Comparison of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software in Crown Design: An In Vitro Study

Introduction and aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been adopted in the field of dental restoration. This study aimed to evaluate the time efficiency and morphological accuracy of crowns designed by two AI-powered software programs in comparison with conventional computer-aided design software....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziqiong Wu, Chengqi Zhang, Xinjian Ye, Yuwei Dai, Jing Zhao, Wuyuan Zhao, Yuanna Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:International Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653924001965
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592784193748992
author Ziqiong Wu
Chengqi Zhang
Xinjian Ye
Yuwei Dai
Jing Zhao
Wuyuan Zhao
Yuanna Zheng
author_facet Ziqiong Wu
Chengqi Zhang
Xinjian Ye
Yuwei Dai
Jing Zhao
Wuyuan Zhao
Yuanna Zheng
author_sort Ziqiong Wu
collection DOAJ
description Introduction and aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been adopted in the field of dental restoration. This study aimed to evaluate the time efficiency and morphological accuracy of crowns designed by two AI-powered software programs in comparison with conventional computer-aided design software. Methods: A total of 33 clinically adapted posterior crowns were involved in the standard group. AI Automate (AA) and AI Dentbird Crown (AD) used two AI-powered design software programs, while the computer-aided experienced and computer-aided novice employed the Exocad DentalCAD software. Time efficiency between the AI-powered groups and computer-aided groups was evaluated by assessing the elapsed time. Morphological accuracy was assessed by means of three-dimensional geometric calculations, with the root-mean-square error compared against the standard group. Statistical analysis was conducted via the Kruskal–Wallis test (α = 0.05). Results: The time efficiency of the AI-powered groups was significantly higher than that of the computer-aided groups (P < .01). Moreover, the working time for both AA and AD groups was only one-quarter of that for the computer-aided novice group. Four groups significantly differed in morphological accuracy for occlusal and distal surfaces (P < .05). The AD group performed lower accuracy than the other three groups on the occlusal surfaces (P < .001) and the computer-aided experienced group was superior to the AA group in terms of accuracy on the distal surfaces (P = .029). However, morphological accuracy showed no significant difference among the four groups for mesial surfaces and margin lines (P > .05). Conclusion: AI-powered software enhanced the efficiency of crown design but failed to excel at morphological accuracy compared with experienced technicians using computer-aided software. AI-powered software requires further research and extensive deep learning to improve the morphological accuracy and stability of the crown design.
format Article
id doaj-art-4d7567d2c7514cb98929ca69ddc31c24
institution Kabale University
issn 0020-6539
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Dental Journal
spelling doaj-art-4d7567d2c7514cb98929ca69ddc31c242025-01-21T04:12:43ZengElsevierInternational Dental Journal0020-65392025-02-01751127134Comparison of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software in Crown Design: An In Vitro StudyZiqiong Wu0Chengqi Zhang1Xinjian Ye2Yuwei Dai3Jing Zhao4Wuyuan Zhao5Yuanna Zheng6School/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, ChinaSchool/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, ChinaStomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Oral Diseases, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Centre of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaStomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Oral Diseases, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Centre of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSchool/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, ChinaHangzhou Erran Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, ChinaSchool/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China; Ningbo Dental Hospital/Ningbo Oral Health Research Institute, Ningbo, China; Corresponding author. School/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Mail Box 97, Binwen Road 548, Hangzhou 310053, China; Ningbo Dental Hospital/Ningbo Oral Health Research Institute, Ningbo, China.Introduction and aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been adopted in the field of dental restoration. This study aimed to evaluate the time efficiency and morphological accuracy of crowns designed by two AI-powered software programs in comparison with conventional computer-aided design software. Methods: A total of 33 clinically adapted posterior crowns were involved in the standard group. AI Automate (AA) and AI Dentbird Crown (AD) used two AI-powered design software programs, while the computer-aided experienced and computer-aided novice employed the Exocad DentalCAD software. Time efficiency between the AI-powered groups and computer-aided groups was evaluated by assessing the elapsed time. Morphological accuracy was assessed by means of three-dimensional geometric calculations, with the root-mean-square error compared against the standard group. Statistical analysis was conducted via the Kruskal–Wallis test (α = 0.05). Results: The time efficiency of the AI-powered groups was significantly higher than that of the computer-aided groups (P < .01). Moreover, the working time for both AA and AD groups was only one-quarter of that for the computer-aided novice group. Four groups significantly differed in morphological accuracy for occlusal and distal surfaces (P < .05). The AD group performed lower accuracy than the other three groups on the occlusal surfaces (P < .001) and the computer-aided experienced group was superior to the AA group in terms of accuracy on the distal surfaces (P = .029). However, morphological accuracy showed no significant difference among the four groups for mesial surfaces and margin lines (P > .05). Conclusion: AI-powered software enhanced the efficiency of crown design but failed to excel at morphological accuracy compared with experienced technicians using computer-aided software. AI-powered software requires further research and extensive deep learning to improve the morphological accuracy and stability of the crown design.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653924001965Time efficiencyMorphological accuracyCrownArtificial intelligence-poweredComputer-aided
spellingShingle Ziqiong Wu
Chengqi Zhang
Xinjian Ye
Yuwei Dai
Jing Zhao
Wuyuan Zhao
Yuanna Zheng
Comparison of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software in Crown Design: An In Vitro Study
International Dental Journal
Time efficiency
Morphological accuracy
Crown
Artificial intelligence-powered
Computer-aided
title Comparison of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software in Crown Design: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software in Crown Design: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software in Crown Design: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software in Crown Design: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software in Crown Design: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of artificial intelligence powered software in crown design an in vitro study
topic Time efficiency
Morphological accuracy
Crown
Artificial intelligence-powered
Computer-aided
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653924001965
work_keys_str_mv AT ziqiongwu comparisonoftheefficacyofartificialintelligencepoweredsoftwareincrowndesignaninvitrostudy
AT chengqizhang comparisonoftheefficacyofartificialintelligencepoweredsoftwareincrowndesignaninvitrostudy
AT xinjianye comparisonoftheefficacyofartificialintelligencepoweredsoftwareincrowndesignaninvitrostudy
AT yuweidai comparisonoftheefficacyofartificialintelligencepoweredsoftwareincrowndesignaninvitrostudy
AT jingzhao comparisonoftheefficacyofartificialintelligencepoweredsoftwareincrowndesignaninvitrostudy
AT wuyuanzhao comparisonoftheefficacyofartificialintelligencepoweredsoftwareincrowndesignaninvitrostudy
AT yuannazheng comparisonoftheefficacyofartificialintelligencepoweredsoftwareincrowndesignaninvitrostudy