Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online survey

Background. With advancements in orthodontic technology, treatment durations have shortened, often concluding at earlier ages. This shift prompts scrutiny of contemporary retention and post-treatment protocols. The study aimed to assess current professional preferences, compare them against patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liliana Ávila Maltagliati, Sandra Maria Mesquita Alves Uchôa, Rogéria Cristina Calastro, Mayara Paim Patel, Ana Carla Raphaelli Nahás, Hélio Doyle Pereira da Silva, Murilo Matias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2024-09-01
Series:Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Subjects:
Online Access:https://joddd.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/joddd-18-225.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850145649797890048
author Liliana Ávila Maltagliati
Sandra Maria Mesquita Alves Uchôa
Rogéria Cristina Calastro
Mayara Paim Patel
Ana Carla Raphaelli Nahás
Hélio Doyle Pereira da Silva
Murilo Matias
author_facet Liliana Ávila Maltagliati
Sandra Maria Mesquita Alves Uchôa
Rogéria Cristina Calastro
Mayara Paim Patel
Ana Carla Raphaelli Nahás
Hélio Doyle Pereira da Silva
Murilo Matias
author_sort Liliana Ávila Maltagliati
collection DOAJ
description Background. With advancements in orthodontic technology, treatment durations have shortened, often concluding at earlier ages. This shift prompts scrutiny of contemporary retention and post-treatment protocols. The study aimed to assess current professional preferences, compare them against patient age and treatment duration, and investigate the potential impacts of reduced treatment times on professional protocols, particularly when treatment concludes before pubertal growth. Methods. A questionnaire comprising 12 multiple-choice questions focused on active treatment and retention phases was developed using an online survey platform. It was distributed to licensed orthodontists engaged in patient treatment. Bivariate analysis was conducted using ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test, with pairwise comparisons facilitated by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner method. Results. Of 743 respondents, representing a 32% response rate, approximately 70% reported initiating treatment with fixed appliances in pre-pubertal patients. The most prevalent treatment combination involved commencing treatment during early permanent dentition and lasting between 12 to 24 months, resulting in treatment completion before full growth maturation. No discernible individualization was observed in retention protocols or post-retention follow-ups. Traditional retainer prescription post-orthodontic therapy was unanimous among respondents. Notably, experienced orthodontists tended to prefer regular patient visits for follow-up, while less experienced counterparts discharged patients after 12 months. Conclusion. Contemporary orthodontic treatments are characterized by shorter durations, yet orthodontists have not adopted retention and post-treatment follow-up practices accordingly. There is a pressing need for evidence-based guidelines to develop protocols tailored to the shorter treatment durations and the increasing prevalence of younger patients completing treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-4c84b98a59304d55828cff32317efe4e
institution OA Journals
issn 2008-210X
2008-2118
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
spelling doaj-art-4c84b98a59304d55828cff32317efe4e2025-08-20T02:28:02ZengTabriz University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects2008-210X2008-21182024-09-0118322523110.34172/joddd.41030joddd-41030Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online surveyLiliana Ávila Maltagliati0Sandra Maria Mesquita Alves Uchôa1Rogéria Cristina Calastro2Mayara Paim Patel3Ana Carla Raphaelli Nahás4Hélio Doyle Pereira da Silva5Murilo Matias6Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Guarulhos University, São Paulo, BrazilDepartment of TMJ disorder, Faculty of Dentistry, Uninassau University, Pernambuco, BrazilPrivate Office, Brasília, BrazilDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Guarulhos University, São Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Guarulhos University, São Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Guarulhos University, São Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Guarulhos University, São Paulo, BrazilBackground. With advancements in orthodontic technology, treatment durations have shortened, often concluding at earlier ages. This shift prompts scrutiny of contemporary retention and post-treatment protocols. The study aimed to assess current professional preferences, compare them against patient age and treatment duration, and investigate the potential impacts of reduced treatment times on professional protocols, particularly when treatment concludes before pubertal growth. Methods. A questionnaire comprising 12 multiple-choice questions focused on active treatment and retention phases was developed using an online survey platform. It was distributed to licensed orthodontists engaged in patient treatment. Bivariate analysis was conducted using ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test, with pairwise comparisons facilitated by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner method. Results. Of 743 respondents, representing a 32% response rate, approximately 70% reported initiating treatment with fixed appliances in pre-pubertal patients. The most prevalent treatment combination involved commencing treatment during early permanent dentition and lasting between 12 to 24 months, resulting in treatment completion before full growth maturation. No discernible individualization was observed in retention protocols or post-retention follow-ups. Traditional retainer prescription post-orthodontic therapy was unanimous among respondents. Notably, experienced orthodontists tended to prefer regular patient visits for follow-up, while less experienced counterparts discharged patients after 12 months. Conclusion. Contemporary orthodontic treatments are characterized by shorter durations, yet orthodontists have not adopted retention and post-treatment follow-up practices accordingly. There is a pressing need for evidence-based guidelines to develop protocols tailored to the shorter treatment durations and the increasing prevalence of younger patients completing treatment.https://joddd.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/joddd-18-225.pdfage factorsclinical protocolscorrective orthodonticsorthodontic retainers
spellingShingle Liliana Ávila Maltagliati
Sandra Maria Mesquita Alves Uchôa
Rogéria Cristina Calastro
Mayara Paim Patel
Ana Carla Raphaelli Nahás
Hélio Doyle Pereira da Silva
Murilo Matias
Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online survey
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
age factors
clinical protocols
corrective orthodontics
orthodontic retainers
title Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online survey
title_full Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online survey
title_fullStr Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online survey
title_full_unstemmed Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online survey
title_short Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online survey
title_sort have orthodontists changed their retention and follow up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics an online survey
topic age factors
clinical protocols
corrective orthodontics
orthodontic retainers
url https://joddd.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/joddd-18-225.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lilianaavilamaltagliati haveorthodontistschangedtheirretentionandfollowupprotocolsduetocontemporaryorthodonticsanonlinesurvey
AT sandramariamesquitaalvesuchoa haveorthodontistschangedtheirretentionandfollowupprotocolsduetocontemporaryorthodonticsanonlinesurvey
AT rogeriacristinacalastro haveorthodontistschangedtheirretentionandfollowupprotocolsduetocontemporaryorthodonticsanonlinesurvey
AT mayarapaimpatel haveorthodontistschangedtheirretentionandfollowupprotocolsduetocontemporaryorthodonticsanonlinesurvey
AT anacarlaraphaellinahas haveorthodontistschangedtheirretentionandfollowupprotocolsduetocontemporaryorthodonticsanonlinesurvey
AT heliodoylepereiradasilva haveorthodontistschangedtheirretentionandfollowupprotocolsduetocontemporaryorthodonticsanonlinesurvey
AT murilomatias haveorthodontistschangedtheirretentionandfollowupprotocolsduetocontemporaryorthodonticsanonlinesurvey