Safe Firefighting Distances Using FDS and ALOHA for Oil Tank Fires

Ensuring firefighter safety during oil tank fires is paramount, given the substantial risks posed by thermal radiation. This study employs both the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) and Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres (ALOHA) software to simulate a severe oil tank fire scenario at the Zhushan B...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ming-Chuan Hung, Ching-Yuan Lin, Gary Li-Kai Hsiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Fire
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/7/12/445
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850241341087285248
author Ming-Chuan Hung
Ching-Yuan Lin
Gary Li-Kai Hsiao
author_facet Ming-Chuan Hung
Ching-Yuan Lin
Gary Li-Kai Hsiao
author_sort Ming-Chuan Hung
collection DOAJ
description Ensuring firefighter safety during oil tank fires is paramount, given the substantial risks posed by thermal radiation. This study employs both the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) and Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres (ALOHA) software to simulate a severe oil tank fire scenario at the Zhushan Branch Power Plant, where two heavy oil tanks and multiple light oil tanks are located. The simulation framework divides the combustion scenario into 22.4 million grids with a grid size of 0.5 m, allowing a fine-resolution assessment of thermal radiation. Assuming a worst-case scenario involving n-Heptane combustion, the FDS simulation calculates essential parameters, including temperature, velocity, and soot distribution fields, and suggests a minimum safe firefighting distance of 22 m (equivalent to one tank diameter, 1D) for those equipped with personal protective equipment when exposed to a 5 kW/m<sup>2</sup> heat flux. Meanwhile, ALOHA modeling extends the safety assessment, recommending a downwind safety distance of 62 m (approximately 2D) to establish a preliminary exclusion zone, crucial in early emergency response when data may be incomplete. Additionally, a grid sensitivity analysis was conducted to validate the accuracy of the numerical results. This study underscores the importance of coupling FDS and ALOHA outputs to develop a balanced, adaptive approach to firefighter safety, optimizing response protocols for high-risk environments. The results provide essential guidance for establishing safety zones, advancing standards within fire protection and emergency response, and supporting strategy development for large-scale oil and petrochemical storage facilities.
format Article
id doaj-art-4bdecb3dc1834a2fb73dd4431a083fe9
institution OA Journals
issn 2571-6255
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fire
spelling doaj-art-4bdecb3dc1834a2fb73dd4431a083fe92025-08-20T02:00:38ZengMDPI AGFire2571-62552024-11-0171244510.3390/fire7120445Safe Firefighting Distances Using FDS and ALOHA for Oil Tank FiresMing-Chuan Hung0Ching-Yuan Lin1Gary Li-Kai Hsiao2Department of Architecture, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106335, TaiwanDepartment of Architecture, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106335, TaiwanDepartment of Disaster Management, Taiwan Police College, Taipei 11696, TaiwanEnsuring firefighter safety during oil tank fires is paramount, given the substantial risks posed by thermal radiation. This study employs both the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) and Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres (ALOHA) software to simulate a severe oil tank fire scenario at the Zhushan Branch Power Plant, where two heavy oil tanks and multiple light oil tanks are located. The simulation framework divides the combustion scenario into 22.4 million grids with a grid size of 0.5 m, allowing a fine-resolution assessment of thermal radiation. Assuming a worst-case scenario involving n-Heptane combustion, the FDS simulation calculates essential parameters, including temperature, velocity, and soot distribution fields, and suggests a minimum safe firefighting distance of 22 m (equivalent to one tank diameter, 1D) for those equipped with personal protective equipment when exposed to a 5 kW/m<sup>2</sup> heat flux. Meanwhile, ALOHA modeling extends the safety assessment, recommending a downwind safety distance of 62 m (approximately 2D) to establish a preliminary exclusion zone, crucial in early emergency response when data may be incomplete. Additionally, a grid sensitivity analysis was conducted to validate the accuracy of the numerical results. This study underscores the importance of coupling FDS and ALOHA outputs to develop a balanced, adaptive approach to firefighter safety, optimizing response protocols for high-risk environments. The results provide essential guidance for establishing safety zones, advancing standards within fire protection and emergency response, and supporting strategy development for large-scale oil and petrochemical storage facilities.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/7/12/445FDSALOHAtank firesafe firefighting distancefirefighter safety
spellingShingle Ming-Chuan Hung
Ching-Yuan Lin
Gary Li-Kai Hsiao
Safe Firefighting Distances Using FDS and ALOHA for Oil Tank Fires
Fire
FDS
ALOHA
tank fire
safe firefighting distance
firefighter safety
title Safe Firefighting Distances Using FDS and ALOHA for Oil Tank Fires
title_full Safe Firefighting Distances Using FDS and ALOHA for Oil Tank Fires
title_fullStr Safe Firefighting Distances Using FDS and ALOHA for Oil Tank Fires
title_full_unstemmed Safe Firefighting Distances Using FDS and ALOHA for Oil Tank Fires
title_short Safe Firefighting Distances Using FDS and ALOHA for Oil Tank Fires
title_sort safe firefighting distances using fds and aloha for oil tank fires
topic FDS
ALOHA
tank fire
safe firefighting distance
firefighter safety
url https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/7/12/445
work_keys_str_mv AT mingchuanhung safefirefightingdistancesusingfdsandalohaforoiltankfires
AT chingyuanlin safefirefightingdistancesusingfdsandalohaforoiltankfires
AT garylikaihsiao safefirefightingdistancesusingfdsandalohaforoiltankfires