Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol Concentration

Introduction: The gold standard for quantifying ethanol intoxication in patients is serum testing. However, breath testing is faster, less expensive, and less invasive. It is unknown whether perceived effort during a breath ethanol test impacts the accuracy of the test and the correlation with serum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel J. Stellpflug, William H. Menton, Bjorn C. Westgard, Ryan D. Johnsen, Alexander M. Coomes, Robert C. LeFevere, Michael D. Zwank
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2025-02-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xt6z4p0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849388207068676096
author Samuel J. Stellpflug
William H. Menton
Bjorn C. Westgard
Ryan D. Johnsen
Alexander M. Coomes
Robert C. LeFevere
Michael D. Zwank
author_facet Samuel J. Stellpflug
William H. Menton
Bjorn C. Westgard
Ryan D. Johnsen
Alexander M. Coomes
Robert C. LeFevere
Michael D. Zwank
author_sort Samuel J. Stellpflug
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The gold standard for quantifying ethanol intoxication in patients is serum testing. However, breath testing is faster, less expensive, and less invasive. It is unknown whether perceived effort during a breath ethanol test impacts the accuracy of the test and the correlation with serum concentration. In this study we analyzed whether perceived “poor” effort during breath ethanol testing would result in worse correlation than perceived “normal” breath-testing effort with respect to serum ethanol concentration. Methods: Subjects were identified retrospectively over a 49-month period if they had both a breath ethanol test and a serum ethanol test obtained during the same ED visit within 60 minutes of each other, if they had their effort during the breath test recorded as “normal” or “poor” by the person administering the test, and had non-zero breath and serum ethanol concentrations. We completed descriptive and correlation analyses. Results: A total of 480 patients were enrolled, 245 with normal and 235 with poor effort. The patients with normal breath-test effort had mean breath and serum concentrations of 0.19 grams per deciliter (g/dL) and 0.23 g/dL, respectively. The patients with poor breath-test effort had mean breath and serum concentrations of 0.19 and 0.29 g/dL, respectively. The correlation coefficient between breath and serum ethanol values was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84–0.96) for good effort and 0.63 (95% CI 0.53–0.74) for poor effort. Conclusion: The assessment of breath exhalation effort is meaningful in determining how well a patient’s breath ethanol level correlates with the serum ethanol concentration. Poor breath effort, when compared to normal breath effort, was associated with higher ethanol levels as well as a larger difference and a greater variability between breath and serum values. If an accurate ethanol level is important for clinical decision-making, a physician should not rely on a poor-effort breathalyzer value.
format Article
id doaj-art-49df57cd47f94fc8ad4f5d466f6f986a
institution Kabale University
issn 1936-900X
1936-9018
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj-art-49df57cd47f94fc8ad4f5d466f6f986a2025-08-20T03:42:22ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182025-02-0126236436610.5811/westjem.2499824998Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol ConcentrationSamuel J. Stellpflug0William H. Menton1Bjorn C. Westgard2Ryan D. Johnsen3Alexander M. Coomes4Robert C. LeFevere5Michael D. Zwank6Regions Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint Paul, MinnesotaVA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, MinnesotaRegions Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint Paul, MinnesotaRegions Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint Paul, MinnesotaRegions Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint Paul, MinnesotaRegions Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint Paul, MinnesotaRegions Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint Paul, MinnesotaIntroduction: The gold standard for quantifying ethanol intoxication in patients is serum testing. However, breath testing is faster, less expensive, and less invasive. It is unknown whether perceived effort during a breath ethanol test impacts the accuracy of the test and the correlation with serum concentration. In this study we analyzed whether perceived “poor” effort during breath ethanol testing would result in worse correlation than perceived “normal” breath-testing effort with respect to serum ethanol concentration. Methods: Subjects were identified retrospectively over a 49-month period if they had both a breath ethanol test and a serum ethanol test obtained during the same ED visit within 60 minutes of each other, if they had their effort during the breath test recorded as “normal” or “poor” by the person administering the test, and had non-zero breath and serum ethanol concentrations. We completed descriptive and correlation analyses. Results: A total of 480 patients were enrolled, 245 with normal and 235 with poor effort. The patients with normal breath-test effort had mean breath and serum concentrations of 0.19 grams per deciliter (g/dL) and 0.23 g/dL, respectively. The patients with poor breath-test effort had mean breath and serum concentrations of 0.19 and 0.29 g/dL, respectively. The correlation coefficient between breath and serum ethanol values was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84–0.96) for good effort and 0.63 (95% CI 0.53–0.74) for poor effort. Conclusion: The assessment of breath exhalation effort is meaningful in determining how well a patient’s breath ethanol level correlates with the serum ethanol concentration. Poor breath effort, when compared to normal breath effort, was associated with higher ethanol levels as well as a larger difference and a greater variability between breath and serum values. If an accurate ethanol level is important for clinical decision-making, a physician should not rely on a poor-effort breathalyzer value.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xt6z4p0
spellingShingle Samuel J. Stellpflug
William H. Menton
Bjorn C. Westgard
Ryan D. Johnsen
Alexander M. Coomes
Robert C. LeFevere
Michael D. Zwank
Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol Concentration
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
title Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol Concentration
title_full Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol Concentration
title_fullStr Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol Concentration
title_full_unstemmed Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol Concentration
title_short Effort During Ethanol Breath Testing Impacts Correlation with Serum Ethanol Concentration
title_sort effort during ethanol breath testing impacts correlation with serum ethanol concentration
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xt6z4p0
work_keys_str_mv AT samueljstellpflug effortduringethanolbreathtestingimpactscorrelationwithserumethanolconcentration
AT williamhmenton effortduringethanolbreathtestingimpactscorrelationwithserumethanolconcentration
AT bjorncwestgard effortduringethanolbreathtestingimpactscorrelationwithserumethanolconcentration
AT ryandjohnsen effortduringethanolbreathtestingimpactscorrelationwithserumethanolconcentration
AT alexandermcoomes effortduringethanolbreathtestingimpactscorrelationwithserumethanolconcentration
AT robertclefevere effortduringethanolbreathtestingimpactscorrelationwithserumethanolconcentration
AT michaeldzwank effortduringethanolbreathtestingimpactscorrelationwithserumethanolconcentration