Pain without gain? A randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensity

Background Foam rolling has become increasingly popular for its proposed benefits on physical performance and recovery. This study investigated the effects of single bouts of active foam rolling and passive foam rolling on vertical jump height, perceived pain, and applied pressure during treatment....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lars Heinke, Sasha Javanmardi, Janis Alexander Zemke, Ludwig Rappelt, Jürgen Freiwald, Christian Baumgart, Daniel Niederer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2025-07-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/19747.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849247439604678656
author Lars Heinke
Sasha Javanmardi
Janis Alexander Zemke
Ludwig Rappelt
Jürgen Freiwald
Christian Baumgart
Daniel Niederer
author_facet Lars Heinke
Sasha Javanmardi
Janis Alexander Zemke
Ludwig Rappelt
Jürgen Freiwald
Christian Baumgart
Daniel Niederer
author_sort Lars Heinke
collection DOAJ
description Background Foam rolling has become increasingly popular for its proposed benefits on physical performance and recovery. This study investigated the effects of single bouts of active foam rolling and passive foam rolling on vertical jump height, perceived pain, and applied pressure during treatment. Methods Twenty physically active participants (10 males, 10 females) completed a randomized crossover design study, undergoing one active and one passive foam rolling session. Jumping performance was assessed via countermovement jump (CMJ) height at baseline, pre-treatment (PRE), and post-treatment (POST). Pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analog scale, while applied pressure was measured via force plates for active foam rolling and the weight applied to a custom device for passive foam rolling. Results The CMJ height post-treatment was reduced after both foam rolling treatments (p < 0.001, ωp2 = 0.29), with no significant interaction or condition effect observed. The applied pressure during active was significantly higher than during passive foam rolling for the thigh (p < 0.001, Hedges’ g = 1.14). In contrast, perceived pain was greater in passive than in active rolling (p = 0.002, Hedges’ g = 0.96). CMJ height improved following the initial warm-up (baseline to PRE, p = 0.014, 95%, Hedges’ g = −0.11). Conclusion This study highlights the biomechanical and psychological complexities of foam rolling, suggesting that both active and passive rolling may temporarily impair power performance. The observed jump height reduction could stem from decreased tissue stiffness, while the initial warm-up benefits reinforce the effectiveness of traditional warm-up protocols.
format Article
id doaj-art-4e7c3daeee92480994bcdb81ee96eb40
institution Kabale University
issn 2167-8359
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj-art-4e7c3daeee92480994bcdb81ee96eb402025-08-20T03:58:14ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592025-07-0113e1974710.7717/peerj.19747Pain without gain? A randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensityLars Heinke0Sasha Javanmardi1Janis Alexander Zemke2Ludwig Rappelt3Jürgen Freiwald4Christian Baumgart5Daniel Niederer6Department of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, GermanyInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyBackground Foam rolling has become increasingly popular for its proposed benefits on physical performance and recovery. This study investigated the effects of single bouts of active foam rolling and passive foam rolling on vertical jump height, perceived pain, and applied pressure during treatment. Methods Twenty physically active participants (10 males, 10 females) completed a randomized crossover design study, undergoing one active and one passive foam rolling session. Jumping performance was assessed via countermovement jump (CMJ) height at baseline, pre-treatment (PRE), and post-treatment (POST). Pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analog scale, while applied pressure was measured via force plates for active foam rolling and the weight applied to a custom device for passive foam rolling. Results The CMJ height post-treatment was reduced after both foam rolling treatments (p < 0.001, ωp2 = 0.29), with no significant interaction or condition effect observed. The applied pressure during active was significantly higher than during passive foam rolling for the thigh (p < 0.001, Hedges’ g = 1.14). In contrast, perceived pain was greater in passive than in active rolling (p = 0.002, Hedges’ g = 0.96). CMJ height improved following the initial warm-up (baseline to PRE, p = 0.014, 95%, Hedges’ g = −0.11). Conclusion This study highlights the biomechanical and psychological complexities of foam rolling, suggesting that both active and passive rolling may temporarily impair power performance. The observed jump height reduction could stem from decreased tissue stiffness, while the initial warm-up benefits reinforce the effectiveness of traditional warm-up protocols.https://peerj.com/articles/19747.pdfFoam rollingMyofascial releasePain perceptionCountermovement jumpWarm-upMuscle
spellingShingle Lars Heinke
Sasha Javanmardi
Janis Alexander Zemke
Ludwig Rappelt
Jürgen Freiwald
Christian Baumgart
Daniel Niederer
Pain without gain? A randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensity
PeerJ
Foam rolling
Myofascial release
Pain perception
Countermovement jump
Warm-up
Muscle
title Pain without gain? A randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensity
title_full Pain without gain? A randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensity
title_fullStr Pain without gain? A randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensity
title_full_unstemmed Pain without gain? A randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensity
title_short Pain without gain? A randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensity
title_sort pain without gain a randomized crossover study on the impact of active and passive foam rolling on jump height and pain intensity
topic Foam rolling
Myofascial release
Pain perception
Countermovement jump
Warm-up
Muscle
url https://peerj.com/articles/19747.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT larsheinke painwithoutgainarandomizedcrossoverstudyontheimpactofactiveandpassivefoamrollingonjumpheightandpainintensity
AT sashajavanmardi painwithoutgainarandomizedcrossoverstudyontheimpactofactiveandpassivefoamrollingonjumpheightandpainintensity
AT janisalexanderzemke painwithoutgainarandomizedcrossoverstudyontheimpactofactiveandpassivefoamrollingonjumpheightandpainintensity
AT ludwigrappelt painwithoutgainarandomizedcrossoverstudyontheimpactofactiveandpassivefoamrollingonjumpheightandpainintensity
AT jurgenfreiwald painwithoutgainarandomizedcrossoverstudyontheimpactofactiveandpassivefoamrollingonjumpheightandpainintensity
AT christianbaumgart painwithoutgainarandomizedcrossoverstudyontheimpactofactiveandpassivefoamrollingonjumpheightandpainintensity
AT danielniederer painwithoutgainarandomizedcrossoverstudyontheimpactofactiveandpassivefoamrollingonjumpheightandpainintensity