Patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process: retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databases
Background Diagnostic errors (DEs) are a significant global patient safety issue, often associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to overlooked, delayed, or incorrect diagnoses. Our aim was to study the occurrence of DEs and adverse events (AEs), patient-related harm to identify vulnerab...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open Quality |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e003198.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849393745994186752 |
|---|---|
| author | Kim Lyngby Mikkelsen Charlotte Frendved Siri Tribler Eva Benfeldt Rikke Mørch Jørgensen |
| author_facet | Kim Lyngby Mikkelsen Charlotte Frendved Siri Tribler Eva Benfeldt Rikke Mørch Jørgensen |
| author_sort | Kim Lyngby Mikkelsen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background Diagnostic errors (DEs) are a significant global patient safety issue, often associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to overlooked, delayed, or incorrect diagnoses. Our aim was to study the occurrence of DEs and adverse events (AEs), patient-related harm to identify vulnerable steps in the diagnostic process.Methods A retrospective analysis of data from two public, national databases—National Health Care Compensation Claims Database (2009–2018) and Danish Patient Safety Database with AEs (2015–2020). Vulnerable steps in the diagnostic process were identified using a scoring tool developed by The Controlled Risk Insurance Company.Results In the analysis of patient compensation claims, 14.5% of all settled cases (n=90 000) were classified as due to a DE, with a 59% compensation rate for DEs, twice the rate compared with other compensated cases (25%). DEs constituted 29% of all compensated cases. Death due to DEs was 8.3% (n=680 cases), 1.8 times higher compared with other cases and DEs resulted in higher degrees of disability.In the overall reported AEs, 0.3% of AEs were fatal and 1.7% AEs caused severe patient harm, per year. In a representative sample of AEs with a severe or fatal consequence (n=269), 33% were due to DEs.The initial clinical assessment was a cause or contributor to the DE in 80% of the compensation cases and in 83% of the severe or fatal AEs. The follow-up and coordination phase were a cause in 33% of compensation cases and 46% of severe or fatal AEs.Conclusions Errors and AEs in the diagnostic process are prevalent and a significant patient safety issue in Danish healthcare. This study identifies vulnerable steps in the diagnostic process, with patterns correlated to different degrees of severity, and highlights steps for future improvements efforts needed to mitigate the risk of DEs. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4de440704915465a868b6b02fdf5da08 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2399-6641 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open Quality |
| spelling | doaj-art-4de440704915465a868b6b02fdf5da082025-08-20T03:40:18ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412025-03-0114110.1136/bmjoq-2024-003198Patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process: retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databasesKim Lyngby Mikkelsen0Charlotte Frendved1Siri Tribler2Eva Benfeldt3Rikke Mørch Jørgensen4Danish Patient Compensation, Patienterstatningen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDanish Society for Patient Safety, Frederiksberg, DenmarkDanish Society for Patient Safety, Frederiksberg, DenmarkDanish Patient Safety Authority, Copenhagen, DenmarkDanish Patient Safety Authority, Copenhagen, DenmarkBackground Diagnostic errors (DEs) are a significant global patient safety issue, often associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to overlooked, delayed, or incorrect diagnoses. Our aim was to study the occurrence of DEs and adverse events (AEs), patient-related harm to identify vulnerable steps in the diagnostic process.Methods A retrospective analysis of data from two public, national databases—National Health Care Compensation Claims Database (2009–2018) and Danish Patient Safety Database with AEs (2015–2020). Vulnerable steps in the diagnostic process were identified using a scoring tool developed by The Controlled Risk Insurance Company.Results In the analysis of patient compensation claims, 14.5% of all settled cases (n=90 000) were classified as due to a DE, with a 59% compensation rate for DEs, twice the rate compared with other compensated cases (25%). DEs constituted 29% of all compensated cases. Death due to DEs was 8.3% (n=680 cases), 1.8 times higher compared with other cases and DEs resulted in higher degrees of disability.In the overall reported AEs, 0.3% of AEs were fatal and 1.7% AEs caused severe patient harm, per year. In a representative sample of AEs with a severe or fatal consequence (n=269), 33% were due to DEs.The initial clinical assessment was a cause or contributor to the DE in 80% of the compensation cases and in 83% of the severe or fatal AEs. The follow-up and coordination phase were a cause in 33% of compensation cases and 46% of severe or fatal AEs.Conclusions Errors and AEs in the diagnostic process are prevalent and a significant patient safety issue in Danish healthcare. This study identifies vulnerable steps in the diagnostic process, with patterns correlated to different degrees of severity, and highlights steps for future improvements efforts needed to mitigate the risk of DEs.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e003198.full |
| spellingShingle | Kim Lyngby Mikkelsen Charlotte Frendved Siri Tribler Eva Benfeldt Rikke Mørch Jørgensen Patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process: retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databases BMJ Open Quality |
| title | Patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process: retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databases |
| title_full | Patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process: retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databases |
| title_fullStr | Patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process: retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databases |
| title_full_unstemmed | Patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process: retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databases |
| title_short | Patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process: retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databases |
| title_sort | patterns of errors and weaknesses in the diagnostic process retrospective analysis of malpractice claims and adverse events from two national databases |
| url | https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e003198.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kimlyngbymikkelsen patternsoferrorsandweaknessesinthediagnosticprocessretrospectiveanalysisofmalpracticeclaimsandadverseeventsfromtwonationaldatabases AT charlottefrendved patternsoferrorsandweaknessesinthediagnosticprocessretrospectiveanalysisofmalpracticeclaimsandadverseeventsfromtwonationaldatabases AT siritribler patternsoferrorsandweaknessesinthediagnosticprocessretrospectiveanalysisofmalpracticeclaimsandadverseeventsfromtwonationaldatabases AT evabenfeldt patternsoferrorsandweaknessesinthediagnosticprocessretrospectiveanalysisofmalpracticeclaimsandadverseeventsfromtwonationaldatabases AT rikkemørchjørgensen patternsoferrorsandweaknessesinthediagnosticprocessretrospectiveanalysisofmalpracticeclaimsandadverseeventsfromtwonationaldatabases |