Accountability in global health systems: insights from a network analysis of Purdue Pharmaceuticals

Abstract Beginning in 1996, Purdue Pharmaceuticals (Purdue) knowingly mislabeled and mass marketed OxyContin (oxycodone), an opioid painkiller, catalyzing the opioid crisis which has been responsible for more than 600 000 deaths in and beyond North America. This case is an extreme example of how tra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Bowra, Amaya Perez-Brumer, Lisa Forman, Jillian Clare Kohler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:Globalization and Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01140-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849388853021900800
author Andrea Bowra
Amaya Perez-Brumer
Lisa Forman
Jillian Clare Kohler
author_facet Andrea Bowra
Amaya Perez-Brumer
Lisa Forman
Jillian Clare Kohler
author_sort Andrea Bowra
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Beginning in 1996, Purdue Pharmaceuticals (Purdue) knowingly mislabeled and mass marketed OxyContin (oxycodone), an opioid painkiller, catalyzing the opioid crisis which has been responsible for more than 600 000 deaths in and beyond North America. This case is an extreme example of how transnational pharmaceutical companies prioritize shareholder profits over public wellbeing. As such, the field of global health faces the critical challenge of better understanding how transnational pharmaceutical companies, like Purdue, can be held to account for the harms they cause. Within the framework of Actor-Network Theory, a sociomaterial approach to analyzing complex networks, this case study uses key informant interviews (n = 18) to examine how accountability is taken up in and by global health systems in response to the harms caused by Purdue. Findings highlight the multiple co-existing versions of accountability enacted within global health systems organized as three separate but interrelated networks: social accountability, political accountability, and legal accountability. Though often interconnected, these diverse networks mobilized distinct tools, resources, and strategies, such as news articles, scholarly literature, and policy guidelines, to construct and stabilize enactments of accountability. Through this in-depth examination of the complex interactions involved in global health and pharmaceutical systems, this study offers a nuanced understanding of the diverse actors mobilized and the unique strengths leveraged within and by accountability networks. Further, in examining these networks’ differences, interconnectedness, and peculiarities, we broaden the scope of how accountability is defined, conceptualized, and operationalized in global health systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-4e96631741a149a298b26804ede2f3ee
institution Kabale University
issn 1744-8603
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Globalization and Health
spelling doaj-art-4e96631741a149a298b26804ede2f3ee2025-08-20T03:42:09ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032025-08-0121111310.1186/s12992-025-01140-5Accountability in global health systems: insights from a network analysis of Purdue PharmaceuticalsAndrea Bowra0Amaya Perez-Brumer1Lisa Forman2Jillian Clare Kohler3Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of TorontoAbstract Beginning in 1996, Purdue Pharmaceuticals (Purdue) knowingly mislabeled and mass marketed OxyContin (oxycodone), an opioid painkiller, catalyzing the opioid crisis which has been responsible for more than 600 000 deaths in and beyond North America. This case is an extreme example of how transnational pharmaceutical companies prioritize shareholder profits over public wellbeing. As such, the field of global health faces the critical challenge of better understanding how transnational pharmaceutical companies, like Purdue, can be held to account for the harms they cause. Within the framework of Actor-Network Theory, a sociomaterial approach to analyzing complex networks, this case study uses key informant interviews (n = 18) to examine how accountability is taken up in and by global health systems in response to the harms caused by Purdue. Findings highlight the multiple co-existing versions of accountability enacted within global health systems organized as three separate but interrelated networks: social accountability, political accountability, and legal accountability. Though often interconnected, these diverse networks mobilized distinct tools, resources, and strategies, such as news articles, scholarly literature, and policy guidelines, to construct and stabilize enactments of accountability. Through this in-depth examination of the complex interactions involved in global health and pharmaceutical systems, this study offers a nuanced understanding of the diverse actors mobilized and the unique strengths leveraged within and by accountability networks. Further, in examining these networks’ differences, interconnectedness, and peculiarities, we broaden the scope of how accountability is defined, conceptualized, and operationalized in global health systems.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01140-5
spellingShingle Andrea Bowra
Amaya Perez-Brumer
Lisa Forman
Jillian Clare Kohler
Accountability in global health systems: insights from a network analysis of Purdue Pharmaceuticals
Globalization and Health
title Accountability in global health systems: insights from a network analysis of Purdue Pharmaceuticals
title_full Accountability in global health systems: insights from a network analysis of Purdue Pharmaceuticals
title_fullStr Accountability in global health systems: insights from a network analysis of Purdue Pharmaceuticals
title_full_unstemmed Accountability in global health systems: insights from a network analysis of Purdue Pharmaceuticals
title_short Accountability in global health systems: insights from a network analysis of Purdue Pharmaceuticals
title_sort accountability in global health systems insights from a network analysis of purdue pharmaceuticals
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01140-5
work_keys_str_mv AT andreabowra accountabilityinglobalhealthsystemsinsightsfromanetworkanalysisofpurduepharmaceuticals
AT amayaperezbrumer accountabilityinglobalhealthsystemsinsightsfromanetworkanalysisofpurduepharmaceuticals
AT lisaforman accountabilityinglobalhealthsystemsinsightsfromanetworkanalysisofpurduepharmaceuticals
AT jillianclarekohler accountabilityinglobalhealthsystemsinsightsfromanetworkanalysisofpurduepharmaceuticals