Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Abstract Purpose To investigate the utility of qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation of DCE-MRI for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). Methods This retrospective study analyzed 307 lesions in 231 patients who underwent 3.0T MRI. Experienced radiologists assessed PI-RADS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsutomu Tamada, Mitsuru Takeuchi, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Atsushi Higaki, Kazunori Moriya, Akihiko Kanki, Yoshihiko Fukukura, Akira Yamamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024-12-01
Series:Discover Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01668-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850134074721566720
author Tsutomu Tamada
Mitsuru Takeuchi
Hiroyuki Watanabe
Atsushi Higaki
Kazunori Moriya
Akihiko Kanki
Yoshihiko Fukukura
Akira Yamamoto
author_facet Tsutomu Tamada
Mitsuru Takeuchi
Hiroyuki Watanabe
Atsushi Higaki
Kazunori Moriya
Akihiko Kanki
Yoshihiko Fukukura
Akira Yamamoto
author_sort Tsutomu Tamada
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To investigate the utility of qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation of DCE-MRI for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). Methods This retrospective study analyzed 307 lesions in 231 patients who underwent 3.0T MRI. Experienced radiologists assessed PI-RADS v 2.1 assessment category, qualitative contrast enhancement (QCE), contrast enhancement pattern (CEP: type 1, 2, 3), tumor contrast ratio, and tumor size of PC lesions in consensus. Mean and 0–10th-percentile ADC value of the lesion (ADCmean and ADC0−10) were calculated. Specimens obtained from MRI–ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy were used as the pathological reference standard. Results In assessment of tumor aggressiveness, PI-RADS assessment category, QCE, tumor size, and ratio of CEP 2 + 3 were significantly higher in PC with Gleason score (GS) ≥ 3 + 4 (n = 256) than in PC with GS = 6 (n = 51) (P ≤ 0.001). Tumor ADCmean and tumor ADC0−10 were comparable between PC with GS ≥ 3 + 4 and PC with GS = 6 (P = 0.164 to 0.504). Regarding diagnostic performance of csPC in 45 PI-RADS 3 transition zone lesions, only ratio of CEP 2 + 3 was significantly higher in PC with GS ≥ 3 + 4 (n = 31) than in PC with GS = 6 (n = 14) (P = 0.008). Conclusion Qualitative DCE-MRI indices may contribute to PC aggressiveness and improve detection of csPC in PI-RADS assessment category 3 lesions.
format Article
id doaj-art-4cf5b73da8614ae3ae3d650a8cdbfe68
institution OA Journals
issn 2730-6011
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Discover Oncology
spelling doaj-art-4cf5b73da8614ae3ae3d650a8cdbfe682025-08-20T02:31:48ZengSpringerDiscover Oncology2730-60112024-12-0115111410.1007/s12672-024-01668-9Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRITsutomu Tamada0Mitsuru Takeuchi1Hiroyuki Watanabe2Atsushi Higaki3Kazunori Moriya4Akihiko Kanki5Yoshihiko Fukukura6Akira Yamamoto7Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical SchoolAbstract Purpose To investigate the utility of qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation of DCE-MRI for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). Methods This retrospective study analyzed 307 lesions in 231 patients who underwent 3.0T MRI. Experienced radiologists assessed PI-RADS v 2.1 assessment category, qualitative contrast enhancement (QCE), contrast enhancement pattern (CEP: type 1, 2, 3), tumor contrast ratio, and tumor size of PC lesions in consensus. Mean and 0–10th-percentile ADC value of the lesion (ADCmean and ADC0−10) were calculated. Specimens obtained from MRI–ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy were used as the pathological reference standard. Results In assessment of tumor aggressiveness, PI-RADS assessment category, QCE, tumor size, and ratio of CEP 2 + 3 were significantly higher in PC with Gleason score (GS) ≥ 3 + 4 (n = 256) than in PC with GS = 6 (n = 51) (P ≤ 0.001). Tumor ADCmean and tumor ADC0−10 were comparable between PC with GS ≥ 3 + 4 and PC with GS = 6 (P = 0.164 to 0.504). Regarding diagnostic performance of csPC in 45 PI-RADS 3 transition zone lesions, only ratio of CEP 2 + 3 was significantly higher in PC with GS ≥ 3 + 4 (n = 31) than in PC with GS = 6 (n = 14) (P = 0.008). Conclusion Qualitative DCE-MRI indices may contribute to PC aggressiveness and improve detection of csPC in PI-RADS assessment category 3 lesions.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01668-9Prostate cancerTumor aggressivenessMRIDynamic contrast-enhanced MRIPI-RADS
spellingShingle Tsutomu Tamada
Mitsuru Takeuchi
Hiroyuki Watanabe
Atsushi Higaki
Kazunori Moriya
Akihiko Kanki
Yoshihiko Fukukura
Akira Yamamoto
Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
Discover Oncology
Prostate cancer
Tumor aggressiveness
MRI
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
PI-RADS
title Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
title_full Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
title_fullStr Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
title_short Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
title_sort differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi quantitative indices of dynamic contrast enhanced mri
topic Prostate cancer
Tumor aggressiveness
MRI
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
PI-RADS
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01668-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tsutomutamada differentiatingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerfromclinicallyinsignificantprostatecancerusingqualitativeandsemiquantitativeindicesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmri
AT mitsurutakeuchi differentiatingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerfromclinicallyinsignificantprostatecancerusingqualitativeandsemiquantitativeindicesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmri
AT hiroyukiwatanabe differentiatingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerfromclinicallyinsignificantprostatecancerusingqualitativeandsemiquantitativeindicesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmri
AT atsushihigaki differentiatingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerfromclinicallyinsignificantprostatecancerusingqualitativeandsemiquantitativeindicesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmri
AT kazunorimoriya differentiatingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerfromclinicallyinsignificantprostatecancerusingqualitativeandsemiquantitativeindicesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmri
AT akihikokanki differentiatingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerfromclinicallyinsignificantprostatecancerusingqualitativeandsemiquantitativeindicesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmri
AT yoshihikofukukura differentiatingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerfromclinicallyinsignificantprostatecancerusingqualitativeandsemiquantitativeindicesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmri
AT akirayamamoto differentiatingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerfromclinicallyinsignificantprostatecancerusingqualitativeandsemiquantitativeindicesofdynamiccontrastenhancedmri