Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma

Abstract Background Cholesteatoma is a destructive, erosive growth of keratinizing squamous epithelium in the middle ear cleft. Following treatment with a canal wall-up (CWU) tympanomastoidectomy, surveillance of residual and recurrent disease has traditionally been achieved through a second look ty...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David L. Choi, Michael K. Gupta, Ryan Rebello, Jason D. Archibald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-11-01
Series:Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-019-0384-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544122223722496
author David L. Choi
Michael K. Gupta
Ryan Rebello
Jason D. Archibald
author_facet David L. Choi
Michael K. Gupta
Ryan Rebello
Jason D. Archibald
author_sort David L. Choi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cholesteatoma is a destructive, erosive growth of keratinizing squamous epithelium in the middle ear cleft. Following treatment with a canal wall-up (CWU) tympanomastoidectomy, surveillance of residual and recurrent disease has traditionally been achieved through a second look tympanotomy following the initial procedure. Historically, MRI sequences have been inadequate at differentiating between granulation tissue, inflammation, and cholesteatoma. Recent literature has shown diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) to be a viable alternative to second look surgery for the detection of residual or recurrent disease. The goal of the present study was to perform a cost analysis of DWIMRI versus second look surgery in the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma following combined approach tympanomastoidectomy. Methods A probabilistic decision tree model was generated from a literature review to compare traditional second look surgery with DWMRI. Cost inputs were obtained from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) schedule of benefits. Costs were reported in Canadian dollars and a payer perspective was adopted. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results According to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, mean cost difference of traditional second look tympanotomy versus echo planar imaging (EPI) DWMRI was $180.27CAD, 95%CI [$177.32, $188,32] in favour of second-look tympanotomy. However, mean cost difference of traditional second look tympanotomy versus non-EPI DWMRI was $390.66CAD, 95%CI [$381.52, $399.80] in favour of non-EPI DWMRI. Conclusions Diffusion-weighted MRI, specifically non-EPI sequences, are a viable cost-saving alternative to second-look tympanotomy in the setting of detecting residual or recurrent cholesteatoma.
format Article
id doaj-art-4e32315fc3bf42f7909658f0e159113c
institution Kabale University
issn 1916-0216
language English
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
spelling doaj-art-4e32315fc3bf42f7909658f0e159113c2025-02-03T10:54:12ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1916-02162019-11-014811710.1186/s40463-019-0384-1Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatomaDavid L. Choi0Michael K. Gupta1Ryan Rebello2Jason D. Archibald3Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster UniversityDivision of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Radiology, McMaster UniversityDivision of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster UniversityAbstract Background Cholesteatoma is a destructive, erosive growth of keratinizing squamous epithelium in the middle ear cleft. Following treatment with a canal wall-up (CWU) tympanomastoidectomy, surveillance of residual and recurrent disease has traditionally been achieved through a second look tympanotomy following the initial procedure. Historically, MRI sequences have been inadequate at differentiating between granulation tissue, inflammation, and cholesteatoma. Recent literature has shown diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) to be a viable alternative to second look surgery for the detection of residual or recurrent disease. The goal of the present study was to perform a cost analysis of DWIMRI versus second look surgery in the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma following combined approach tympanomastoidectomy. Methods A probabilistic decision tree model was generated from a literature review to compare traditional second look surgery with DWMRI. Cost inputs were obtained from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) schedule of benefits. Costs were reported in Canadian dollars and a payer perspective was adopted. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results According to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, mean cost difference of traditional second look tympanotomy versus echo planar imaging (EPI) DWMRI was $180.27CAD, 95%CI [$177.32, $188,32] in favour of second-look tympanotomy. However, mean cost difference of traditional second look tympanotomy versus non-EPI DWMRI was $390.66CAD, 95%CI [$381.52, $399.80] in favour of non-EPI DWMRI. Conclusions Diffusion-weighted MRI, specifically non-EPI sequences, are a viable cost-saving alternative to second-look tympanotomy in the setting of detecting residual or recurrent cholesteatoma.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-019-0384-1CholesteatomaRecurrenceDiffusion-weighted MRISecond-look surgery
spellingShingle David L. Choi
Michael K. Gupta
Ryan Rebello
Jason D. Archibald
Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Cholesteatoma
Recurrence
Diffusion-weighted MRI
Second-look surgery
title Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma
title_full Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma
title_fullStr Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma
title_full_unstemmed Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma
title_short Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma
title_sort cost comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging dwmri versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma
topic Cholesteatoma
Recurrence
Diffusion-weighted MRI
Second-look surgery
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-019-0384-1
work_keys_str_mv AT davidlchoi costcomparisonanalysisofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdwmriversussecondlooksurgeryforthedetectionofresidualandrecurrentcholesteatoma
AT michaelkgupta costcomparisonanalysisofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdwmriversussecondlooksurgeryforthedetectionofresidualandrecurrentcholesteatoma
AT ryanrebello costcomparisonanalysisofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdwmriversussecondlooksurgeryforthedetectionofresidualandrecurrentcholesteatoma
AT jasondarchibald costcomparisonanalysisofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdwmriversussecondlooksurgeryforthedetectionofresidualandrecurrentcholesteatoma