Unstable metaphors, uncertain minds: how metaphors shape judgments and opinions

IntroductionPrevious research has shown that experimentally manipulated physical states of instability negatively affect judgments and opinions. Based on this result, in the current study we want to investigate whether the processing of metaphorical expressions related to physical instability (e.g.,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martina Montalti, Stefana Garello, Valentina Cuccio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1536950/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849766516935884800
author Martina Montalti
Martina Montalti
Stefana Garello
Valentina Cuccio
author_facet Martina Montalti
Martina Montalti
Stefana Garello
Valentina Cuccio
author_sort Martina Montalti
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionPrevious research has shown that experimentally manipulated physical states of instability negatively affect judgments and opinions. Based on this result, in the current study we want to investigate whether the processing of metaphorical expressions related to physical instability (e.g., “Our economy is shaky”) and underpinned by the conceptual metaphor EMOTIONAL STABILITY IS BALANCE negatively affects participants’ judgments.MethodsThree hundred participants were assigned to three experimental groups. Each group was presented with sentences containing, respectively, stable metaphors, unstable metaphors or unstable literal sentences. After reading the sentences, participants were asked to respond to six topical questions regarding current and future economic and life perspectives.ResultsData shows that across all six topical questions, reading stable metaphors led to more positive judgments compared to unstable sentences (both metaphors and literal ones). Moreover, in four questions out of six, reading unstable metaphorical sentences led to lower ratings compared to unstable literal sentences.DiscussionThese findings support the main claim of Conceptual Metaphor Theory, i.e., the idea that abstract and complex concepts are structured via metaphorical mappings from more concrete and simple ones and align with the Embodied Cognition Hypothesis. Furthermore, these findings suggest that metaphors can have a powerful influence on our perception of the world and contribute to our understanding of how metaphorical language can shape bodily experiences and attitudes.
format Article
id doaj-art-4e8268d6a05749fb8409b71e83fd854b
institution DOAJ
issn 1664-1078
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj-art-4e8268d6a05749fb8409b71e83fd854b2025-08-20T03:04:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782025-04-011610.3389/fpsyg.2025.15369501536950Unstable metaphors, uncertain minds: how metaphors shape judgments and opinionsMartina Montalti0Martina Montalti1Stefana Garello2Valentina Cuccio3Department of Ancient and Modern Civilizations, University of Messina, Messina, ItalyUnit of Neuroscience, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, ItalyDepartment of Philosophy, Communication and Arts, University of Roma Tre, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Ancient and Modern Civilizations, University of Messina, Messina, ItalyIntroductionPrevious research has shown that experimentally manipulated physical states of instability negatively affect judgments and opinions. Based on this result, in the current study we want to investigate whether the processing of metaphorical expressions related to physical instability (e.g., “Our economy is shaky”) and underpinned by the conceptual metaphor EMOTIONAL STABILITY IS BALANCE negatively affects participants’ judgments.MethodsThree hundred participants were assigned to three experimental groups. Each group was presented with sentences containing, respectively, stable metaphors, unstable metaphors or unstable literal sentences. After reading the sentences, participants were asked to respond to six topical questions regarding current and future economic and life perspectives.ResultsData shows that across all six topical questions, reading stable metaphors led to more positive judgments compared to unstable sentences (both metaphors and literal ones). Moreover, in four questions out of six, reading unstable metaphorical sentences led to lower ratings compared to unstable literal sentences.DiscussionThese findings support the main claim of Conceptual Metaphor Theory, i.e., the idea that abstract and complex concepts are structured via metaphorical mappings from more concrete and simple ones and align with the Embodied Cognition Hypothesis. Furthermore, these findings suggest that metaphors can have a powerful influence on our perception of the world and contribute to our understanding of how metaphorical language can shape bodily experiences and attitudes.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1536950/fullconceptual metaphorsphysical instabilityembodied cognitionembodied persuasionmetaphor processingembodied language
spellingShingle Martina Montalti
Martina Montalti
Stefana Garello
Valentina Cuccio
Unstable metaphors, uncertain minds: how metaphors shape judgments and opinions
Frontiers in Psychology
conceptual metaphors
physical instability
embodied cognition
embodied persuasion
metaphor processing
embodied language
title Unstable metaphors, uncertain minds: how metaphors shape judgments and opinions
title_full Unstable metaphors, uncertain minds: how metaphors shape judgments and opinions
title_fullStr Unstable metaphors, uncertain minds: how metaphors shape judgments and opinions
title_full_unstemmed Unstable metaphors, uncertain minds: how metaphors shape judgments and opinions
title_short Unstable metaphors, uncertain minds: how metaphors shape judgments and opinions
title_sort unstable metaphors uncertain minds how metaphors shape judgments and opinions
topic conceptual metaphors
physical instability
embodied cognition
embodied persuasion
metaphor processing
embodied language
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1536950/full
work_keys_str_mv AT martinamontalti unstablemetaphorsuncertainmindshowmetaphorsshapejudgmentsandopinions
AT martinamontalti unstablemetaphorsuncertainmindshowmetaphorsshapejudgmentsandopinions
AT stefanagarello unstablemetaphorsuncertainmindshowmetaphorsshapejudgmentsandopinions
AT valentinacuccio unstablemetaphorsuncertainmindshowmetaphorsshapejudgmentsandopinions