Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background. In pediatric patients with severe COVID-19, if the respiratory support provided using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) becomes insufficient, no definitive evidence exists to support the escalation to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or mechanical ventilation (MV). Case Presentation. A 9-year-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ke-Yun Chao, Chao-Yu Chen, Xiao-Ru Ji, Shu-Chi Mu, Yu-Hsuan Chien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Pediatrics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/5519254
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832569114834501632
author Ke-Yun Chao
Chao-Yu Chen
Xiao-Ru Ji
Shu-Chi Mu
Yu-Hsuan Chien
author_facet Ke-Yun Chao
Chao-Yu Chen
Xiao-Ru Ji
Shu-Chi Mu
Yu-Hsuan Chien
author_sort Ke-Yun Chao
collection DOAJ
description Background. In pediatric patients with severe COVID-19, if the respiratory support provided using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) becomes insufficient, no definitive evidence exists to support the escalation to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or mechanical ventilation (MV). Case Presentation. A 9-year-old boy being treated with face mask-delivered biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation developed fever, tachypnea, and frequent desaturation. The COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test and urine antigen test for Streptococcus pneumoniae were both positive, and sputum culture yielded Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The do-not-resuscitate order precluded the use of endotracheal intubation. After 2 h of HFNC support, the respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index declined from 7.86 to 3.71, indicating impending HFNC failure. A helmet was used to deliver NIV, and SpO2 was maintained at >90%. Dyspnea and desaturation gradually improved, and the patient was switched to HFNC 6 days later and discharged 10 days later. Conclusion. In some cases, acute respiratory distress syndrome severity cannot be measured using the oxygenation index or oxygenation saturation index, and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and ROX index may serve as useful alternatives. Although NIV delivered through a facemask or HFNC is more popular than helmet-delivered NIV, in certain circumstances, it can help escalate respiratory support while providing adequate protection to healthcare professionals.
format Article
id doaj-art-4ea0f23eab6546b88b8a0688e3a961f9
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6811
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Pediatrics
spelling doaj-art-4ea0f23eab6546b88b8a0688e3a961f92025-02-02T23:15:16ZengWileyCase Reports in Pediatrics2090-68112024-01-01202410.1155/2024/5519254Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeKe-Yun Chao0Chao-Yu Chen1Xiao-Ru Ji2Shu-Chi Mu3Yu-Hsuan Chien4Department of Respiratory TherapyDepartment of Respiratory TherapyDepartment of PediatricsDepartment of PediatricsDepartment of PediatricsBackground. In pediatric patients with severe COVID-19, if the respiratory support provided using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) becomes insufficient, no definitive evidence exists to support the escalation to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or mechanical ventilation (MV). Case Presentation. A 9-year-old boy being treated with face mask-delivered biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation developed fever, tachypnea, and frequent desaturation. The COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test and urine antigen test for Streptococcus pneumoniae were both positive, and sputum culture yielded Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The do-not-resuscitate order precluded the use of endotracheal intubation. After 2 h of HFNC support, the respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index declined from 7.86 to 3.71, indicating impending HFNC failure. A helmet was used to deliver NIV, and SpO2 was maintained at >90%. Dyspnea and desaturation gradually improved, and the patient was switched to HFNC 6 days later and discharged 10 days later. Conclusion. In some cases, acute respiratory distress syndrome severity cannot be measured using the oxygenation index or oxygenation saturation index, and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and ROX index may serve as useful alternatives. Although NIV delivered through a facemask or HFNC is more popular than helmet-delivered NIV, in certain circumstances, it can help escalate respiratory support while providing adequate protection to healthcare professionals.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/5519254
spellingShingle Ke-Yun Chao
Chao-Yu Chen
Xiao-Ru Ji
Shu-Chi Mu
Yu-Hsuan Chien
Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Case Reports in Pediatrics
title Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_fullStr Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_short Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_sort helmet ventilation in a child with covid 19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/5519254
work_keys_str_mv AT keyunchao helmetventilationinachildwithcovid19andacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT chaoyuchen helmetventilationinachildwithcovid19andacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT xiaoruji helmetventilationinachildwithcovid19andacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT shuchimu helmetventilationinachildwithcovid19andacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT yuhsuanchien helmetventilationinachildwithcovid19andacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome