Multi‐subband fusion algorithm based on autoencoder

Abstract A novel algorithm for multi‐subband signal fusion achieves performance superior to traditional all‐pole model, matrix pencil algorithm and deep‐neural‐network (Deep neural network (DNN)). The method uses a deep‐learning autoencoder more fully described as a multi‐subband fusion autoencoder...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yilin Jiang, Liting Zhang, Li Li, Jinxin Li, Yaozu Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-12-01
Series:IET Signal Processing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/sil2.12153
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559552501907456
author Yilin Jiang
Liting Zhang
Li Li
Jinxin Li
Yaozu Yang
author_facet Yilin Jiang
Liting Zhang
Li Li
Jinxin Li
Yaozu Yang
author_sort Yilin Jiang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A novel algorithm for multi‐subband signal fusion achieves performance superior to traditional all‐pole model, matrix pencil algorithm and deep‐neural‐network (Deep neural network (DNN)). The method uses a deep‐learning autoencoder more fully described as a multi‐subband fusion autoencoder (MSFAE). This autoencoder comprises two parts: a multi‐subband encoder and a full‐band decoder. Full‐band echo distance envelopes are used as training data for the full‐band autoencoder, to obtain the full‐band coding and the full‐band decoder. Then, the multi‐subband echo distance envelopes are used as training data, and the full‐band coding is used as labels, to train the multi‐subband encoder. Finally, the multi‐subband encoder and the full‐band decoder are combined to obtain the MSFAE. The multi‐subband distance envelopes are input to the MSFAE to obtain the full‐band distance envelopes, improving the radar distance resolution and obtaining high‐resolution range profiles. In contrast with the traditional all‐pole model and matrix pencil algorithm, the authors’ MSFAE directly processes the information in the frequency domain, avoiding the error of pole estimation in the echo domain. In contrast with DNN, the authors’ MSFAE needs only multi‐subband distance envelopes as input, avoiding noise subband redundancy. The experimental results show that the fusion accuracy of MSFAE is higher than the traditional all‐pole model, matrix pencil algorithm and DNN. The MSFAE has superior performance using the fusion method, even at low signal‐to‐noise ratio.
format Article
id doaj-art-4db528a159b6483da48a28bb9d74349c
institution Kabale University
issn 1751-9675
1751-9683
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series IET Signal Processing
spelling doaj-art-4db528a159b6483da48a28bb9d74349c2025-02-03T01:29:44ZengWileyIET Signal Processing1751-96751751-96832022-12-011691071108410.1049/sil2.12153Multi‐subband fusion algorithm based on autoencoderYilin Jiang0Liting Zhang1Li Li2Jinxin Li3Yaozu Yang4College of Information and Communication Engineering Harbin Engineering University Harbin ChinaCollege of Information and Communication Engineering Harbin Engineering University Harbin ChinaDepartment of Information System Dalian Naval Academy Dalian ChinaCollege of Information and Communication Engineering Harbin Engineering University Harbin ChinaCollege of Information and Communication Engineering Harbin Engineering University Harbin ChinaAbstract A novel algorithm for multi‐subband signal fusion achieves performance superior to traditional all‐pole model, matrix pencil algorithm and deep‐neural‐network (Deep neural network (DNN)). The method uses a deep‐learning autoencoder more fully described as a multi‐subband fusion autoencoder (MSFAE). This autoencoder comprises two parts: a multi‐subband encoder and a full‐band decoder. Full‐band echo distance envelopes are used as training data for the full‐band autoencoder, to obtain the full‐band coding and the full‐band decoder. Then, the multi‐subband echo distance envelopes are used as training data, and the full‐band coding is used as labels, to train the multi‐subband encoder. Finally, the multi‐subband encoder and the full‐band decoder are combined to obtain the MSFAE. The multi‐subband distance envelopes are input to the MSFAE to obtain the full‐band distance envelopes, improving the radar distance resolution and obtaining high‐resolution range profiles. In contrast with the traditional all‐pole model and matrix pencil algorithm, the authors’ MSFAE directly processes the information in the frequency domain, avoiding the error of pole estimation in the echo domain. In contrast with DNN, the authors’ MSFAE needs only multi‐subband distance envelopes as input, avoiding noise subband redundancy. The experimental results show that the fusion accuracy of MSFAE is higher than the traditional all‐pole model, matrix pencil algorithm and DNN. The MSFAE has superior performance using the fusion method, even at low signal‐to‐noise ratio.https://doi.org/10.1049/sil2.12153autoencoderdeep learningHRRPneural networksubband fusion
spellingShingle Yilin Jiang
Liting Zhang
Li Li
Jinxin Li
Yaozu Yang
Multi‐subband fusion algorithm based on autoencoder
IET Signal Processing
autoencoder
deep learning
HRRP
neural network
subband fusion
title Multi‐subband fusion algorithm based on autoencoder
title_full Multi‐subband fusion algorithm based on autoencoder
title_fullStr Multi‐subband fusion algorithm based on autoencoder
title_full_unstemmed Multi‐subband fusion algorithm based on autoencoder
title_short Multi‐subband fusion algorithm based on autoencoder
title_sort multi subband fusion algorithm based on autoencoder
topic autoencoder
deep learning
HRRP
neural network
subband fusion
url https://doi.org/10.1049/sil2.12153
work_keys_str_mv AT yilinjiang multisubbandfusionalgorithmbasedonautoencoder
AT litingzhang multisubbandfusionalgorithmbasedonautoencoder
AT lili multisubbandfusionalgorithmbasedonautoencoder
AT jinxinli multisubbandfusionalgorithmbasedonautoencoder
AT yaozuyang multisubbandfusionalgorithmbasedonautoencoder