Reaction Engineering for Asymmetric R‐/S‐PAC Synthesis With Ephedrine or Pseudoephedrine Dehydrogenase in Pickering Emulsion

ABSTRACT The synthesis of enantiopure α‐hydroxy ketones, particularly R‐ and S‐phenylacetylcarbinol (PAC), represents an important process in the pharmaceutical industry, serving as a pivotal step in the production of drugs. Recently, two novel enzymes, ephedrine dehydrogenase (EDH) and pseudoephedr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reynaldo Jr. Carubio, Bao‐Hsiang Wang, Marion B. Ansorge‐Schumacher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-VCH 2025-02-01
Series:Engineering in Life Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202400069
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT The synthesis of enantiopure α‐hydroxy ketones, particularly R‐ and S‐phenylacetylcarbinol (PAC), represents an important process in the pharmaceutical industry, serving as a pivotal step in the production of drugs. Recently, two novel enzymes, ephedrine dehydrogenase (EDH) and pseudoephedrine dehydrogenase (PseDH), have been described. These enzymes enable the specific reduction of 1‐phenyl‐1,2‐propanedione (PPD) to R‐PAC and S‐PAC, respectively. In this study, we transferred these enzymes into Pickering emulsions, which is an attractive reaction set‐up for large‐scale synthesis. The bioactive w/o Pickering emulsion (bioactive Pickering emulsion [BioPE]), in which methyl tert‐butyl ether served as the continuous phase, was stabilized by silica nanoparticles. Formate dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus jostii was utilized for cofactor regeneration. Given the considerable complexity of the BioPE, this reaction system underwent a first‐time application of design of experiment (DOE) for systematic engineering. A definitive screening design was employed to identify significant factors affecting space‐time yield (STY) and conversion. Response surface methodology was used to optimize the conditions, resulting in the observation of a high STY of 4.2 g L⁻¹ h⁻¹ and a conversion of 83.2% for BioPE with EDH, and an STY of 4.4 g L⁻¹ h⁻¹ and a conversion of 64.5% for BioPE with PseDH.
ISSN:1618-0240
1618-2863