Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Emissions of OC and EC: Laboratory Comparisons with Port Fuel Injection Engine

Abstract To better understand carbonaceous aerosol emissions from gasoline vehicles, a gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicle with and without a gasoline particle filter (GPF) installed and a port fuel injection (PFI) vehicle were tested on a chassis dynamometer using standard emission drive cycles...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Zhang, John Liggio, Tak W. Chan, Lin Huang, Jeffrey R. Brook
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2022-05-01
Series:Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220032
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825197601009434624
author Jie Zhang
John Liggio
Tak W. Chan
Lin Huang
Jeffrey R. Brook
author_facet Jie Zhang
John Liggio
Tak W. Chan
Lin Huang
Jeffrey R. Brook
author_sort Jie Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To better understand carbonaceous aerosol emissions from gasoline vehicles, a gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicle with and without a gasoline particle filter (GPF) installed and a port fuel injection (PFI) vehicle were tested on a chassis dynamometer using standard emission drive cycles. Carbonaceous particles emitted from the vehicles were collected on quartz filters and analyzed using three different thermal optical protocols to assess the sensitivity of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) emission estimates to the methods, showing OC obtained by the IMPROVE and EC by the NIOSH protocol was the lowest. Compared to the PFI vehicle, the GDI vehicle had higher EC and OC emissions under cold-start cycles by 1415% and 46%, respectively. However, the OC emission from the PFI vehicle was higher than GDI during an aggressive driving cycle by 146%. By considering OC collected on a quartz filter behind a Teflon filter, the emissions from PFI vehicle were found to be more volatile than the GDI vehicle. This is consistent with the OC forming characteristics for GDI and PFI engines, which are pyrolyzed particles from incomplete combustion and incomplete volatilization of fuel droplets, respectively. Generally, the particle phase OC emissions from gasoline engines are more volatile than other sources (e.g., biomass burning), supported by the very low level of pyrolyzed organic carbon (POC) and small differences among protocols in the current study. Once the GDI vehicle was equipped with a GPF, the removal efficiency of EC was > 98%, but OC emissions could increase as a result of regeneration, suggesting that the effect of a GPF on total carbon emitted to the atmosphere needs further evaluation, especially considering the formation of secondary organic aerosol.
format Article
id doaj-art-4d339018c81b465ea17492b7b9994d82
institution Kabale University
issn 1680-8584
2071-1409
language English
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Aerosol and Air Quality Research
spelling doaj-art-4d339018c81b465ea17492b7b9994d822025-02-09T12:17:14ZengSpringerAerosol and Air Quality Research1680-85842071-14092022-05-0122611110.4209/aaqr.220032Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Emissions of OC and EC: Laboratory Comparisons with Port Fuel Injection EngineJie Zhang0John Liggio1Tak W. Chan2Lin Huang3Jeffrey R. Brook4Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Synergistic Control of Pollution and Carbon Emissions in Key Industries, Jiangsu Environmental Engineering Technology Co., Ltd.Air Quality Research Section, Environment and Climate Change CanadaEmissions Research and Measurement Section, Air Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change CanadaClimate Chemistry Measurement and Research, Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change CanadaAir Quality Research Section, Environment and Climate Change CanadaAbstract To better understand carbonaceous aerosol emissions from gasoline vehicles, a gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicle with and without a gasoline particle filter (GPF) installed and a port fuel injection (PFI) vehicle were tested on a chassis dynamometer using standard emission drive cycles. Carbonaceous particles emitted from the vehicles were collected on quartz filters and analyzed using three different thermal optical protocols to assess the sensitivity of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) emission estimates to the methods, showing OC obtained by the IMPROVE and EC by the NIOSH protocol was the lowest. Compared to the PFI vehicle, the GDI vehicle had higher EC and OC emissions under cold-start cycles by 1415% and 46%, respectively. However, the OC emission from the PFI vehicle was higher than GDI during an aggressive driving cycle by 146%. By considering OC collected on a quartz filter behind a Teflon filter, the emissions from PFI vehicle were found to be more volatile than the GDI vehicle. This is consistent with the OC forming characteristics for GDI and PFI engines, which are pyrolyzed particles from incomplete combustion and incomplete volatilization of fuel droplets, respectively. Generally, the particle phase OC emissions from gasoline engines are more volatile than other sources (e.g., biomass burning), supported by the very low level of pyrolyzed organic carbon (POC) and small differences among protocols in the current study. Once the GDI vehicle was equipped with a GPF, the removal efficiency of EC was > 98%, but OC emissions could increase as a result of regeneration, suggesting that the effect of a GPF on total carbon emitted to the atmosphere needs further evaluation, especially considering the formation of secondary organic aerosol.https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220032Gasoline direct injectionPort fuel injectionOCECGasoline particle filter
spellingShingle Jie Zhang
John Liggio
Tak W. Chan
Lin Huang
Jeffrey R. Brook
Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Emissions of OC and EC: Laboratory Comparisons with Port Fuel Injection Engine
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Gasoline direct injection
Port fuel injection
OC
EC
Gasoline particle filter
title Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Emissions of OC and EC: Laboratory Comparisons with Port Fuel Injection Engine
title_full Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Emissions of OC and EC: Laboratory Comparisons with Port Fuel Injection Engine
title_fullStr Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Emissions of OC and EC: Laboratory Comparisons with Port Fuel Injection Engine
title_full_unstemmed Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Emissions of OC and EC: Laboratory Comparisons with Port Fuel Injection Engine
title_short Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Emissions of OC and EC: Laboratory Comparisons with Port Fuel Injection Engine
title_sort gasoline direct injection engine emissions of oc and ec laboratory comparisons with port fuel injection engine
topic Gasoline direct injection
Port fuel injection
OC
EC
Gasoline particle filter
url https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220032
work_keys_str_mv AT jiezhang gasolinedirectinjectionengineemissionsofocandeclaboratorycomparisonswithportfuelinjectionengine
AT johnliggio gasolinedirectinjectionengineemissionsofocandeclaboratorycomparisonswithportfuelinjectionengine
AT takwchan gasolinedirectinjectionengineemissionsofocandeclaboratorycomparisonswithportfuelinjectionengine
AT linhuang gasolinedirectinjectionengineemissionsofocandeclaboratorycomparisonswithportfuelinjectionengine
AT jeffreyrbrook gasolinedirectinjectionengineemissionsofocandeclaboratorycomparisonswithportfuelinjectionengine