Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence by university students: a systematic literature review

Problem statement . Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a transformative force across various sectors, including education. The release of ChatGPT marked a pivotal shift in the educational landscape, accompanied by rapid proliferation of other generative AI (Gen-AI). Gen-AI tools have quickly be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna E. Korchak, Yevgeny D. Patarakin, Jamie Costley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2025-03-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.rudn.ru/informatization-education/article/viewFile/43514/24571
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849768402064769024
author Anna E. Korchak
Yevgeny D. Patarakin
Jamie Costley
author_facet Anna E. Korchak
Yevgeny D. Patarakin
Jamie Costley
author_sort Anna E. Korchak
collection DOAJ
description Problem statement . Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a transformative force across various sectors, including education. The release of ChatGPT marked a pivotal shift in the educational landscape, accompanied by rapid proliferation of other generative AI (Gen-AI). Gen-AI tools have quickly become one of the most prevalent forms of AI in higher education. This research focus highlights a need for a comprehensive examination of Gen-AI’s use. Addressing this gap is essential to developing a holistic understanding of GenAI’s role in higher education, particularly from the student perspective. Given the rapid evolution of Gen-AI technology along with its rapidly growing and often uncontrolled adoption among students, a systematic literature review is necessary to synthesise current knowledge. Methodology . This study conducted a tertiary review utilising a systematic approach outlined in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, focusing on three key steps: search strategy and study selection, data analysis, and synthesis of findings. Data for this study was sourced from two databases: Google Scholar and Lens. These databases were chosen for their extensive coverage and accessibility, ensuring a comprehensive collection of relevant literature on AI use in higher education. The data was approached qualitatively: apriori and aposteriori codes were applied to the papers retrieved from Google Scholar. For a deeper analysis of the selected papers, we conducted a thematic analysis to identify recurring themes and patterns. Results . From the initial screening of 620 papers, 42 were selected for the final sample based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main uses of Gen-AI as identified in the analysed papers are summarised in the table. Conclusion. The variance in how AI is used among students -depending on their competence levels - highlights an essential consideration for educators: AI can potentially widen the gap between more and less competent learners. This observation calls for a pedagogical balance where AI supports learning without diminishing the educational rigour necessary for critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
format Article
id doaj-art-4c0c67567a25436e8dc7e6b18cc3d0d0
institution DOAJ
issn 2312-8631
2312-864X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
record_format Article
series RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education
spelling doaj-art-4c0c67567a25436e8dc7e6b18cc3d0d02025-08-20T03:03:49ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education2312-86312312-864X2025-03-01221375710.22363/2312-8631-2025-22-1-37-5721061Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence by university students: a systematic literature reviewAnna E. Korchak0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6007-3098Yevgeny D. Patarakin1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-5043Jamie Costley2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1685-3863Higher School of EconomicsHigher School of EconomicsUnited Arab Emirates UniversityProblem statement . Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a transformative force across various sectors, including education. The release of ChatGPT marked a pivotal shift in the educational landscape, accompanied by rapid proliferation of other generative AI (Gen-AI). Gen-AI tools have quickly become one of the most prevalent forms of AI in higher education. This research focus highlights a need for a comprehensive examination of Gen-AI’s use. Addressing this gap is essential to developing a holistic understanding of GenAI’s role in higher education, particularly from the student perspective. Given the rapid evolution of Gen-AI technology along with its rapidly growing and often uncontrolled adoption among students, a systematic literature review is necessary to synthesise current knowledge. Methodology . This study conducted a tertiary review utilising a systematic approach outlined in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, focusing on three key steps: search strategy and study selection, data analysis, and synthesis of findings. Data for this study was sourced from two databases: Google Scholar and Lens. These databases were chosen for their extensive coverage and accessibility, ensuring a comprehensive collection of relevant literature on AI use in higher education. The data was approached qualitatively: apriori and aposteriori codes were applied to the papers retrieved from Google Scholar. For a deeper analysis of the selected papers, we conducted a thematic analysis to identify recurring themes and patterns. Results . From the initial screening of 620 papers, 42 were selected for the final sample based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main uses of Gen-AI as identified in the analysed papers are summarised in the table. Conclusion. The variance in how AI is used among students -depending on their competence levels - highlights an essential consideration for educators: AI can potentially widen the gap between more and less competent learners. This observation calls for a pedagogical balance where AI supports learning without diminishing the educational rigour necessary for critical thinking and problem-solving skills.https://journals.rudn.ru/informatization-education/article/viewFile/43514/24571educational technologygenerative artificial intelligencehigher educationsystematic literature reviewstudent engagement
spellingShingle Anna E. Korchak
Yevgeny D. Patarakin
Jamie Costley
Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence by university students: a systematic literature review
RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education
educational technology
generative artificial intelligence
higher education
systematic literature review
student engagement
title Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence by university students: a systematic literature review
title_full Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence by university students: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence by university students: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence by university students: a systematic literature review
title_short Exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence by university students: a systematic literature review
title_sort exploring the use of generative artificial intelligence by university students a systematic literature review
topic educational technology
generative artificial intelligence
higher education
systematic literature review
student engagement
url https://journals.rudn.ru/informatization-education/article/viewFile/43514/24571
work_keys_str_mv AT annaekorchak exploringtheuseofgenerativeartificialintelligencebyuniversitystudentsasystematicliteraturereview
AT yevgenydpatarakin exploringtheuseofgenerativeartificialintelligencebyuniversitystudentsasystematicliteraturereview
AT jamiecostley exploringtheuseofgenerativeartificialintelligencebyuniversitystudentsasystematicliteraturereview