Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial
Objective: This review is to compare patient-satisfaction with ball-type overdenture attachment systems with others attachment systems. Material and methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018097234) and adheres the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochr...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Saudi Dental Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905221000298 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850106725794840576 |
|---|---|
| author | Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro Rosa Rafaella de Souza Leão Cátia Maria Fonseca Guerra Eduardo Piza Pellizzer Bruno Gustavo da Silva Casado Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes |
| author_facet | Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro Rosa Rafaella de Souza Leão Cátia Maria Fonseca Guerra Eduardo Piza Pellizzer Bruno Gustavo da Silva Casado Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes |
| author_sort | Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro Rosa |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: This review is to compare patient-satisfaction with ball-type overdenture attachment systems with others attachment systems. Material and methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018097234) and adheres the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for published articles were performed before October 2020. The PICO question was: “Do patients with a ball-type overdenture retention system have greater satisfaction, when compared to other attachment systems?” The evaluation of risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: After searching the databases, seven articles were selected out of a total of 2583. A total of 312 implants were placed in 139 patients, with a mean age of 65.9 years. The risk of bias in the included studies varied according to the different domains in a risk of uncertain bias or low bias risk. No difference was found between the ball attachment systems and the others systems, with respect to patient-satisfaction. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between the ball systems and another systems (P = 0.11; MD: 10.90; 95% CI: −2.55 to 24.35). Conclusions: Regarding patient general satisfaction, it was not possible to determine differences between the ball system and another types of attachment system for overdenture. The ball-type system was statistically superior only to the magnet system. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4e16b0b77cb8487091382aed5bd15ee6 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1013-9052 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Saudi Dental Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-4e16b0b77cb8487091382aed5bd15ee62025-08-20T02:38:46ZengSpringerSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522021-09-0133629930710.1016/j.sdentj.2021.03.002Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trialCleber Davi Del Rei Daltro Rosa0Rafaella de Souza Leão1Cátia Maria Fonseca Guerra2Eduardo Piza Pellizzer3Bruno Gustavo da Silva Casado4Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes5Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, UNESP – São Paulo State University, R: José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil; Corresponding author at: Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, Sao Paulo State University – UNESP, Jose Bonifacio St, 1153 – Vila Mendonca, Aracatuba, Sao Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.Dentistry School, UPE – University of Pernambuco, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, BrazilDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, UNESP – São Paulo State University, R: José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, SP, BrazilDentistry School, UPE – University of Pernambuco, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, BrazilDentistry School, UPE – University of Pernambuco, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, BrazilObjective: This review is to compare patient-satisfaction with ball-type overdenture attachment systems with others attachment systems. Material and methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018097234) and adheres the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for published articles were performed before October 2020. The PICO question was: “Do patients with a ball-type overdenture retention system have greater satisfaction, when compared to other attachment systems?” The evaluation of risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: After searching the databases, seven articles were selected out of a total of 2583. A total of 312 implants were placed in 139 patients, with a mean age of 65.9 years. The risk of bias in the included studies varied according to the different domains in a risk of uncertain bias or low bias risk. No difference was found between the ball attachment systems and the others systems, with respect to patient-satisfaction. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between the ball systems and another systems (P = 0.11; MD: 10.90; 95% CI: −2.55 to 24.35). Conclusions: Regarding patient general satisfaction, it was not possible to determine differences between the ball system and another types of attachment system for overdenture. The ball-type system was statistically superior only to the magnet system.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905221000298OverdentureDenture precision attachmentPatient-satisfactionSystematic reviewCross-over studiesProsthodontics |
| spellingShingle | Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro Rosa Rafaella de Souza Leão Cátia Maria Fonseca Guerra Eduardo Piza Pellizzer Bruno Gustavo da Silva Casado Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial Saudi Dental Journal Overdenture Denture precision attachment Patient-satisfaction Systematic review Cross-over studies Prosthodontics |
| title | Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial |
| title_full | Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial |
| title_fullStr | Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial |
| title_short | Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial |
| title_sort | do ball type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient satisfaction a systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial |
| topic | Overdenture Denture precision attachment Patient-satisfaction Systematic review Cross-over studies Prosthodontics |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905221000298 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cleberdavidelreidaltrorosa doballtypeattachmentsystemsforoverdentureresultinbetterpatientsatisfactionasystematicreviewofrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT rafaelladesouzaleao doballtypeattachmentsystemsforoverdentureresultinbetterpatientsatisfactionasystematicreviewofrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT catiamariafonsecaguerra doballtypeattachmentsystemsforoverdentureresultinbetterpatientsatisfactionasystematicreviewofrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT eduardopizapellizzer doballtypeattachmentsystemsforoverdentureresultinbetterpatientsatisfactionasystematicreviewofrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT brunogustavodasilvacasado doballtypeattachmentsystemsforoverdentureresultinbetterpatientsatisfactionasystematicreviewofrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial AT sandraluciadantasdemoraes doballtypeattachmentsystemsforoverdentureresultinbetterpatientsatisfactionasystematicreviewofrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial |