S. Holm, J. Lewis. Abortion: pro et contra / trans. from Engl. A. V. Nekhaev
The article provides a critical review of some of the most common arguments actively used in the abortion debate. Based on the notion of moral personhood, the main groups of such arguments (no full moral status, full moral status, and gradualism) are identified and characterized. Separate conside...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
2024-05-01
|
| Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2024/%D0%A2.9,%20%E2%84%962%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/120-131%20%D0%A5%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BC%20C.,%20%D0%9B%D1%8C%D1%8E%D0%B8%D1%81%20%D0%94%D0%B6..pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The article provides a critical review of some of the most common arguments
actively used in the abortion debate. Based on the notion of moral personhood,
the main groups of such arguments (no full moral status, full moral status, and
gradualism) are identified and characterized. Separate consideration is given to the
right of pregnant women to abortion, the legal defense of the fetus’ right to life,
and the practice of using the medical concept of viability in law. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2542-0488 2541-7983 |