Do The Facts of Voting Rights Support Chief Justice Roberts’s Opinion in Shelby County?
In June, 2013, a 5-4 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court brought to an abrupt and likely permanent end the most important provision of the most successful civil rights law in U.S. history. Initially passed in 1965, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act required “covered jurisdictions,” at first in the D...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Morgan Kousser |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Association Française d'Etudes Américaines
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Transatlantica |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/7462 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Elephant in the Room: NAMUDNO, Shelby County, and Racially Polarized Voting
by: Richard L. Engstrom
Published: (2015-04-01) -
The Voting Rights Act After Shelby County v. Holder: A Potential Fix to Revive Section 5
by: Thomas L. Brunell, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Outdoor Leisure Activities in Simon Roberts’s We English Photographic Project: Re-writing landscape and nation
by: Karine Chambefort
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Paul Carmignani. Shelby Foote. Un sudiste au carré.
by: Michel Bandry
Published: (2006-04-01) -
THE RIGHT TO VOTE AND BREACH OF VOTING SECRECY
by: Radu-Florin GEAMĂNU
Published: (2015-07-01)