SELECTION OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Sustainable rural development consists of three components: economic, ecological, and social. The paper paid to the economic component through selection of the most relevant economic indicators for measuring sustainable rural development at NUTS 3 level. Objectives of the research were: a) to identi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Papers Series : Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development |
| Online Access: | https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.20_3/Art33.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850221479379075072 |
|---|---|
| author | Mateja JEŽ ROGELJ Ornella MIKUŠ Lari HADELAN |
| author_facet | Mateja JEŽ ROGELJ Ornella MIKUŠ Lari HADELAN |
| author_sort | Mateja JEŽ ROGELJ |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Sustainable rural development consists of three components: economic, ecological, and social. The paper paid to the economic component through selection of the most relevant economic indicators for measuring sustainable rural development at NUTS 3 level. Objectives of the research were: a) to identify the most appropriate economic indicators for measuring sustainable rural development, either used so far or proposed in the literature, b) to select five most relevant indicators according to the experts’ estimate. The analysis of previous research has outlined and explained 15 economic indicators. After the first phase of selection, an additional selection of indicators by expert evaluation was carried out. Based on the expert evaluation, five most relevant economic indicators were identified, namely according to the average grade: unemployment rate (4.49), accessibility of agricultural infrastructure (4.47), gross domestic product per capita (4.45), education level as a prerequisite for the use of innovation (4.26) and productivity of agricultural production (4.21). Looking at separate assessments of each of the expert groups, it is evident that their selection of the five most relevant indicators only coincides in two of them: unemployment rate and availability of agricultural infrastructure. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4e3b7c2b0f314320ba29ec927f34a82c |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2284-7995 2285-3952 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Papers Series : Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development |
| spelling | doaj-art-4e3b7c2b0f314320ba29ec927f34a82c2025-08-20T02:06:43ZengUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, BucharestScientific Papers Series : Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development2284-79952285-39522020-01-012032852961650SELECTION OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENTMateja JEŽ ROGELJOrnella MIKUŠLari HADELANSustainable rural development consists of three components: economic, ecological, and social. The paper paid to the economic component through selection of the most relevant economic indicators for measuring sustainable rural development at NUTS 3 level. Objectives of the research were: a) to identify the most appropriate economic indicators for measuring sustainable rural development, either used so far or proposed in the literature, b) to select five most relevant indicators according to the experts’ estimate. The analysis of previous research has outlined and explained 15 economic indicators. After the first phase of selection, an additional selection of indicators by expert evaluation was carried out. Based on the expert evaluation, five most relevant economic indicators were identified, namely according to the average grade: unemployment rate (4.49), accessibility of agricultural infrastructure (4.47), gross domestic product per capita (4.45), education level as a prerequisite for the use of innovation (4.26) and productivity of agricultural production (4.21). Looking at separate assessments of each of the expert groups, it is evident that their selection of the five most relevant indicators only coincides in two of them: unemployment rate and availability of agricultural infrastructure.https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.20_3/Art33.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Mateja JEŽ ROGELJ Ornella MIKUŠ Lari HADELAN SELECTION OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT Scientific Papers Series : Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development |
| title | SELECTION OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT |
| title_full | SELECTION OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT |
| title_fullStr | SELECTION OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT |
| title_full_unstemmed | SELECTION OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT |
| title_short | SELECTION OF ECONOMIC INDICATORS FOR MEASURING SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT |
| title_sort | selection of economic indicators for measuring sustainable rural development |
| url | https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.20_3/Art33.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT matejajezrogelj selectionofeconomicindicatorsformeasuringsustainableruraldevelopment AT ornellamikus selectionofeconomicindicatorsformeasuringsustainableruraldevelopment AT larihadelan selectionofeconomicindicatorsformeasuringsustainableruraldevelopment |