Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma
Abstract Background Cholesteatoma is a destructive, erosive growth of keratinizing squamous epithelium in the middle ear cleft. Following treatment with a canal wall-up (CWU) tympanomastoidectomy, surveillance of residual and recurrent disease has traditionally been achieved through a second look ty...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-019-0384-1 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832544122223722496 |
---|---|
author | David L. Choi Michael K. Gupta Ryan Rebello Jason D. Archibald |
author_facet | David L. Choi Michael K. Gupta Ryan Rebello Jason D. Archibald |
author_sort | David L. Choi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Cholesteatoma is a destructive, erosive growth of keratinizing squamous epithelium in the middle ear cleft. Following treatment with a canal wall-up (CWU) tympanomastoidectomy, surveillance of residual and recurrent disease has traditionally been achieved through a second look tympanotomy following the initial procedure. Historically, MRI sequences have been inadequate at differentiating between granulation tissue, inflammation, and cholesteatoma. Recent literature has shown diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) to be a viable alternative to second look surgery for the detection of residual or recurrent disease. The goal of the present study was to perform a cost analysis of DWIMRI versus second look surgery in the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma following combined approach tympanomastoidectomy. Methods A probabilistic decision tree model was generated from a literature review to compare traditional second look surgery with DWMRI. Cost inputs were obtained from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) schedule of benefits. Costs were reported in Canadian dollars and a payer perspective was adopted. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results According to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, mean cost difference of traditional second look tympanotomy versus echo planar imaging (EPI) DWMRI was $180.27CAD, 95%CI [$177.32, $188,32] in favour of second-look tympanotomy. However, mean cost difference of traditional second look tympanotomy versus non-EPI DWMRI was $390.66CAD, 95%CI [$381.52, $399.80] in favour of non-EPI DWMRI. Conclusions Diffusion-weighted MRI, specifically non-EPI sequences, are a viable cost-saving alternative to second-look tympanotomy in the setting of detecting residual or recurrent cholesteatoma. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-4e32315fc3bf42f7909658f0e159113c |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1916-0216 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019-11-01 |
publisher | SAGE Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery |
spelling | doaj-art-4e32315fc3bf42f7909658f0e159113c2025-02-03T10:54:12ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1916-02162019-11-014811710.1186/s40463-019-0384-1Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatomaDavid L. Choi0Michael K. Gupta1Ryan Rebello2Jason D. Archibald3Division of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster UniversityDivision of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster UniversityDepartment of Radiology, McMaster UniversityDivision of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster UniversityAbstract Background Cholesteatoma is a destructive, erosive growth of keratinizing squamous epithelium in the middle ear cleft. Following treatment with a canal wall-up (CWU) tympanomastoidectomy, surveillance of residual and recurrent disease has traditionally been achieved through a second look tympanotomy following the initial procedure. Historically, MRI sequences have been inadequate at differentiating between granulation tissue, inflammation, and cholesteatoma. Recent literature has shown diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) to be a viable alternative to second look surgery for the detection of residual or recurrent disease. The goal of the present study was to perform a cost analysis of DWIMRI versus second look surgery in the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma following combined approach tympanomastoidectomy. Methods A probabilistic decision tree model was generated from a literature review to compare traditional second look surgery with DWMRI. Cost inputs were obtained from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) schedule of benefits. Costs were reported in Canadian dollars and a payer perspective was adopted. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results According to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, mean cost difference of traditional second look tympanotomy versus echo planar imaging (EPI) DWMRI was $180.27CAD, 95%CI [$177.32, $188,32] in favour of second-look tympanotomy. However, mean cost difference of traditional second look tympanotomy versus non-EPI DWMRI was $390.66CAD, 95%CI [$381.52, $399.80] in favour of non-EPI DWMRI. Conclusions Diffusion-weighted MRI, specifically non-EPI sequences, are a viable cost-saving alternative to second-look tympanotomy in the setting of detecting residual or recurrent cholesteatoma.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-019-0384-1CholesteatomaRecurrenceDiffusion-weighted MRISecond-look surgery |
spellingShingle | David L. Choi Michael K. Gupta Ryan Rebello Jason D. Archibald Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Cholesteatoma Recurrence Diffusion-weighted MRI Second-look surgery |
title | Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma |
title_full | Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma |
title_fullStr | Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma |
title_short | Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma |
title_sort | cost comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging dwmri versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma |
topic | Cholesteatoma Recurrence Diffusion-weighted MRI Second-look surgery |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-019-0384-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidlchoi costcomparisonanalysisofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdwmriversussecondlooksurgeryforthedetectionofresidualandrecurrentcholesteatoma AT michaelkgupta costcomparisonanalysisofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdwmriversussecondlooksurgeryforthedetectionofresidualandrecurrentcholesteatoma AT ryanrebello costcomparisonanalysisofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdwmriversussecondlooksurgeryforthedetectionofresidualandrecurrentcholesteatoma AT jasondarchibald costcomparisonanalysisofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdwmriversussecondlooksurgeryforthedetectionofresidualandrecurrentcholesteatoma |