Varying strategies for processing “loose” argument structure in West Germanic languages
Permissive subjects are non-agentive subjects combined with action verbs in the active form (e. g., “A few years ago a penny would buy you two or three pins”; “The tentsleeps four people”), hardly found in German compared to English. For this contrast, previous research offers an explanation related...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Language Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/flang.2025.1529973/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850139628123717632 |
|---|---|
| author | Anne Renzel Gunther De Vogelaer Jens Bölte |
| author_facet | Anne Renzel Gunther De Vogelaer Jens Bölte |
| author_sort | Anne Renzel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Permissive subjects are non-agentive subjects combined with action verbs in the active form (e. g., “A few years ago a penny would buy you two or three pins”; “The tentsleeps four people”), hardly found in German compared to English. For this contrast, previous research offers an explanation related to processing constraints, proposing that distinct processing strategies account for varying efficiency of processing permissive subjects. The differences in processing strategies are said to be linked to typological properties, specifically word order. It is argued that if a language has SVO order (like English), permissive subjects should be better processed due to more routinized look ahead parsing strategies. In contrast, if a language is SOV (like German), parsers should be more used to look back parsing strategies, leading to difficulties in processing permissive subjects. The present study addresses the question how look ahead vs. look back parsing strategies for permissive subjects depend on features like SVO/SOV. Additionally to English and German, we investigate Dutch, as it is also SOV but seems to allow slightly more diverse roles in the grammatical subject than German. In order to demonstrate cross-linguistic differences in the processing of various types of permissive subjects, we conducted an experiment in which native speakers of English (n = 40), Dutch (n = 45), and German (n = 45) performed a self-paced reading task. The results reveal that German speakers experience greater difficulty processing permissive subjects, as evidenced by considerably slower reading times compared to English speakers. Reading times for Dutch speakers fall between those of English and German speakers. This pattern is not limited to documented permissive subjects, but extends beyond allegedly grammatical constructions (e.g., “The houselives four families”), which are also read faster in English and Dutch than in German. Therefore, our findings suggest fundamental differences in processing strategies for non-agentive subject-verb combinations between English and Dutch (look ahead) on the one hand and German (look back) on the other relating to other typological contrasts than word order influencing the processing of permissive subjects, most likely case. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4c573cd8acbe4e4293f2bbeae9152e68 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2813-4605 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Language Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-4c573cd8acbe4e4293f2bbeae9152e682025-08-20T02:30:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Language Sciences2813-46052025-05-01410.3389/flang.2025.15299731529973Varying strategies for processing “loose” argument structure in West Germanic languagesAnne Renzel0Gunther De Vogelaer1Jens Bölte2Institut für Niederländische Philologie, University of Münster, Münster, GermanyInstitut für Niederländische Philologie, University of Münster, Münster, GermanyInstitut für Psychologie, University of Münster, Münster, GermanyPermissive subjects are non-agentive subjects combined with action verbs in the active form (e. g., “A few years ago a penny would buy you two or three pins”; “The tentsleeps four people”), hardly found in German compared to English. For this contrast, previous research offers an explanation related to processing constraints, proposing that distinct processing strategies account for varying efficiency of processing permissive subjects. The differences in processing strategies are said to be linked to typological properties, specifically word order. It is argued that if a language has SVO order (like English), permissive subjects should be better processed due to more routinized look ahead parsing strategies. In contrast, if a language is SOV (like German), parsers should be more used to look back parsing strategies, leading to difficulties in processing permissive subjects. The present study addresses the question how look ahead vs. look back parsing strategies for permissive subjects depend on features like SVO/SOV. Additionally to English and German, we investigate Dutch, as it is also SOV but seems to allow slightly more diverse roles in the grammatical subject than German. In order to demonstrate cross-linguistic differences in the processing of various types of permissive subjects, we conducted an experiment in which native speakers of English (n = 40), Dutch (n = 45), and German (n = 45) performed a self-paced reading task. The results reveal that German speakers experience greater difficulty processing permissive subjects, as evidenced by considerably slower reading times compared to English speakers. Reading times for Dutch speakers fall between those of English and German speakers. This pattern is not limited to documented permissive subjects, but extends beyond allegedly grammatical constructions (e.g., “The houselives four families”), which are also read faster in English and Dutch than in German. Therefore, our findings suggest fundamental differences in processing strategies for non-agentive subject-verb combinations between English and Dutch (look ahead) on the one hand and German (look back) on the other relating to other typological contrasts than word order influencing the processing of permissive subjects, most likely case.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/flang.2025.1529973/fullpermissive subjectssentence parsingWest Germanic languagesloose vs. tight fit typologylook ahead vs. look back parsingSVO/SOV word order |
| spellingShingle | Anne Renzel Gunther De Vogelaer Jens Bölte Varying strategies for processing “loose” argument structure in West Germanic languages Frontiers in Language Sciences permissive subjects sentence parsing West Germanic languages loose vs. tight fit typology look ahead vs. look back parsing SVO/SOV word order |
| title | Varying strategies for processing “loose” argument structure in West Germanic languages |
| title_full | Varying strategies for processing “loose” argument structure in West Germanic languages |
| title_fullStr | Varying strategies for processing “loose” argument structure in West Germanic languages |
| title_full_unstemmed | Varying strategies for processing “loose” argument structure in West Germanic languages |
| title_short | Varying strategies for processing “loose” argument structure in West Germanic languages |
| title_sort | varying strategies for processing loose argument structure in west germanic languages |
| topic | permissive subjects sentence parsing West Germanic languages loose vs. tight fit typology look ahead vs. look back parsing SVO/SOV word order |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/flang.2025.1529973/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annerenzel varyingstrategiesforprocessinglooseargumentstructureinwestgermaniclanguages AT guntherdevogelaer varyingstrategiesforprocessinglooseargumentstructureinwestgermaniclanguages AT jensbolte varyingstrategiesforprocessinglooseargumentstructureinwestgermaniclanguages |