Friction and Wear Characterizations in Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Cartilage Engineering

ABSTRACT Electrospun nanofibers are promising materials to treat articular cartilage (AC) defects. However, they still have lower mechanical properties than tissue. There are no standard protocols to test friction in electrospun materials. Only a few studies have reported electrospun mats’ coefficie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André Mathias Souza Plath, Mohammad Alinezhadfar, Stephen J. Ferguson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-VCH 2025-07-01
Series:Nano Select
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/nano.202400165
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849429351966179328
author André Mathias Souza Plath
Mohammad Alinezhadfar
Stephen J. Ferguson
author_facet André Mathias Souza Plath
Mohammad Alinezhadfar
Stephen J. Ferguson
author_sort André Mathias Souza Plath
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Electrospun nanofibers are promising materials to treat articular cartilage (AC) defects. However, they still have lower mechanical properties than tissue. There are no standard protocols to test friction in electrospun materials. Only a few studies have reported electrospun mats’ coefficient of friction (COF). This work aims to evaluate COF and wear for electrospun mats using a universal testing tribometer. Stainless steel, polyoxymethylene (POM), and rubber balls were rubbed against poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) mats. There was a statistically significant difference between metal and rubber/plastic. This is attributed to surface chemistry. POM countersurfaces were rubbed at 1, 10, and 50 mm/s. The results show a small COF reduction proportional to speed and stick‐and‐slip behavior. Finally, we tested a PCL‐zein‐based material for its water contact angle reduction from 120° to 60°. The results demonstrated the lubrication efficiency (20% COF reduction) and hydrophobic‐hydrophilic contacts (33% COF reduction). The study successfully evaluates electrospun mats’ tribological properties. This is followed by the perspective of shear and friction biostimulation in electrospun surfaces. Furthermore, at the tested loads, the material had AC‐like COFs at boundary lubrication conditions.
format Article
id doaj-art-4c9333dfdba949c78ac099f53cadc372
institution Kabale University
issn 2688-4011
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley-VCH
record_format Article
series Nano Select
spelling doaj-art-4c9333dfdba949c78ac099f53cadc3722025-08-20T03:28:24ZengWiley-VCHNano Select2688-40112025-07-0167n/an/a10.1002/nano.202400165Friction and Wear Characterizations in Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Cartilage EngineeringAndré Mathias Souza Plath0Mohammad Alinezhadfar1Stephen J. Ferguson2Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandLaboratory for Surface Science and Coating Technologies EMPA Dubendorf Dubendorf SwitzerlandInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandABSTRACT Electrospun nanofibers are promising materials to treat articular cartilage (AC) defects. However, they still have lower mechanical properties than tissue. There are no standard protocols to test friction in electrospun materials. Only a few studies have reported electrospun mats’ coefficient of friction (COF). This work aims to evaluate COF and wear for electrospun mats using a universal testing tribometer. Stainless steel, polyoxymethylene (POM), and rubber balls were rubbed against poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) mats. There was a statistically significant difference between metal and rubber/plastic. This is attributed to surface chemistry. POM countersurfaces were rubbed at 1, 10, and 50 mm/s. The results show a small COF reduction proportional to speed and stick‐and‐slip behavior. Finally, we tested a PCL‐zein‐based material for its water contact angle reduction from 120° to 60°. The results demonstrated the lubrication efficiency (20% COF reduction) and hydrophobic‐hydrophilic contacts (33% COF reduction). The study successfully evaluates electrospun mats’ tribological properties. This is followed by the perspective of shear and friction biostimulation in electrospun surfaces. Furthermore, at the tested loads, the material had AC‐like COFs at boundary lubrication conditions.https://doi.org/10.1002/nano.202400165articular cartilageelectrospun scaffoldslubricationtribology
spellingShingle André Mathias Souza Plath
Mohammad Alinezhadfar
Stephen J. Ferguson
Friction and Wear Characterizations in Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Cartilage Engineering
Nano Select
articular cartilage
electrospun scaffolds
lubrication
tribology
title Friction and Wear Characterizations in Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Cartilage Engineering
title_full Friction and Wear Characterizations in Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Cartilage Engineering
title_fullStr Friction and Wear Characterizations in Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Cartilage Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Friction and Wear Characterizations in Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Cartilage Engineering
title_short Friction and Wear Characterizations in Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Cartilage Engineering
title_sort friction and wear characterizations in electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for cartilage engineering
topic articular cartilage
electrospun scaffolds
lubrication
tribology
url https://doi.org/10.1002/nano.202400165
work_keys_str_mv AT andremathiassouzaplath frictionandwearcharacterizationsinelectrospunnanofibrousscaffoldsforcartilageengineering
AT mohammadalinezhadfar frictionandwearcharacterizationsinelectrospunnanofibrousscaffoldsforcartilageengineering
AT stephenjferguson frictionandwearcharacterizationsinelectrospunnanofibrousscaffoldsforcartilageengineering