USE OF DRONE FOR MONITORING AND PRODUCTION ESTIMATING IN AGRICULTURAL CROPS; CASE STUDY IN WHEAT

The study aimed to estimate wheat production based on aerial images taken with drone. The wheat crop, Alex cultivar, was fertilized with variable doses of nitrogen, in the range 0 - 250 kg ha-1 N active substance (a.s.). During the vegetation, drone images were taken on the experimental variants, be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristian CONSTANTINESCU, Florin SALA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest 2021-01-01
Series:Scientific Papers Series : Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
Online Access:https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.21_4/Art18.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850099841989869568
author Cristian CONSTANTINESCU
Florin SALA
author_facet Cristian CONSTANTINESCU
Florin SALA
author_sort Cristian CONSTANTINESCU
collection DOAJ
description The study aimed to estimate wheat production based on aerial images taken with drone. The wheat crop, Alex cultivar, was fertilized with variable doses of nitrogen, in the range 0 - 250 kg ha-1 N active substance (a.s.). During the vegetation, drone images were taken on the experimental variants, between April and July 2018. The digital images, jpeg format, were analyzed and the values of the RGB parameters were obtained (R-red, B-blue, G-green; RGB colour system). At the time of biological maturity, wheat production was harvested, which recorded values between 1,896.64 kg ha-1 (V1-control), and 4,787.50 ka ha-1 (V9). Regression analysis was used to estimate production based on RGB parameters obtained from digital images, taken at four different times. Production prediction (YP) was possible in statistical safety conditions (R2 = 0.997, p <0.001, images from April 29; R2 = 0.993, p <0.001, images from May 13; R2 = 0.990, p <0.001, images from 28 May; R22 = 0.968, p <0.001, images from 1 July). 3D and isoquants models were obtained, which expressed the variation of production according to the R and G parameters. RMSEP, as a prediction safety parameter and the F-test showed different levels of accuracy in predicting wheat production based on parameters R and G (RMSEP = 183.5859 for April 29; RMSEP = 330.3418 for May 13; RMSEP = 386.3834 for May 28; RMSEP = 703.9887 for July 1). The use of drones to obtain information about agricultural land is very useful at farm level, and the study can be adapted to different crops.
format Article
id doaj-art-49d181aca0854ce7944ed4be92ce24fa
institution DOAJ
issn 2284-7995
2285-3952
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest
record_format Article
series Scientific Papers Series : Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
spelling doaj-art-49d181aca0854ce7944ed4be92ce24fa2025-08-20T02:40:24ZengUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, BucharestScientific Papers Series : Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development2284-79952285-39522021-01-012141511601219USE OF DRONE FOR MONITORING AND PRODUCTION ESTIMATING IN AGRICULTURAL CROPS; CASE STUDY IN WHEATCristian CONSTANTINESCUFlorin SALAThe study aimed to estimate wheat production based on aerial images taken with drone. The wheat crop, Alex cultivar, was fertilized with variable doses of nitrogen, in the range 0 - 250 kg ha-1 N active substance (a.s.). During the vegetation, drone images were taken on the experimental variants, between April and July 2018. The digital images, jpeg format, were analyzed and the values of the RGB parameters were obtained (R-red, B-blue, G-green; RGB colour system). At the time of biological maturity, wheat production was harvested, which recorded values between 1,896.64 kg ha-1 (V1-control), and 4,787.50 ka ha-1 (V9). Regression analysis was used to estimate production based on RGB parameters obtained from digital images, taken at four different times. Production prediction (YP) was possible in statistical safety conditions (R2 = 0.997, p <0.001, images from April 29; R2 = 0.993, p <0.001, images from May 13; R2 = 0.990, p <0.001, images from 28 May; R22 = 0.968, p <0.001, images from 1 July). 3D and isoquants models were obtained, which expressed the variation of production according to the R and G parameters. RMSEP, as a prediction safety parameter and the F-test showed different levels of accuracy in predicting wheat production based on parameters R and G (RMSEP = 183.5859 for April 29; RMSEP = 330.3418 for May 13; RMSEP = 386.3834 for May 28; RMSEP = 703.9887 for July 1). The use of drones to obtain information about agricultural land is very useful at farm level, and the study can be adapted to different crops.https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.21_4/Art18.pdf
spellingShingle Cristian CONSTANTINESCU
Florin SALA
USE OF DRONE FOR MONITORING AND PRODUCTION ESTIMATING IN AGRICULTURAL CROPS; CASE STUDY IN WHEAT
Scientific Papers Series : Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
title USE OF DRONE FOR MONITORING AND PRODUCTION ESTIMATING IN AGRICULTURAL CROPS; CASE STUDY IN WHEAT
title_full USE OF DRONE FOR MONITORING AND PRODUCTION ESTIMATING IN AGRICULTURAL CROPS; CASE STUDY IN WHEAT
title_fullStr USE OF DRONE FOR MONITORING AND PRODUCTION ESTIMATING IN AGRICULTURAL CROPS; CASE STUDY IN WHEAT
title_full_unstemmed USE OF DRONE FOR MONITORING AND PRODUCTION ESTIMATING IN AGRICULTURAL CROPS; CASE STUDY IN WHEAT
title_short USE OF DRONE FOR MONITORING AND PRODUCTION ESTIMATING IN AGRICULTURAL CROPS; CASE STUDY IN WHEAT
title_sort use of drone for monitoring and production estimating in agricultural crops case study in wheat
url https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.21_4/Art18.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cristianconstantinescu useofdroneformonitoringandproductionestimatinginagriculturalcropscasestudyinwheat
AT florinsala useofdroneformonitoringandproductionestimatinginagriculturalcropscasestudyinwheat