Comparative evaluation of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors: A double blinded randomized controlled trial

Objectives: The research aims to assess the regenerative potential of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in immature permanent maxillary central incisors with necrotic pulps, clinically and radiographically. Trial design: Double blinded parallel randomized control...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hazim Mohamed Rizk, Consultant, Mohamed Sherif Mohamed Salah Al-Deen, Professor, Asmaa Aly Emam, Lecturer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2020-07-01
Series:Saudi Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101390521930642X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850181325196099584
author Hazim Mohamed Rizk, Consultant
Mohamed Sherif Mohamed Salah Al-Deen, Professor
Asmaa Aly Emam, Lecturer
author_facet Hazim Mohamed Rizk, Consultant
Mohamed Sherif Mohamed Salah Al-Deen, Professor
Asmaa Aly Emam, Lecturer
author_sort Hazim Mohamed Rizk, Consultant
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The research aims to assess the regenerative potential of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in immature permanent maxillary central incisors with necrotic pulps, clinically and radiographically. Trial design: Double blinded parallel randomized controlled trial was implemented to identify the results. Subject & methods: The proposed study was conducted among 30 patients with maxillary necrotic permanent immature central incisors but only 26 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Group I was treated with PRP and Group II with PRF scaffolds. Follow up has been done every 3 months for one year. Primary outcomes were measured clinically: Pain, Mobility, Swelling, and Sinus/fistula. Radiographically: increase root length and width. Secondary outcomes were clinically: Discoloration and Sensibility test. Radiographically: increase in bone density measurements and decrease in apical diameter. Standardized radiographs were collected during the follow up period, and radiographic changes were measured by using Image J software. Statistical analysis was performed on 25 patients who had completed the study. Results: All 25 patients' teeth were survived during the 12-month follow-up period. PRP showed marginal increase in radiographic root length and width, periapical bone density and a decrease in apical diameter. No statistical significant differences were observed when it was compared with PRF. The teeth which were treated did not respond to sensibility test at the end of the study. PRF displayed statistical significant higher amount of crown discoloration when compared to PRP group. Conclusions: For necrotic immature teeth, revascularization using PRP is an appropriate alternative to PRF and showed excellent 12-months prognosis.
format Article
id doaj-art-4dbb3be677ff4a29bfbea1f91eeb0df4
institution OA Journals
issn 1013-9052
language English
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Saudi Dental Journal
spelling doaj-art-4dbb3be677ff4a29bfbea1f91eeb0df42025-08-20T02:17:56ZengSpringerSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522020-07-0132522423110.1016/j.sdentj.2019.09.002Comparative evaluation of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors: A double blinded randomized controlled trialHazim Mohamed Rizk, Consultant0Mohamed Sherif Mohamed Salah Al-Deen, Professor1Asmaa Aly Emam, Lecturer2Corresponding author.; Pediatric Dentistry, Preventive & Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, EgyptPediatric Dentistry, Preventive & Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, EgyptPediatric Dentistry, Preventive & Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, EgyptObjectives: The research aims to assess the regenerative potential of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in immature permanent maxillary central incisors with necrotic pulps, clinically and radiographically. Trial design: Double blinded parallel randomized controlled trial was implemented to identify the results. Subject & methods: The proposed study was conducted among 30 patients with maxillary necrotic permanent immature central incisors but only 26 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Group I was treated with PRP and Group II with PRF scaffolds. Follow up has been done every 3 months for one year. Primary outcomes were measured clinically: Pain, Mobility, Swelling, and Sinus/fistula. Radiographically: increase root length and width. Secondary outcomes were clinically: Discoloration and Sensibility test. Radiographically: increase in bone density measurements and decrease in apical diameter. Standardized radiographs were collected during the follow up period, and radiographic changes were measured by using Image J software. Statistical analysis was performed on 25 patients who had completed the study. Results: All 25 patients' teeth were survived during the 12-month follow-up period. PRP showed marginal increase in radiographic root length and width, periapical bone density and a decrease in apical diameter. No statistical significant differences were observed when it was compared with PRF. The teeth which were treated did not respond to sensibility test at the end of the study. PRF displayed statistical significant higher amount of crown discoloration when compared to PRP group. Conclusions: For necrotic immature teeth, revascularization using PRP is an appropriate alternative to PRF and showed excellent 12-months prognosis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101390521930642XPlatelet rich plasmaPlatelet‑rich fibrinImmature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisorsRevascularization/revitalization
spellingShingle Hazim Mohamed Rizk, Consultant
Mohamed Sherif Mohamed Salah Al-Deen, Professor
Asmaa Aly Emam, Lecturer
Comparative evaluation of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors: A double blinded randomized controlled trial
Saudi Dental Journal
Platelet rich plasma
Platelet‑rich fibrin
Immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors
Revascularization/revitalization
title Comparative evaluation of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors: A double blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative evaluation of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors: A double blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors: A double blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors: A double blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparative evaluation of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors: A double blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparative evaluation of platelet rich plasma prp versus platelet rich fibrin prf scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors a double blinded randomized controlled trial
topic Platelet rich plasma
Platelet‑rich fibrin
Immature necrotic permanent maxillary central incisors
Revascularization/revitalization
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101390521930642X
work_keys_str_mv AT hazimmohamedrizkconsultant comparativeevaluationofplateletrichplasmaprpversusplateletrichfibrinprfscaffoldsinregenerativeendodontictreatmentofimmaturenecroticpermanentmaxillarycentralincisorsadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohamedsherifmohamedsalahaldeenprofessor comparativeevaluationofplateletrichplasmaprpversusplateletrichfibrinprfscaffoldsinregenerativeendodontictreatmentofimmaturenecroticpermanentmaxillarycentralincisorsadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT asmaaalyemamlecturer comparativeevaluationofplateletrichplasmaprpversusplateletrichfibrinprfscaffoldsinregenerativeendodontictreatmentofimmaturenecroticpermanentmaxillarycentralincisorsadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial