cases and innovation
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Participant engagement
patient engagement
patient and public involvement
participant-centered research
study design
title Expert advice from ResearchMatch volunteers: Recruitment Innovation Center use cases and innovation
title_full Expert advice from ResearchMatch volunteers: Recruitment Innovation Center use cases and innovation
title_fullStr Expert advice from ResearchMatch volunteers: Recruitment Innovation Center use cases and innovation
title_full_unstemmed Expert advice from ResearchMatch volunteers: Recruitment Innovation Center use cases and innovation
title_short Expert advice from ResearchMatch volunteers: Recruitment Innovation Center use cases and innovation
title_sort expert advice from researchmatch volunteers recruitment innovation center use cases and innovation
topic Participant engagement
patient engagement
patient and public involvement
participant-centered research
study design
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124006599/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT maevetischbein expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT sarahkcook expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT cathyshyr expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT katelynbenhoff expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT amnabaig expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT kaysiquarles expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT leslierboone expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT lorettambyrne expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT marielarodriguez expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT terriedwards expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT consuelohwilkins expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation
AT paulaharris expertadvicefromresearchmatchvolunteersrecruitmentinnovationcenterusecasesandinnovation