Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Objective To estimate the effect of empathy interventions in health education and training from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Methods MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 2019 for RCTs investigating the effect of empathy-enhancing interv...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036471.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841554698719461376 |
|---|---|
| author | Nia Roberts Jeremy Howick Eyad Issa Rachel Winter Robert I Norman |
| author_facet | Nia Roberts Jeremy Howick Eyad Issa Rachel Winter Robert I Norman |
| author_sort | Nia Roberts |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective To estimate the effect of empathy interventions in health education and training from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Methods MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 2019 for RCTs investigating the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in medical and healthcare students and professionals. Studies measuring any aspect of ‘clinical empathy’ as a primary or secondary outcome were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Random effects meta-analyses of the impact of empathy training on participants’ empathy levels were performed.Results Twenty-six trials were included, with 22 providing adequate data for meta-analysis. An overall moderate effect on participant empathy postintervention (standardised mean difference 0.52, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.67) was found. Heterogeneity across trial results was substantial (I2=63%). Data on sustainability of effect was provided by 11 trials and found a moderate effect size for improved empathy up until 12 weeks (0.69, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.15), and a small but statistically significant effect size for sustainability at 12 weeks and beyond (standardised mean difference 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57). In total, 15 studies were considered to be either unclear or high risk of bias. The quality of evidence of included studies was low.Conclusion Findings suggest that empathy-enhancing interventions can be effective at cultivating and sustaining empathy with intervention specifics contributing to effectiveness. This review focuses on an important, growing area of medical education and provides guidance to those looking to develop effective interventions to enhance empathy in the healthcare setting. Further high-quality trials are needed that include patient-led outcome assessments and further evaluate the long-term sustainability of empathy training.Protocol registration number PROSPERO (CRD42019126843). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4a2bcd76f7de42f29c45c6195c04d798 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-4a2bcd76f7de42f29c45c6195c04d7982025-01-08T11:00:13ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2019-036471Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trialsNia Roberts0Jeremy Howick1Eyad Issa2Rachel Winter3Robert I Norman4Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKStoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, UKCollege of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UKCollege of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UKCollege of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UKObjective To estimate the effect of empathy interventions in health education and training from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Methods MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to June 2019 for RCTs investigating the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in medical and healthcare students and professionals. Studies measuring any aspect of ‘clinical empathy’ as a primary or secondary outcome were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Random effects meta-analyses of the impact of empathy training on participants’ empathy levels were performed.Results Twenty-six trials were included, with 22 providing adequate data for meta-analysis. An overall moderate effect on participant empathy postintervention (standardised mean difference 0.52, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.67) was found. Heterogeneity across trial results was substantial (I2=63%). Data on sustainability of effect was provided by 11 trials and found a moderate effect size for improved empathy up until 12 weeks (0.69, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.15), and a small but statistically significant effect size for sustainability at 12 weeks and beyond (standardised mean difference 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57). In total, 15 studies were considered to be either unclear or high risk of bias. The quality of evidence of included studies was low.Conclusion Findings suggest that empathy-enhancing interventions can be effective at cultivating and sustaining empathy with intervention specifics contributing to effectiveness. This review focuses on an important, growing area of medical education and provides guidance to those looking to develop effective interventions to enhance empathy in the healthcare setting. Further high-quality trials are needed that include patient-led outcome assessments and further evaluate the long-term sustainability of empathy training.Protocol registration number PROSPERO (CRD42019126843).https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036471.full |
| spellingShingle | Nia Roberts Jeremy Howick Eyad Issa Rachel Winter Robert I Norman Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials BMJ Open |
| title | Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
| title_full | Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
| title_fullStr | Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
| title_short | Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
| title_sort | assessing the effect of empathy enhancing interventions in health education and training a systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036471.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT niaroberts assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT jeremyhowick assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT eyadissa assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT rachelwinter assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT robertinorman assessingtheeffectofempathyenhancinginterventionsinhealtheducationandtrainingasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |