Techno-economic assessment of low-carbon ammonia as fuel for the maritime sector

Low-carbon ammonia has recently received interest as alternative fuel for the maritime sector. This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of the total cost of ownership (TCO) of a Post-Panamax vessel powered by low-carbon ammonia. We also calculate the annual increase in carbon tax needed to com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wouter Schreuder, J. Chris Slootweg, Bob van der Zwaan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666352X25000123
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849686727045677056
author Wouter Schreuder
J. Chris Slootweg
Bob van der Zwaan
author_facet Wouter Schreuder
J. Chris Slootweg
Bob van der Zwaan
author_sort Wouter Schreuder
collection DOAJ
description Low-carbon ammonia has recently received interest as alternative fuel for the maritime sector. This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of the total cost of ownership (TCO) of a Post-Panamax vessel powered by low-carbon ammonia. We also calculate the annual increase in carbon tax needed to compensate for the increment in TCO compared to a vessel powered by very low sulfur fuel oil. The increment in TCO is calculated as function of propulsion efficiency to account for uncertainties in the thermodynamics of ammonia combustion for three different cost scenarios of low-carbon ammonia. We evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of hydrogen and diesel as dual fuel for three types of propulsion systems: a compression ignition engine, a spark-ignition engine, and a combination of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system and a spark-ignition engine. We incorporate three different cost levels for ammonia and a variable engine efficiency ranging from 35 % to 55 %. If the ammonia engine has the efficiency of a conventional marine engine, the increment in TCO is 25 % in the most optimistic cost scenario. SOFCs can reach a better efficiency and yield no pollutant emissions, but the reduction in fuel expenses in comparison to conventional combustion engines only offsets their high investment costs at either low engine efficiency or high fuel prices. The increment in TCO and reduction in GHG emissions depend on whether high combustion efficiencies, small dual fuel fractions, and low NOx, N2O, and NH3 emissions can be simultaneously achieved.
format Article
id doaj-art-4cc308f875a0434d8c794ea52ee929f0
institution DOAJ
issn 2666-352X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
spelling doaj-art-4cc308f875a0434d8c794ea52ee929f02025-08-20T03:22:35ZengElsevierApplications in Energy and Combustion Science2666-352X2025-06-012210033010.1016/j.jaecs.2025.100330Techno-economic assessment of low-carbon ammonia as fuel for the maritime sectorWouter Schreuder0J. Chris Slootweg1Bob van der Zwaan2University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science (HIMS and IAS), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Corresponding author.University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science (HIMS and IAS), Amsterdam, The NetherlandsUniversity of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science (HIMS and IAS), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; TNO, Energy & Materials Transition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Johns Hopkins University, School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Bologna, ItalyLow-carbon ammonia has recently received interest as alternative fuel for the maritime sector. This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of the total cost of ownership (TCO) of a Post-Panamax vessel powered by low-carbon ammonia. We also calculate the annual increase in carbon tax needed to compensate for the increment in TCO compared to a vessel powered by very low sulfur fuel oil. The increment in TCO is calculated as function of propulsion efficiency to account for uncertainties in the thermodynamics of ammonia combustion for three different cost scenarios of low-carbon ammonia. We evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of hydrogen and diesel as dual fuel for three types of propulsion systems: a compression ignition engine, a spark-ignition engine, and a combination of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system and a spark-ignition engine. We incorporate three different cost levels for ammonia and a variable engine efficiency ranging from 35 % to 55 %. If the ammonia engine has the efficiency of a conventional marine engine, the increment in TCO is 25 % in the most optimistic cost scenario. SOFCs can reach a better efficiency and yield no pollutant emissions, but the reduction in fuel expenses in comparison to conventional combustion engines only offsets their high investment costs at either low engine efficiency or high fuel prices. The increment in TCO and reduction in GHG emissions depend on whether high combustion efficiencies, small dual fuel fractions, and low NOx, N2O, and NH3 emissions can be simultaneously achieved.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666352X25000123Cargo shippingGreen ammoniaDual fuelTechno-economics
spellingShingle Wouter Schreuder
J. Chris Slootweg
Bob van der Zwaan
Techno-economic assessment of low-carbon ammonia as fuel for the maritime sector
Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Cargo shipping
Green ammonia
Dual fuel
Techno-economics
title Techno-economic assessment of low-carbon ammonia as fuel for the maritime sector
title_full Techno-economic assessment of low-carbon ammonia as fuel for the maritime sector
title_fullStr Techno-economic assessment of low-carbon ammonia as fuel for the maritime sector
title_full_unstemmed Techno-economic assessment of low-carbon ammonia as fuel for the maritime sector
title_short Techno-economic assessment of low-carbon ammonia as fuel for the maritime sector
title_sort techno economic assessment of low carbon ammonia as fuel for the maritime sector
topic Cargo shipping
Green ammonia
Dual fuel
Techno-economics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666352X25000123
work_keys_str_mv AT wouterschreuder technoeconomicassessmentoflowcarbonammoniaasfuelforthemaritimesector
AT jchrisslootweg technoeconomicassessmentoflowcarbonammoniaasfuelforthemaritimesector
AT bobvanderzwaan technoeconomicassessmentoflowcarbonammoniaasfuelforthemaritimesector