The emergence of global administrative systems: the case of sport
The “global” dimension of sport is, in the first instance, regulatory, and it embraces the whole complex of norms produced and implemented by regulatory sporting regimes at the international and domestic levels. These rules include not only private norms set by the International Olympic Committee (...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Milano University Press
2015-03-01
|
| Series: | Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs-unimi-test.4science.cloud/index.php/glocalism/article/view/21264 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849761460851310592 |
|---|---|
| author | Lorenzo Casini |
| author_facet | Lorenzo Casini |
| author_sort | Lorenzo Casini |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The “global” dimension of sport is, in the first instance, regulatory, and it embraces the whole complex of norms produced and implemented by regulatory sporting regimes at the international and domestic levels. These rules include not only private norms set by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and by International Federations (IFs) but also “hybrid” public-private norms approved by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and international law (such as the UNESCO Convention Against Doping in Sport). Sports law, therefore, is highly heterogeneous, and, above all, it is not simply transnational, but actually “global”. This law represents an autonomous global legal system, which displays distinctive features such as the presence of some separation of powers (in particular quasi-judicial, with the strategic role played by the Court of Arbitration for Sport) and the development of relevant procedural principles (e.g. fairness and due process); and these principles operate both in rulemaking procedures (e.g. the adoption of the WADA Code) and in adjudicatory ones (e.g. for disciplinary measures). Finally, this global legal system is made up with several international regulatory regimes, both private – such as the Olympic movement – and hybrid public and private – such as the world anti-doping regime. The paper will deal in particular with this latter issue. The analysis will focus on the global administrative dimensions of sports regimes, together with their inter-institutional relationships and its legal implications for the public and private interaction.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4d6d4e215c19416a94c679126c8be98d |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2283-7949 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-03-01 |
| publisher | Milano University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation |
| spelling | doaj-art-4d6d4e215c19416a94c679126c8be98d2025-08-20T03:06:01ZengMilano University PressGlocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation2283-79492015-03-011The emergence of global administrative systems: the case of sportLorenzo Casini 0Sapienza University of Rome The “global” dimension of sport is, in the first instance, regulatory, and it embraces the whole complex of norms produced and implemented by regulatory sporting regimes at the international and domestic levels. These rules include not only private norms set by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and by International Federations (IFs) but also “hybrid” public-private norms approved by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and international law (such as the UNESCO Convention Against Doping in Sport). Sports law, therefore, is highly heterogeneous, and, above all, it is not simply transnational, but actually “global”. This law represents an autonomous global legal system, which displays distinctive features such as the presence of some separation of powers (in particular quasi-judicial, with the strategic role played by the Court of Arbitration for Sport) and the development of relevant procedural principles (e.g. fairness and due process); and these principles operate both in rulemaking procedures (e.g. the adoption of the WADA Code) and in adjudicatory ones (e.g. for disciplinary measures). Finally, this global legal system is made up with several international regulatory regimes, both private – such as the Olympic movement – and hybrid public and private – such as the world anti-doping regime. The paper will deal in particular with this latter issue. The analysis will focus on the global administrative dimensions of sports regimes, together with their inter-institutional relationships and its legal implications for the public and private interaction. https://ojs-unimi-test.4science.cloud/index.php/glocalism/article/view/21264global governancesports lawglobal regulatory regimesinternational organizationsinternational arbitration |
| spellingShingle | Lorenzo Casini The emergence of global administrative systems: the case of sport Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation global governance sports law global regulatory regimes international organizations international arbitration |
| title | The emergence of global administrative systems: the case of sport |
| title_full | The emergence of global administrative systems: the case of sport |
| title_fullStr | The emergence of global administrative systems: the case of sport |
| title_full_unstemmed | The emergence of global administrative systems: the case of sport |
| title_short | The emergence of global administrative systems: the case of sport |
| title_sort | emergence of global administrative systems the case of sport |
| topic | global governance sports law global regulatory regimes international organizations international arbitration |
| url | https://ojs-unimi-test.4science.cloud/index.php/glocalism/article/view/21264 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lorenzocasini theemergenceofglobaladministrativesystemsthecaseofsport AT lorenzocasini emergenceofglobaladministrativesystemsthecaseofsport |