Be to, grammaticalisation et ambiguïté énonciative
As the title indicates, this paper addresses the issues of grammaticalization and ambiguity, and the relation between the two, in the case of the be to construction.As a verbal periphrasis devoid of any lexical element, only to be found in the simple present and simple preterite (*be to, *being to,...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses Universitaires du Midi
2012-11-01
|
| Series: | Anglophonia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/acs/12626 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832579231278694400 |
|---|---|
| author | Françoise Lachaux |
| author_facet | Françoise Lachaux |
| author_sort | Françoise Lachaux |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | As the title indicates, this paper addresses the issues of grammaticalization and ambiguity, and the relation between the two, in the case of the be to construction.As a verbal periphrasis devoid of any lexical element, only to be found in the simple present and simple preterite (*be to, *being to, *been to), and so very concise as to be labelled as “minimalist”, be to raises several challenging questions, concerning its alledged closeness to passive constructions (such as be supposed to / be expected to), and its superficial morphological similarity with have to.The apparent absence of any marks of involvement on the speaker’s part, together with the cognitive gap created by the lack of lexical basis, leave a vacuum on the semantic and pragmatic levels: could grammaticalization be linked with some strategy of concealment and implicit modality? |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4ac288a158734a1f8f857a178dac941c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1278-3331 2427-0466 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2012-11-01 |
| publisher | Presses Universitaires du Midi |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Anglophonia |
| spelling | doaj-art-4ac288a158734a1f8f857a178dac941c2025-01-30T12:33:27ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662012-11-011616518210.4000/anglophonia.198Be to, grammaticalisation et ambiguïté énonciativeFrançoise LachauxAs the title indicates, this paper addresses the issues of grammaticalization and ambiguity, and the relation between the two, in the case of the be to construction.As a verbal periphrasis devoid of any lexical element, only to be found in the simple present and simple preterite (*be to, *being to, *been to), and so very concise as to be labelled as “minimalist”, be to raises several challenging questions, concerning its alledged closeness to passive constructions (such as be supposed to / be expected to), and its superficial morphological similarity with have to.The apparent absence of any marks of involvement on the speaker’s part, together with the cognitive gap created by the lack of lexical basis, leave a vacuum on the semantic and pragmatic levels: could grammaticalization be linked with some strategy of concealment and implicit modality?https://journals.openedition.org/acs/12626pragmaticssemanticsgrammaticalizationagentivitypresuppositionambiguity |
| spellingShingle | Françoise Lachaux Be to, grammaticalisation et ambiguïté énonciative Anglophonia pragmatics semantics grammaticalization agentivity presupposition ambiguity |
| title | Be to, grammaticalisation et ambiguïté énonciative |
| title_full | Be to, grammaticalisation et ambiguïté énonciative |
| title_fullStr | Be to, grammaticalisation et ambiguïté énonciative |
| title_full_unstemmed | Be to, grammaticalisation et ambiguïté énonciative |
| title_short | Be to, grammaticalisation et ambiguïté énonciative |
| title_sort | be to grammaticalisation et ambiguite enonciative |
| topic | pragmatics semantics grammaticalization agentivity presupposition ambiguity |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/acs/12626 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francoiselachaux betogrammaticalisationetambiguiteenonciative |