Comparative Evaluation of Regain of Consciousness in Dexmedetomidine–Propofol versus Ketamine–Propofol in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedure under Sedation using BIS Monitoring: A Randomized Prospective Study

Background: Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are not rare and often require an intervention at some point of time. Pediatric cardiac catheterization, a minimally invasive procedure, is performed to diagnose and to correct many cardiac abnormalities. Deep sedation with spontaneously breathing patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Priya Banga, Sunder L. Negi, Banashree Mandal, Parag Barwad, Kulbhushan Saini, Krishna P. Gourav
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/aca.aca_19_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860720633118720
author Priya Banga
Sunder L. Negi
Banashree Mandal
Parag Barwad
Kulbhushan Saini
Krishna P. Gourav
author_facet Priya Banga
Sunder L. Negi
Banashree Mandal
Parag Barwad
Kulbhushan Saini
Krishna P. Gourav
author_sort Priya Banga
collection DOAJ
description Background: Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are not rare and often require an intervention at some point of time. Pediatric cardiac catheterization, a minimally invasive procedure, is performed to diagnose and to correct many cardiac abnormalities. Deep sedation with spontaneously breathing patients is the preferred technique for pediatric catheterization in the pediatric population. Therefore, the author aimed to find the best combination of drugs for pediatric cardiac catheterization procedures using dexmedetomidine–propofol (DP) and ketamine–propofol (KP). Materials and Methods: Cyanotic and acyanotic CHD children, weighing 5–20 kg and undergoing sedation for cardiac catheterization, were randomly assigned into two groups. DP group children received a bolus intravenous (IV) propofol at 1 mg/kg body weight followed by 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes. KP group children received a bolus IV propofol 1 mg/kg followed by ketamine 1 mg/kg over 10 minutes. For maintenance in the DP group, propofol infusion at 1.5 to 2 mg/kg/h and dexmedetomidine at 0.5 mcg/kg/h was started. In the KP group, propofol infusion at 1.5 to 2 mg/kg/h and ketamine at 1 mg/kg/h was started as maintenance. The bispectral index (BIS) was monitored throughout the procedure, and the BIS value was maintained between 60 and 80. Propofol top of 1 mg/kg was administered when the BIS value became more than 80 or when the child moved during the femoral vessel puncture or when the child moved during the procedure. Results: The mean time for regain of consciousness was faster (P < 0.005) in the KP group (11.02 ± 11.98) compared to the DP group (21.62 ± 18.68). BIS was monitored throughout the procedure; BIS values were lower (P < 0.001) in the DP group (60.0 ± 11.1) as compared to the KP group (73.7 ± 5.6). The cumulative doses of propofol in the KP group and DP group were comparable. Total fentanyl consumptions in the intraoperative period in the KP group and DP group were comparable (P > 0.001). There was no difference in drug side effects between the groups. Conclusion: The KP combination had fast and early recovery compared to the DP combination in children who underwent the cardiac catheterization procedure under sedation in children undergoing cardiac catheterization procedures requiring sedation.
format Article
id doaj-art-49cdac9bf26e4b5f9ba6ac6f5d74017b
institution Kabale University
issn 0971-9784
0974-5181
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
spelling doaj-art-49cdac9bf26e4b5f9ba6ac6f5d74017b2025-02-10T10:45:15ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAnnals of Cardiac Anaesthesia0971-97840974-51812025-01-01281333810.4103/aca.aca_19_24Comparative Evaluation of Regain of Consciousness in Dexmedetomidine–Propofol versus Ketamine–Propofol in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedure under Sedation using BIS Monitoring: A Randomized Prospective StudyPriya BangaSunder L. NegiBanashree MandalParag BarwadKulbhushan SainiKrishna P. GouravBackground: Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are not rare and often require an intervention at some point of time. Pediatric cardiac catheterization, a minimally invasive procedure, is performed to diagnose and to correct many cardiac abnormalities. Deep sedation with spontaneously breathing patients is the preferred technique for pediatric catheterization in the pediatric population. Therefore, the author aimed to find the best combination of drugs for pediatric cardiac catheterization procedures using dexmedetomidine–propofol (DP) and ketamine–propofol (KP). Materials and Methods: Cyanotic and acyanotic CHD children, weighing 5–20 kg and undergoing sedation for cardiac catheterization, were randomly assigned into two groups. DP group children received a bolus intravenous (IV) propofol at 1 mg/kg body weight followed by 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes. KP group children received a bolus IV propofol 1 mg/kg followed by ketamine 1 mg/kg over 10 minutes. For maintenance in the DP group, propofol infusion at 1.5 to 2 mg/kg/h and dexmedetomidine at 0.5 mcg/kg/h was started. In the KP group, propofol infusion at 1.5 to 2 mg/kg/h and ketamine at 1 mg/kg/h was started as maintenance. The bispectral index (BIS) was monitored throughout the procedure, and the BIS value was maintained between 60 and 80. Propofol top of 1 mg/kg was administered when the BIS value became more than 80 or when the child moved during the femoral vessel puncture or when the child moved during the procedure. Results: The mean time for regain of consciousness was faster (P < 0.005) in the KP group (11.02 ± 11.98) compared to the DP group (21.62 ± 18.68). BIS was monitored throughout the procedure; BIS values were lower (P < 0.001) in the DP group (60.0 ± 11.1) as compared to the KP group (73.7 ± 5.6). The cumulative doses of propofol in the KP group and DP group were comparable. Total fentanyl consumptions in the intraoperative period in the KP group and DP group were comparable (P > 0.001). There was no difference in drug side effects between the groups. Conclusion: The KP combination had fast and early recovery compared to the DP combination in children who underwent the cardiac catheterization procedure under sedation in children undergoing cardiac catheterization procedures requiring sedation.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/aca.aca_19_24bispectral indexdexmedetomidine–propofolketamine–propofolpediatric cardiac catheterizationregain of consciousness
spellingShingle Priya Banga
Sunder L. Negi
Banashree Mandal
Parag Barwad
Kulbhushan Saini
Krishna P. Gourav
Comparative Evaluation of Regain of Consciousness in Dexmedetomidine–Propofol versus Ketamine–Propofol in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedure under Sedation using BIS Monitoring: A Randomized Prospective Study
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
bispectral index
dexmedetomidine–propofol
ketamine–propofol
pediatric cardiac catheterization
regain of consciousness
title Comparative Evaluation of Regain of Consciousness in Dexmedetomidine–Propofol versus Ketamine–Propofol in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedure under Sedation using BIS Monitoring: A Randomized Prospective Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Regain of Consciousness in Dexmedetomidine–Propofol versus Ketamine–Propofol in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedure under Sedation using BIS Monitoring: A Randomized Prospective Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Regain of Consciousness in Dexmedetomidine–Propofol versus Ketamine–Propofol in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedure under Sedation using BIS Monitoring: A Randomized Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Regain of Consciousness in Dexmedetomidine–Propofol versus Ketamine–Propofol in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedure under Sedation using BIS Monitoring: A Randomized Prospective Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Regain of Consciousness in Dexmedetomidine–Propofol versus Ketamine–Propofol in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Procedure under Sedation using BIS Monitoring: A Randomized Prospective Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of regain of consciousness in dexmedetomidine propofol versus ketamine propofol in the pediatric cardiac catheterization procedure under sedation using bis monitoring a randomized prospective study
topic bispectral index
dexmedetomidine–propofol
ketamine–propofol
pediatric cardiac catheterization
regain of consciousness
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/aca.aca_19_24
work_keys_str_mv AT priyabanga comparativeevaluationofregainofconsciousnessindexmedetomidinepropofolversusketaminepropofolinthepediatriccardiaccatheterizationprocedureundersedationusingbismonitoringarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT sunderlnegi comparativeevaluationofregainofconsciousnessindexmedetomidinepropofolversusketaminepropofolinthepediatriccardiaccatheterizationprocedureundersedationusingbismonitoringarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT banashreemandal comparativeevaluationofregainofconsciousnessindexmedetomidinepropofolversusketaminepropofolinthepediatriccardiaccatheterizationprocedureundersedationusingbismonitoringarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT paragbarwad comparativeevaluationofregainofconsciousnessindexmedetomidinepropofolversusketaminepropofolinthepediatriccardiaccatheterizationprocedureundersedationusingbismonitoringarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT kulbhushansaini comparativeevaluationofregainofconsciousnessindexmedetomidinepropofolversusketaminepropofolinthepediatriccardiaccatheterizationprocedureundersedationusingbismonitoringarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT krishnapgourav comparativeevaluationofregainofconsciousnessindexmedetomidinepropofolversusketaminepropofolinthepediatriccardiaccatheterizationprocedureundersedationusingbismonitoringarandomizedprospectivestudy