Comparison of GRM and GPCM in the Development of Higher Education Practice Assessment Instruments

This study aims to outline various findings of previous research related to the comparison of the application of the Graded Response Model (GRM) and the Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM) in the development of higher education practice assessment instruments. This study uses the Systematic Lit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siti Maimunah, Zuhriyah Hidayati, Kusaeri Kusaeri, Suparto Suparto, Sita Isna Malyuna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fakultas Tarbiyah Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo 2025-07-01
Series:Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/scaffolding/article/view/7281
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850098946230190080
author Siti Maimunah
Zuhriyah Hidayati
Kusaeri Kusaeri
Suparto Suparto
Sita Isna Malyuna
author_facet Siti Maimunah
Zuhriyah Hidayati
Kusaeri Kusaeri
Suparto Suparto
Sita Isna Malyuna
author_sort Siti Maimunah
collection DOAJ
description This study aims to outline various findings of previous research related to the comparison of the application of the Graded Response Model (GRM) and the Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM) in the development of higher education practice assessment instruments. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review. The data in this study are articles indexed in Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 from Scopus. Articles were selected using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) technique. After going through the identification, screening, and eligibility process, 35 articles were included in the inclusion stage and analyzed using meta-synthesis techniques. The results of this study show that the findings of previous research show that the Graded Response Model (GRM) and the Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM) have differences in the development of practice assessment instruments in higher education. That GRM measures competencies based on students' values, attitudes, and spirituality, especially in assessments that use a graded scale such as Likert. In contrast, GPCM provides higher reliability in the context of step-based practice assessment or procedural stages. The results of this study can contribute positively to the development of practice assistance in higher education.
format Article
id doaj-art-4a67fcc0e3e4460da2ac1083c531a1bb
institution DOAJ
issn 2656-4548
2656-4491
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Fakultas Tarbiyah Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo
record_format Article
series Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme
spelling doaj-art-4a67fcc0e3e4460da2ac1083c531a1bb2025-08-20T02:40:35ZengFakultas Tarbiyah Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri PonorogoScaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme2656-45482656-44912025-07-017210.37680/scaffolding.v7i2.7281Comparison of GRM and GPCM in the Development of Higher Education Practice Assessment InstrumentsSiti Maimunah0Zuhriyah Hidayati1Kusaeri Kusaeri2Suparto Suparto3Sita Isna Malyuna4Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya; IndonesiaUniversitas Billfath Lamongan; IndonesiaUniversitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya; IndonesiaUniversitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya; IndonesiaUniversitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban; Indonesia This study aims to outline various findings of previous research related to the comparison of the application of the Graded Response Model (GRM) and the Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM) in the development of higher education practice assessment instruments. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review. The data in this study are articles indexed in Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 from Scopus. Articles were selected using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) technique. After going through the identification, screening, and eligibility process, 35 articles were included in the inclusion stage and analyzed using meta-synthesis techniques. The results of this study show that the findings of previous research show that the Graded Response Model (GRM) and the Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM) have differences in the development of practice assessment instruments in higher education. That GRM measures competencies based on students' values, attitudes, and spirituality, especially in assessments that use a graded scale such as Likert. In contrast, GPCM provides higher reliability in the context of step-based practice assessment or procedural stages. The results of this study can contribute positively to the development of practice assistance in higher education. https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/scaffolding/article/view/7281Comparison of the Graded Response Model (GRM)Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM)Assessment of Higher Education Practice
spellingShingle Siti Maimunah
Zuhriyah Hidayati
Kusaeri Kusaeri
Suparto Suparto
Sita Isna Malyuna
Comparison of GRM and GPCM in the Development of Higher Education Practice Assessment Instruments
Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme
Comparison of the Graded Response Model (GRM)
Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM)
Assessment of Higher Education Practice
title Comparison of GRM and GPCM in the Development of Higher Education Practice Assessment Instruments
title_full Comparison of GRM and GPCM in the Development of Higher Education Practice Assessment Instruments
title_fullStr Comparison of GRM and GPCM in the Development of Higher Education Practice Assessment Instruments
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of GRM and GPCM in the Development of Higher Education Practice Assessment Instruments
title_short Comparison of GRM and GPCM in the Development of Higher Education Practice Assessment Instruments
title_sort comparison of grm and gpcm in the development of higher education practice assessment instruments
topic Comparison of the Graded Response Model (GRM)
Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM)
Assessment of Higher Education Practice
url https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/scaffolding/article/view/7281
work_keys_str_mv AT sitimaimunah comparisonofgrmandgpcminthedevelopmentofhighereducationpracticeassessmentinstruments
AT zuhriyahhidayati comparisonofgrmandgpcminthedevelopmentofhighereducationpracticeassessmentinstruments
AT kusaerikusaeri comparisonofgrmandgpcminthedevelopmentofhighereducationpracticeassessmentinstruments
AT supartosuparto comparisonofgrmandgpcminthedevelopmentofhighereducationpracticeassessmentinstruments
AT sitaisnamalyuna comparisonofgrmandgpcminthedevelopmentofhighereducationpracticeassessmentinstruments