Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity
We propose a theoretical framework that highlights the most important consequences of complexity for the form and evolution of projects and use it to develop a typology of project complexity. This framework also enables us to deepen the understanding of how knowledge production and flexibility strat...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Complexity |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3190251 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832563077396037632 |
---|---|
author | Serghei Floricel Sorin Piperca Richard Tee |
author_facet | Serghei Floricel Sorin Piperca Richard Tee |
author_sort | Serghei Floricel |
collection | DOAJ |
description | We propose a theoretical framework that highlights the most important consequences of complexity for the form and evolution of projects and use it to develop a typology of project complexity. This framework also enables us to deepen the understanding of how knowledge production and flexibility strategies enable project participants to address complexity. Based on this understanding, we advance a number of propositions regarding the strategies that can be most effective for different categories of complexity. These results contribute to the integration of various strands in the research on project complexity and provide a roadmap for further research on the strategies for addressing it. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-4bd943cb7ba949ec96bb46e89e00a4a4 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1076-2787 1099-0526 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Complexity |
spelling | doaj-art-4bd943cb7ba949ec96bb46e89e00a4a42025-02-03T01:20:58ZengWileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262018-01-01201810.1155/2018/31902513190251Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project ComplexitySerghei Floricel0Sorin Piperca1Richard Tee2Department of Management and Technology, School of Management (ESG), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montreal, QC, CanadaDepartment of Management, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UKManagement Department, Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (LUISS), Rome, ItalyWe propose a theoretical framework that highlights the most important consequences of complexity for the form and evolution of projects and use it to develop a typology of project complexity. This framework also enables us to deepen the understanding of how knowledge production and flexibility strategies enable project participants to address complexity. Based on this understanding, we advance a number of propositions regarding the strategies that can be most effective for different categories of complexity. These results contribute to the integration of various strands in the research on project complexity and provide a roadmap for further research on the strategies for addressing it.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3190251 |
spellingShingle | Serghei Floricel Sorin Piperca Richard Tee Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity Complexity |
title | Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity |
title_full | Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity |
title_fullStr | Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity |
title_short | Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity |
title_sort | strategies for managing the structural and dynamic consequences of project complexity |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3190251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sergheifloricel strategiesformanagingthestructuralanddynamicconsequencesofprojectcomplexity AT sorinpiperca strategiesformanagingthestructuralanddynamicconsequencesofprojectcomplexity AT richardtee strategiesformanagingthestructuralanddynamicconsequencesofprojectcomplexity |