Analysis of indications for selectively missing results in comparative registry-based studies in medicine: a meta-research study
Abstract Background We assess if there are indications that results of registry-based studies comparing the effectiveness of interventions might be selectively missing depending on the statistical significance (p < 0.05). Methods Eligibility criteria Sample of cohort type studies that used data f...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Paula Starke, Zhentian Zhang, Hannah Papmeier, Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Research Integrity and Peer Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00159-x |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Investigation of reporting bias in interrupted time series (ITS) studies: a study protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Matthew J. Page, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Reliability of Positive and Negative Life Experiences Reported by Inmates: A Pilot Study
by: Cristina Fernandes, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review
by: Julia Schifano, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types
by: Arthur M. Holt, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Exploring the publication gap in pediatric randomized clinical trials: completed vs. uncompleted pediatric clinical trials
by: Katerina Nebeska, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01)