Benjamin and Koolhaas: History's Afterlife
Dialectical images are at the core of the methods suggested by two books written four decades apart yet published around the same time. The Arcades Project (first published as Das Passagen-Werk in 1981) and Delirious New York (1978) use images to critique established modes of historical interpretati...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
TU Delft OPEN Publishing
2016-04-01
|
Series: | Footprint |
Online Access: | https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/974 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832566125434503168 |
---|---|
author | Frances Hsu |
author_facet | Frances Hsu |
author_sort | Frances Hsu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Dialectical images are at the core of the methods suggested by two books written four decades apart yet published around the same time. The Arcades Project (first published as Das Passagen-Werk in 1981) and Delirious New York (1978) use images to critique established modes of historical interpretation. Each proposes a methodology of historical speculation based on the interpretation of fragmentary visual phenomena. Both construct alternative historical narratives about the impact of technology, mass culture and economy on the city. This essay contrasts and compares the similarities and differences between the respective authors’ treatments of the nineteenth century arcade and the Manhattan skyscraper to examine how the strategies and definitions suggested by Benjamin and Koolhaas address the function of images as tools for critical architectural analysis and knowledge. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-4ebc4d520bca4386a4a19614ff704478 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1875-1504 1875-1490 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016-04-01 |
publisher | TU Delft OPEN Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Footprint |
spelling | doaj-art-4ebc4d520bca4386a4a19614ff7044782025-02-03T01:05:03ZengTU Delft OPEN PublishingFootprint1875-15041875-14902016-04-0110110.7480/footprint.10.1.974Benjamin and Koolhaas: History's AfterlifeFrances Hsu0Aalto UniversityDialectical images are at the core of the methods suggested by two books written four decades apart yet published around the same time. The Arcades Project (first published as Das Passagen-Werk in 1981) and Delirious New York (1978) use images to critique established modes of historical interpretation. Each proposes a methodology of historical speculation based on the interpretation of fragmentary visual phenomena. Both construct alternative historical narratives about the impact of technology, mass culture and economy on the city. This essay contrasts and compares the similarities and differences between the respective authors’ treatments of the nineteenth century arcade and the Manhattan skyscraper to examine how the strategies and definitions suggested by Benjamin and Koolhaas address the function of images as tools for critical architectural analysis and knowledge.https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/974 |
spellingShingle | Frances Hsu Benjamin and Koolhaas: History's Afterlife Footprint |
title | Benjamin and Koolhaas: History's Afterlife |
title_full | Benjamin and Koolhaas: History's Afterlife |
title_fullStr | Benjamin and Koolhaas: History's Afterlife |
title_full_unstemmed | Benjamin and Koolhaas: History's Afterlife |
title_short | Benjamin and Koolhaas: History's Afterlife |
title_sort | benjamin and koolhaas history s afterlife |
url | https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/974 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franceshsu benjaminandkoolhaashistorysafterlife |